Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Movie Reviews

Ted Faraone

By

2011/07/28 at 12:00am

Cowboys and Aliens

07.28.2011 | By |

Cowboys and Aliens

Helmer Jon Favreau seems to have found his métier as a director of sci-fi flicks.  That may be good for his bank account, but not so good for auds.  Favreau is a very talented guy who has done just about everything that one can do in film and largely done it well.  A few box office hits in the sci-fi genre with bankable stars in the cast (Iron Man and Iron Man 2) have shown him the light.  It’s not exactly the headlight of an oncoming train at the end of the tunnel, but he could do better.

Cowboys & Aliens, which opens Friday, July 29, is a silly movie.  That is not to say that it isn’t fun to watch.  Even the 1936 propaganda film, “Reefer Madness” (a.k.a. Tell Your Children) offers a degree of amusement.  But watching “Cowboys & Aliens” is akin to ordering from a Chinese buffet menu — One from column A, two from column B.  Pic is a blend of clichés from high-tech sci-fi pix (think “Aliens,” “Priest,” and “Super 8”), a morality tale, and a western, topped off by a sucker-punch to auds delivered by a hummingbird.

It also stars Daniel Craig as bandito Jake Lonnergan who has a bad case of amnesia and Harrison Ford as former Union Army Civil War Colonel Woodrow Dolarhyde and current local cattleman and padrone of a one-horse town in the wild American West of 1873.  In other words, it was bankable.  Dolarhyde is a greedy bastard who has trouble showing emotion.  He also has a son, Percy (Paul Dano) who is the local bully.  Keith Carradine is perhaps one of pic’s two or three most convincing thesps as the local sheriff.  And Olivia Wilde graces the screen as a good space alien — which explains why her eye makeup withstands explosions, physical attack by bad space aliens, and plunges into deep water.  Max Factor, eat your heart out!  At least she gets a better part than she had in “Priest.”

Throw in a cast of thousands including a plucky kid (Noah Ringer), a loyal dog, a tough-talking minister (Clancy Brown), and an Indian chief (Raoul Trujillo), and a bunch of bad space aliens who look like a cross between the thing from “Super 8” and the acid-blooded creatures from “Aliens,” and shake until the mixing glass is frosty.  You get a movie of sorts.

What little humor “Cowboys & Aliens” offers comes from some deadpanned punchlines uttered by Craig, Carradine, and Brown.  Dialogue is not pic’s strong suit.  Best lines seem to go to Trujillo who allegedly speaks only in the Apache language.

There is a moment in an adventure or crime movie when an experienced filmgoer will say to himself — or to the very attractive and incisive amateur critic seated to his left), “I knew that was going to happen.”

“Cowboys & Aliens” has more than a few.

Pic opens with a wounded Craig waking up in a desolate landscape wearing an odd metal bracelet and being set upon by a trio of bad guys.  He dispatches them with super-human dispatch, a gift which serves him well throughout pic’s 118 minutes.

Arriving in the one-horse town, he dispatches the local bully and gets the attention of gun toting Ella (Wilde) and the sheriff, who recognizes him from a “Wanted” poster.  What Craig doesn’t remember is that he has stolen gold from Ford and that he was abducted and escaped from the bad space aliens.  Evidently amnesia is one of the after-effects of alien abduction.

Just as Craig and Percy the bully (who accidentally shoots a deputy) are about to be handed over to U.S. Marshalls, Ford arrives to spring his kid.  At the same time, the bad aliens attack the town with what appear to be jet fighter-bombers.  In the process they kidnap about half the inhabitants.

The rest of pic centers on a few revelations (Craig’s memory slowly returns thanks to Ella and some Indian mysticism) and the need for banditi, greedy guys, a good space alien, and the Apache to join forces to defeat the aliens before the planet is taken over for its gold deposits.  The bad space aliens arrived on a rocket-powered space ship which contains both gold mining and refining equipment.  Like Nazis, they even pull the gold teeth from their captives.

