Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
NEW PODCAST! We think #SKYSCRAPER is the worst movie of the year, but @Mikeonscreen enjoyed it! We passionately deb…

Hereafter Archives -

Hereafter Archives -

Karen Posada


2010/10/21 at 12:00am



Hereafter is a dramatic film that has many elements that make it worth watching, its strongest being the storyline. Don’t’ be fooled by the trailer, if you are expecting an action flick it has been advertised wrong; it is about death and the possibility of an afterlife and trying to understand what happens after we die. The first scene does a nice job in taking you in and wanting to explore more, the fact that it is split into three stories carried out by completely different characters in various parts of the world makes it all the more interesting. The subject matter might make some skeptic and want to turn away; as well as the feeble romance which takes away from the film. The film does convey it’s message well which is to raise questions and curiosity no matter how you feel about the subject.

Hereafter deals with mortality and how three strangers who have completely different lives are affected by it. George (Matt Damon) has a gift or curse from which he’s desperately trying to get away from, Marie (Cécile de France) is completely happy with her perfect life until a near-death experience changes all of that and Marcus (George Mclaren & Frankie McLaren) has to face death as well as separation at a young age. We get a very in-depth look at each one of these characters lives and we get to comprehend each one of their stories which have death, mortality and loneliness as underlying themes that connect them. They each toy with the idea of an afterlife and each one is on a path that they have to travel alone and despite of having some family members or friends it is on this lonely journey that they find their answers or closure and are matured by the process.

The screenwriter Peter Morgan told us a funny story on how after a long process his script, which was inspired by a book he read and the loss of a friend, ended up on the hands of one of the executive producers Steven Spielberg; he then went on to give it to Clint Eastwood who decided to direct it. Eastwood’s name is all over the film, everything is so well thought out and organized that we can see it was done by a top notch director. Here he tried to work with special effects on a well developed sequence which runs through smoothly, but I would not say is the best CGI work I’ve ever seen; it could have been much better, throughout most of it you could pick out the CGI elements easily which took away from it. Also, the final scene has some of the corniest music i’ve ever heard; not only is it cheesy but it changes the storyline as well; I found the romance unnecessary and desperate for a happy ending. The twin brothers in this movie were amazing, knowing that they are non actors made me appreciate their scenes even more. Their story is so touching that it was hard to keep my eyes from watering, close enough to tearing. De France’s strong character shows us that after a storm the sun always comes out with some perseverance and she portrayed that beautifully. It was interesting to see Damon in such a ‘push-over’ role, most of the time he’s kind of being told what to do and he follows along; it shows the quality of his acting and how diverse it can be.

Besides posing questions the film teaches us one thing about death no matter what our beliefs are about it: we need to learn to let go and move on. I appreciated the film for kind of poking fun at one of the themes it promotes, but also because it shows us how deep human relationships go, how easily we are tied to one another and how hard it is to move on from that to be our own individual selves. It deals with the ‘hereafter’ not the idea of heaven or hell, so there’s more of a spiritual tie to it than religious which makes it easier to swallow.

Karen Posada


2010/10/13 at 12:00am

3 questions with Clint Eastwood and Matt Damon

3 questions with Clint Eastwood and Matt Damon got a chance to catch up with Clint Eastwood the director of the film Hereafter and the main character, Matt Damon. This was the closing film for the 48th New York International Film Festival. They told us a little bit about the film and how they prepared for it, we received a joyous interview where they complemented one another’s answers; with their pleasant personalities we got a couple of laughs and plenty of information about the dramatic film which brings the story of three people from different sides of the world into one wholesome storyline that is moving and touching. (SBC):Mr. Eastwood, does it seem to you that sometimes there’s similar themes in your films? Also, what are your thoughts on staying relevant as a director?

Clint Eastwood (CE): I like to think there are different themes in every film, I don’t know if there’s an on going theme; is that what you are suggesting?I think everything to me is spontaneous, [say] ‘Unforgiven’ is an example [of] a script I liked right away, I said: “This is great but i’d like to do this when i’m older.” So, I stuck it in the drawer for 10 years and then took it out. Other projects have just come to me, ‘A perfect world’, [some] are just whatever, they  just sort of fall and I have no real grime or reason. I wish I could give you some sort of pseudo intellectual thing… If this was a french cinema class i’d have to fake something. *laughs* I’m not really the person to ask on that, if I start evaluating myself i’m afraid that I would be afraid to not be able to think intelligibly of every project at various meetings.

Matt Damon (MD): I actually asked a similar question of him on ‘Invictus’ but it was about directors as they got older: “Why was it that they historically seem to fall off kind of” right? I said:”‘What is that?” I remember asking him because he’s obviously completely avoided that *laughs* (CE cuts him off and says “not so fast”). He thought about it for 10seconds and then said: “I don’t know,” he said “it doesn’t make sense to me”. It never did to me either because presumably the older we get the wiser we get, the more knowledge about film-making, the more different kind of films you’ve made. You know this one had stuff, that whole CGI thing he kind of just plowed into it with utter confidence and that sequence is incredible; so it is kind of mystifying to me that people historically , the great directors too not all of them but many of them kind of fell off as they got older and it never really made sense to me. So, i asked that question of him.