Ending is totally predictable.  Harrison Ford’s shell cracks.  The “Wanted” poster is forgotten.  The bad aliens appear to be dispatched, some good guys die heroic deaths, and the plucky kid comes of age early.

Pic’s sucker punch comes in the form of a hummingbird, a special-effects hummingbird, no less, connected to Ella, which appears to Craig first as he regains his memory and again in the final reel only to scream a figurative “sequel!”

“Cowboys & Aliens” offers more than a few good action scenes.  Special effects, save the bad aliens, are not bad.  Best effect is Wilde emerging buck naked from a funeral pyre set for her by the Apache.  In order to keep pic’s PG-13 rating Craig covers her with an Indian blanket before any more than her fine backside appears on screen.  Have no fear in taking the kids.

The morality tale, utterly politically correct in today’s climate, is that greedy people have to set aside their greed and unite with their erstwhile enemies for the common good.

A final note:  “Cowboys & Aliens” boasts a list of writers, producers, executive producers, and production companies almost as long as its cast of thousands.  With that many cooks, it is no wonder that the stew verges on mish-mash.

Jack Rico

By

2011/07/21 at 12:00am

Ted Faraone

By

2011/07/21 at 12:00am

Friends with Benefits

07.21.2011 | By |

Friends with Benefits

It is sometimes amazing to see a well-worn Hollywood formula repackaged for the umpteenth time and still work.  Such is the case of “Friends with Benefits,” a star vehicle for Justin Timberlake (art director Dylan) and Mila Kunis (headhunter Jamie).  Before the opening titles there are two breakups:  Dylan’s girl in LA dumps him and Jamie’s boyfriend in New York dumps her — just as both are dragging their tardy guys to their favorite chick flicks.  Via a cute bit of editing (kudos to Tia Nolan) auds are led to believe briefly that it is one breakup — Dylan and Jamie — until the bi-coastal synchronicity sets in.  Both battle scarred veterans retire from the field.  No more romance for them.
 
Jamie lures Dylan to New York for a job interview to be the new art director of GQ Magazine.  He aces the interview.  The pair become fast friends — as in we like each other but there’s no sex.  That changes when Jamie utters, “God!  I want sex.”  Can two great friends have a sexual relationship that is “no relationship, no emotions, just sex, whatever happens?”  Auds will quickly figure out the answer.  As Stephen Sondheim wrote in one of the lyrics to A Little Night Music, eventually the nets descend.  The questions for “Friends with Benefits” are “How long will the arrangement last?”, “When will the nets descend?”, and “What happens after the inevitable breakup?”
 
While skein is busy answering said questions, pic reveals itself as a valentine to New York City, which is as much a character as any of the cast.  In the opening reel Jamie takes Dylan on a tour of New York to sell him on leaving LA.  It’s full “fish out of water” Angelino in Gotham jokes, but it works — both cinematically and as a plot device.  Dylan is sold.  Good thing, too, because by the time they get to the “just sex” part, pic is on to its second reel.
 
It’s nice to see Timberlake in a non-smarmy role, which he handles convincingly, but it is Kunis who steals her scenes as the tough, fast-talking, wisecracker.  Supporting roles are notable.  Patricia Clarkson does a star-turn as Jamie’s goofy, ex-hippie mom wherein there is a running gag about the nationality of Jamie’s dad.  Woody Harrelson has the unenviable task of being comic relief in a comedy.  His over-the-top gay sports editor sports more cliché gay jock jokes than your critic imagined exist.  To his credit, he plays the role big, bold, and farcical — think of Zach Galifianakis minus the annoying aspects.  Richard Jenkins as Dylan’s dad suffering the early stages of Alzheimer’s Disease and Jenna Elfman as sister Annie anchor pic’s serious scenes.  Jenkins comes across as sympathetic rather than pathetic.  Elfman has the least to work with but does well with what scribes Harley Peyton, David A. Newman, Keith Merryman and Will Gluck (who also directed) give her as the primary caregiver for dad and her son, a ten-year-old tuxedoed magician (Nolan Gould) whose trick failures are another one of pic’s myriad running gags.  In this regard “Friends with Benefits” bares careful scrutiny.  There are no loose ends.  Everything that happens in the picture happens for a reason and will probably happen again to move the plot along — or at least leave auds saying, “I knew that was coming.”  Sharp-eyed viewers will notice Paul Mazursky’s 1969 sexual revolution comedy, “Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice,” unspooling on a TV in the background of one scene.  It is one of pic’s many inside-film references.
 
Plot hinges on the overheard conversation, a truly shopworn device, but it gets the point across.  Jamie, unseen by Annie and Dylan, listens to Dylan argue with his sister that there is no relationship between Jamie and him; that the girl is damaged goods.  This leads to the inevitable breakup which takes place on Independence Day weekend at Dylan’s oceanfront boyhood home in what appears to be Santa Barbara.
 
Rest of pic’s 109 minutes are spent keeping auds guessing whether it will end as a romantic comedy (“Before Sunset”) or a weeper (“The Break-Up”).  Dénouement’s impetus comes from two characters both unlikely given their backgrounds and at the same time very likely given Hollywood tradition:  The parents.  Jenkins’ Mr. Harper in a lucid moment, punctuated by a perfectly timed gag, clarifies Dylan’s thinking.  Goofy, unreliable Lorna (Clarkson) does likewise for Jamie.  This plot trick has been done to death, but here it enjoys a resurrection.
 
“Friends with Benefits” is rated R.  For once the R rating is right.  There’s plenty of language and some pretty hot sex.  Children won’t understand it.  However, for adults it offers good lensing, adequate sound, and about a laugh a minute — even in the serious scenes.

Jack Rico

By

2011/07/13 at 12:00am

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

07.13.2011 | By |

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2’, the final installment of the most profitable film series in history, is not only the preeminent work of the saga, but it is one of the top ten films I have seen so far in 2011. The film is so well crafted I had to see it twice. And for those who think I am an obsessed zealot, my statement comes from a critic who has never read any – not one – of the tomes. I am clearly not a ‘pothead’, as hardcore Potter fans are referred to. You don’t have to be a fan of the books to appreciate it, it stands alone as a fantastic and entertaining film that one can understand and enjoy. This is not a good movie, this is a great movie and great movies need to be recognized for their artistry come award season. ‘The Deathly Hallows: Part 2’ should be considered as a Best Picture contender come the Oscars next year and should clearly score nods for Best Art Direction, Best Cinematography, Best Director, Best Original Score, Best Sound Mixing, Best Visual Effects and Best Adapted Screenplay. In the same way ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King’ won the top prize in 2004, ‘Potter 8’ should go out with a bang.

‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2’ is an action drama that is entertaining, intriguing and emotionally transfixing. Part 2 picks up where Part one’s quasi-epic-finale ends with Voldemort obtaining the Elder’s Wand from the coffin of Dumbledore. Potter needs to find three more horcruxes to kill his archenemy, but before he does that, our boy wizard will need the help of his friends, Hermione and Ron, to get back to Hogwarts and face old friends that are now traitors and discover the truth that will change his life forever. However, things won’t be easy, the battle between the good and evil forces of the wizarding world escalates into an all-out war and many loved friends die. It is Harry Potter who may be called upon to make the ultimate sacrifice as it all ends in a climactic showdown with Lord Voldemort for the future of Hogwarts and ultimately the world.

Throughout the last decade, beginning with director Christopher Columbus, these installments have at one point or another been nominated for many Oscars, particularly in the technical field. But none of them never have deserved the best film prize – until now. It is hard for movies with great commercial success to have a place amongst the best come award season, but that mentality is slowly changing. For example, Avatar recently did it and it was in 3D. So it can be done, but for the purposes of this argument, I’ll limit myself to Peter Jackson’s ‘The Lord of the Rings’ trilogy as source material. The parallels between the ‘Harry Potter’ series and Jackson’s three epic offerings have gone on for many years amongst connoisseurs. They are both considered Hollywood blockbuster films with gargantuan production budgets, they rely heavily on visual effects to bring to life their stories, their genres are also the same – action, drama, epic fantasies – and even the narratives stand on themes of underdog characters predestined to fight the ultimate battle of good versus evil. So if LOTR can win Best Picture, why can’t ‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2’?  The premise was as exhilarating and gripping as I can remember any movie this year, the special effects were once again dazzling, the soundtrack by Alexandre Desplat (The King’s Speech) set off chills, the script by Steve Kloves was an emotional and moving coaster ride, the direction of David Yates was managed with great skill, and even though no one actor will be nominated for an Oscar for their work, neither were the ones for ‘Lord of the Rings’, except Ian Mckellen, once. The year is young and we must await for the fall movies to be released in order to judge Potter’s sustainability amongst its competition, nevertheless, it must be part of the conversation.