CE: Well it seems like most, I was always shocked. I knew Frank Capra a little bit and I spent some time with him at Cayugan lake, where he lived in the summer time and he was always so bright and i just  always thought: “Why isn’t this guy working.” I also knew Billy Wilder somewhat and he had actually stopped working in his sixties and i thought: “God, that’s amazing, here’s a guy who’s bright and lived well into his 90’s and didn’t work”. I never could [understand] that, I figure your best years should be at a point when you’ve absorbed all this knowledge; now maybe they just didn’t keep up with the times or they picked stories that didn’t work. I have a few pictures that don’t do so well and all of the sudden you know people are very fickle, things in Hollywood are very fickle and they kind of move on. There is a [Portuguese] director who is still making films at over 100 years old and I plan to do the same thing. *every one laughs and claps*

SBC: Could you speak about the 2 young twin brothers in the film and how it was like working with them for the two of you.

MD: Well, he casted them and I remember talking to him during the process and he said he found…I mean, I think we were pretty resigned to the reality that we’d have probably non actors, because obviously you are looking for an 11 or 12 year old kid, so you are not going to find like a Julliard graduate. Clint just loved their faces, I remember talking to him and [him] saying: “You know the faces of these boys  are terrific, they seem to be from the same neighborhood [as their characters] and they are non actors.” They shot the first 2 stories without me, so I would kind of get reports on how the boys were doing, but obviously [when] it came down to the scene [we did together] there’s a lot made of the few takes Clint does, but he does the number of takes that are required. We both went in that day going, “we are really going to have to get this from these guys” and one really smart thing that Clint did was that he interchanged the twins, even if he was only going to use one of them he let them both do the scenes. So, that I think took a lot of pressure off both the boys. For that scene it allowed us to play them off one another, I would get one of them aside and get all of this information, like ‘did his brother have a girlfriend’ or little things like ‘whose farts were the stinkiest’; things that they would think were funny. *laughs*Then while the camera was on them Clint and I would ask them to reveal these things so that we got real reactions out of them and just little tricks like that just to help them, because movie sets can get tense and people can get nervous pretty easily, never on his sets but that’s all by design and he kind of created an environment where those kids wouldn’t know that they really shot a movie, I think they had a really good time, they’ll probably be surprised when they see the movie.

CE: You know the interesting thing with child actors is they, kids are natural actors, they are wonderful actors and most kids are acting all the time. They are out in the yard playing and they are imagining and can get very vivid. Unfortunately, once they’ve been organized into acting and somebody says: “Come on… no do it this way” and I’ve watched many times over the years in other films where a director will try to undo a lot of bad habits that have been instilled. So, when I looked at young kids for this picture I took the two that were the least experienced; in fact they had to have no experience, they’d never been on a film before, they said they had been in some grammar school plays but I doubted that, *laughs* but they had the faces. I’m one of those guys that if you cast a film correctly that’s with professionals or amateurs you are probably 40% there, if you’ve casted a film incorrectly you are going to be fighting an uphill battle, but these kids I just figured I could pull things out of them without them knowing it, better than trying to get somebody organized. [We] auditioned about 3 or 4 sets of identical twins, they looked great but there was a lot of acting going on and I said: “these guys have the right face and their accents are from the right neighborhood”, they had certain aspects that these kids needed to have built into their system so we didn’t have to do anything, they didn’t have to get in there to act like something else that they weren’t.

SBC: How did you prepare for the film? Did you do some research?

CE: [The film] raises a lot of questions but that is just like Peter Morgan(screenwriter) was saying that the questions that is where it ends, you pose the questions and it’s up to the audience to meet you half way and think about it in terms of their own lives; what their thoughts are or what experiences they might have had, they may be some near death experiences out there and it’d be interesting to see what the answers were, but they are going to have to come up with all the answers. As far as the technical thing, you know, like doing the tsunami I took all the amateur footage shot on that particular tsunami when it was happening, we took that and used it as our influences to get going, but everything else has to be in the imagination of the performer and I know everybody has a way of preparing; I just allow everybody to do that on their own and then if something isn’t working then [that’s] another thing. If you have people that do that inner research they bring that to the table. I’m a firm believer in research but i’m also a firm believer in utilizing the instincts that are within you…wherever they reside.

MD: It was just a terrific script too, it was really tight. Whenever anybody asks me that I just say: “It’s just [a] very tight script” and it read like a play, in a sense that sometimes when you do a play you don’t have to do anything, you explore the material and every answer you need is there. I’m somebody that does a lot of research normally on my own and i didn’t feel…I mean for one as Peter said, I didn’t want to go down the rabbit hole, you know. *laughs* If somebody was recommended to me, ‘you know this guy is fantastic’ then I would have gone and spoken to him, but nobody like that came up; it was all really all on the page in terms on getting ready…I had to do some fork lift training that was about it. *laughs*

Select a Page