Why it took the producers of the Potter series 8 movies to get the mix right might be attributed to these sequels not providing real conclusions which take a toll on a persons tolerance. You can also argue that most of the previous seven films were slow paced and, dare I say, boring. However, all the ingredients have come to fruition on this final chapter including the acting skills of the beloved protagonists. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint have come a long way since being pre-adolescents and they deliver wonderful and demonstrative performances that will manage to extract a tear or two from more than one spectator or fan.

I had the privilege of seeing the movie at the New York red carpet premiere and then again the next day at the Lowes Lincoln Square IMAX theater (which holds the largest IMAX screen in the world after Australia). Both were presented in 3D, but the 3D visuals were modest at best in the standard 3D screening during the premiere. Much of it probably had to do with the movie being converted to 3D in post-production as opposed to being shot in 3D. This ‘backdoor’ process usually provides a dull and dim experience too many who see it, but that wasn’t the case in the IMAX theater. The colors were so much more pristine and the 3D conversion was barely felt. It looked impressive. So if you’re looking to see it in 3D, make sure you see it in an IMAX screen, preferably the one in the aforementioned theater.

If ‘Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2’ is truly the last we will ever see of the cast and its crew then it was an unforgettable farewell to all of those who have stood by them throughout all these years. When we look back 10-20 years from now, hopefully we can all look admirably at this franchise with awe, and in particular, highlight this last film as the best of the series, and perhaps, one of the best films of 2011.

Jack Rico

By

2011/07/06 at 12:00am

Horrible Bosses

07.6.2011 | By |

Horrible Bosses

‘Horrible Bosses’ is a futile attempt by director Seth Gordon to create a modern version of The Three Stooges. It is also one of the most vexing, exasperating R rated comedies I have seen all year. It opens with the great promise of a clever film, a great cast and an enthralling ‘can’t wait to see this movie’ premise. But all it delivered was lame jokes, incomprehensible plot points, unrelenting idiocy and characters no one human can possibly relate to – well, besides wanting to kill your boss at one point in your life. Altogether, most of the jokes just didn’t work.

Jason Bateman plays management candidate Nick Hendricks who has been logging 12-hour days and taking all the abuse he can withstand from Dave Harken (Kevin Spacey) his boss with the promise of a well-earned promotion. But now he knows that’s never going to happen. Meanwhile, dental assistant Dale Arbus (Charlie Day) has been struggling to maintain his self-respect against the relentless X-rated advances of Dr. Julia Harris (Jennifer Aniston), when she suddenly turns up the heat. And accountant Kurt Buckman (Jason Sudeikis) has just learned that his company’s corrupt new owner, Bobby Pellit (Colin Farrell), is not only bent on ruining his career but plans to funnel toxic waste into an unsuspecting population, after the unfortunate death of his father (Donald Sutherland). Their plan isn’t to quit their gigs, but to murder their bosses. So, on the strength of a few-too-many drinks and some dubious advice from ‘Motherfucker Jones’ (Jamie Foxx), a hustling ex-con whose street cred is priced on a sliding scale, the guys devise a convoluted but foolproof plan to rid the world of their respective employers… permanently. But even the best-laid plans are only as good as the brains behind them.

The promise of the premise alone is enough to attract people to the film, without having to hire A list comedians, because it relies singlehandedly on a story that almost anyone can identify with. As long as people can relate to a subject matter, you have half of the battle won. Disappointingly, the premise becomes diluted by all types of artificial writer devices to draw laughs and the film ultimately collapses under it.

The whole film felt comically forced and passé. The jokes felt engineered and seemed to be dictated by the success of today’s R rated comedies instead of the freshness that they initially brought.

The key problem with ‘Horrible Bosses’ though begins with Dale Arbus’s self-righteous storyline played by ordinary man Charlie Day (It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia) who is engaged to an ordinary looking woman. As you already know, the premise behind the film is about people who hate their bosses so much that they have decided they are going to kill them. But as you read above, the notion of an engaged heterosexual man being disgusted by the thought that his unbelievably hot female boss wants to bed him therefore wanting to kill her is abnormal. Yes, I understand his character is a nice guy who doesn’t want to cheat, but to want to kill her for this? No one is going to buy it. Not even women… unless he is secretly gay. Oh yes, somehow, screenwriters Michael Markowitz, John Francis Daley and Jonathan M. Goldstein thought this plot line was funny. A drop dead gorgeous woman breaking the law, endangering her career and acting like a porn star over an average looking joe is not funny. It’s ridiculous. Yes, men would all love it, but we know it will never happen. Somehow they have confused the idea of ridiculous for hilarity. What would have worked and created a sense of realistic tension is for Dale to have to bed a hideous, unsightly woman. At that point all men would relate to him, something I couldn’t do throughout the whole movie. Movies are about the willing ‘suspension of disbelief’, the idea of infusing enough semblance of truth into a skeptical situation to convince a viewer to suspend judgment, even for a moment, about the implausibility of the narrative. None of that existed here. To have this be part of the principal plot was an affecting and inane decision.

But by no means is ‘Horrible Bosses’ unwatchable. I think the team meant well. It just wasn’t thought out well enough to live up to its potential. To be fair, its most clever parts are arguably during the opening, Bateman and Spacey’s interaction, the Jamie Foxx encounter, and bits and pieces towards its denouement. That is perhaps a total of 20-25 minutes of cleverness, not enough to pay for in today’s high priced movie ticket market.

Perhaps Seth Gordon won’t admit it or not, but there was an “inspired by…” The Three Stooges angle somewhere in here. These seemingly coherent men somehow are massive idiots when it comes to executing the basic functions of a plan. It begs the question – how did they get their jobs?

I must confess that the cast ensemble was a big coup. We haven’t seen Kevin Spacey play the big bad boss so convincingly since ‘Swimming with Sharks’ (1994) and ‘Glengary Glenn Ross’ (1992). But perhaps the biggest gift the producers have given film history is Jennifer Aniston’s sexually charged potty mouth that will be impressed into the memories of every man and lesbian that watches this. The sexual vile that comes out of her lips is lasciviously filthy. So why didn’t this movie do better then? It goes to show you that even a great cast and potent individual characters don’t always make for a great movie. All the ingredients were there though to pull this off. I’m curious to know what would have been the fate of this film had it been in more dexterous hands such as Judd Apatow.

I really wanted to like ‘Horrible Bosses’ and even though it was a good try, the reigning 2011 best R rated comedy is still ‘Bridesmaids’, which fused the best of everything, including Apatow.

Jack Rico

By

2011/07/05 at 12:00am

Larry Crowne

07.5.2011 | By |

Larry Crowne
Jack Rico

By

2011/06/17 at 12:00am

Green Lantern

06.17.2011 | By |

Green Lantern
Jack Rico

By

2011/06/01 at 12:00am

Beginners

06.1.2011 | By |

Beginners
Mario Torres

By

2011/05/31 at 12:00am

X-Men: First Class

05.31.2011 | By |

X-Men: First Class

I like comic book movies. I don’t read comics, but as far as movies go, there is always something entertaining about one character, or a group, going through or adapting to an unimaginable change.

X Men: First Class is an excellent comic book movie, for those expecting nothing more. Great action sequences, interesting character chemistry and hints of humor make the Professor X’s clan (or shall I say Magneto?) a very enjoyable 130 minutes.

Let me not give you the wrong impression, this is Magneto’s movie… The rest of the characters live in the world, but in a way, they seem to revolve around him, whether right from the beginning or towards the end.

As we start the movie, it feels like we are watching two movies intersecting one another, and it works beautifully thanks to director Matthew Vaughn (Kick Ass, Layer Cake), who like Bryan Singer (the original director for this and now producer), has developed a very keen sense of showing parallel stories that later convene. 

It’s Poland, 1944, and the scene is practically the same as the one we saw in the first X-Men movie. Kid gets separated from his parents, bends fence, gets knocked down… but, what happens next? What follows clearly states what will happen during the rest of the movie, along with witnessing how Erik/Magneto’s evil psyche is born right in front of us because of Kevin Bacon’s character Sebastian Shaw.

Kevin Bacon… he really does his best to be an evil villain, but I liked him as a villain more in the movie “Super”.

On the other side of the world, Westchester, New York, we simply see how Charles Xavier, as a young man, discovers an intruder that looks like his mom, but it’s really Raven/Mystique. And… yes, that is his introduction and Raven’s as well. How Raven ended up in his kitchen, in the middle of the night, in that same house that is in the middle of a forest, is beyond me, but let’s move along.

 

James McAvoy is charming as Charles Xavier. In the following scenes about 20 years later, his innocence, which will eventually be a character trait that will separate him from Magneto, is clearly established as he tries to chat up a girl at a bar in Oxford using his powers. While this happens, Erik, with a very dark, but bland portrayal by Michael Fassbender, is trying to hunt down the person that created and destroyed him, Sebastian Shaw. This takes him to France and Argentina, where he finds out more information about his nemesis.

 

As if this were not enough, Rose Byrne (who seems to be in every movie lately), is a “sexy” CIA agent tracking down Sebastian Shaw, and while she gets close, she witnesses Shaw and his crew of mutants displaying her powers. Where did Sebastian find this crew of mutants? Again, we don’t know. He seems to have a pretty close relationship with them, but let’s move along.

After seeing this, Byrne’s character, Agent MacTaggert, literally says she needs an “expert in genetic mutation”, and who you gonna call? Charles Xavier. She follows Charles to the same bar, and he uses the same line he used previously to pick up MacTaggert. It doesn’t work, she goes straight to business. Charles willingly joins her team, along with Raven. In the CIA’s operation to catch Sebastian Shaw with the mutants help, they meet Erik as he tries to stop Shaw as well, but fails and Charles saves his life.

The movie takes a comedic turn after their meeting as they formalize the mutant team and Oliver Platt, in a very minor character, helps them settle into a research base. The recruiting sequence is a highlight and Wolverine makes an expected cameo with what is probably the best line of the movie, which I can’t say here (he was being rude).

The last unexpected turn of the movie is Sebastian Shaw’s visit to the research base where the young mutants are, which feels like a bit too long of an action sequence. I found interesting that he does not want to kidnap them, or tries to hurt them, he simply gives them a choice to choose sides, much like Magneto’s character. Some go, some stay, but since it is Magneto’s movie, these choices at the end seem irrelevant.

From here on forward, it is a simple evil vs. good training and fight sequences while establishing the crucial role Charles Xavier has in developing and caring for his “students”.

The relationship between Erik and Charles takes a hit at the very end, and while Charles tries to maintain the peace, it is too late for Erik to go back and not hate the humans (although his nemesis, Shaw, was a mutant too… but let’s move along), so they split sides.

Matthew Vaughn is a good storyteller, and while the second half of the movie lacks the same interest than the beginning, he knows how to handle it. The movie is consistent, and if I were a comic book fan, I am pretty sure I would have liked it even more. Two things before I leave you: look out for a Rebecca Romjin cameo, it’s quick, but amusing; and there is no additional scene after the credits roll, so you get to leave to the bathroom early. I only tell you because I wish I had known…

Jack Rico

By

2011/05/26 at 12:00am

The Hangover 2

05.26.2011 | By |

The Hangover 2
Select a Page