Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Reviews for DVD Releases

Mack Chico

By

2009/07/14 at 12:00am

The Haunting in Connecticut

07.14.2009 | By |

Rating: 1.5

Rated: PG-13 for some intense sequences of terror and disturbing images.
Release Date: 2009-03-27
Starring: Adam Simon, Tim Metcalfe
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.hauntinginconnecticut.com/

 Go to our film page

The Haunting in Connecticut is a tedious and pedestrian film that gives ghost stories a bad name. Director Peter Cornwell‘s film is so bereft of substance that when it comes to generating atmosphere and scares, an inordinate abundance of “frightful” moments are needed to keep viewers attentive. Assessing the film’s capacity for entertainment,  ‘The Haunting in Connecticut’ is a tough task to like.

The film relies on the “based on a true story” crutch, which is a good indication that the movie is in trouble. This story focuses on a family forced to relocate near a clinic where their teenage son was being treated for cancer. The family begins experiencing violent, supernatural events that the parents first blame on stress from the illness, but they later discover that their new home is a former mortuary with a dark past.

Perhaps most vexing is the script’s directives of having the protagonists go back to their separate beds and try to sleep amongst all the specters and spooky occurrences that are happening in their new quarters. Have any of the filmmakers ever heard of rational when it comes to writing these horror movies? Besides that, the ‘mystery’ is void of mystery, flashback sequences are laughable and the special effects for the ectoplasm are sad. Follow that with some over-the-top acting and unintentionally hilarious dialogue and you have yourself a monumental failure.

It’s hard to imagine horror fans will like this. It’s poorly made and badly written. Nevertheless, it does offer some suspenseful moments, but never enough to justify the price of admission. The PG-13 rating assures that nothing overtly gruesome or shocking is shown. Everything is sanitized so younger viewers can gaze upon it without going blind.

Jack Rico

By

2009/07/07 at 12:00am

The Unborn

07.7.2009 | By |

Rating: 1.0

Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and terror, disturbing images, thematic material and language including some sexual references.
Release Date: 2009-01-09
Starring: David S. Goyer
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.theunbornmovie.net/

 Go to our film page

Jack Rico

By

2009/06/09 at 12:00am

Gran Torino

06.9.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.5

Rated: R for language throughout, and some violence.
Release Date: 2008-12-12
Starring: Nick Schenk
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: NULL

 Go to our film page

Gran Torino is an amazingly over-the-top anti-racism parable but, despite its obvious shortcomings, it is nevertheless effective and affecting. The storytelling style is old fashioned in what it does and unsubtle in the way it goes about doing it, and Eastwood doesn’t plumb any new depths in his stereotyped portrayal of the film’s central character. Yet, perhaps because the ending doesn’t unspool quite as expected and perhaps because the film has something to say (even if it is presented with a heavy hand), it’s hard to deny that Gran Torino works on a certain level. This is far from Eastwood’s best work as a director, but it’s a respectable effort and is more successful that his tepid earlier 2008 effort, Changeling.

 

Walt Kowalski (Clint Eastwood) is an unpleasant old coot. Following the death of his wife, he has lived alone with his dog. He is barely on speaking terms with his sons and grandchildren, and the neighborhood in which he lives is changing, becoming more ethnically diverse and troubled by gangs. He has a less-than-cordial relationship with the Asian family next door, and it becomes even colder when the son, Thao (Bee Vang), attempts to steal Walt’s 1972 Gran Torino as part of a gang initiation. He fails when Walt shows up with a rifle. Later, when the gang members arrive to give Thao a “second chance” and a fight breaks out, Walt and his rifle are again on hand and he drives the gang-bangers off. This results in Walt playing the role of reluctant hero. He is soon visited regularly by Thao’s smart and spirited older sister, Sue (Ahney Her). And Thao, as a penance for his attempted theft, is forced to work for Walt. This leads to some bonding and a growing realization on Walt’s part that, as long as the gang is around, Theo’s future is not secure.

 

Gran Torino uses the familiar cross-generational buddy formula as its foundation. As Walt imparts important life lessons to Thao (including how to interact with others in a “manly” fashion), Thao opens the heart of the bigoted misanthrope. Ultimately, this becomes a story about overcoming prejudice. In this, the film lathers things on a little too thickly. The transformation occurs too easily and with too little motivation. Yes, Walt gains his redemption – which is the point of the movie – but it’s questionable how effective the screenplay is in selling that redemption. Maybe we buy into it because of Eastwood or because we always like to see Scrooge wake up on Christmas morning and save Tiny Tim.

 

Speaking of Eastwood, his name has been mentioned alongside the phrase “Best Actor nomination” in a number of places, but to award the venerable filmmaker/actor with such a tribute in this case would be an injustice. Eastwood is playing a variation of Dirty Harry – a hard-bitten loner who at times is so over-the-top nasty that he borders on self-parody, such as when he literally growls when someone does something of which he disapproves. While it’s true that the character arc forces Walt to exhibit a new open-mindedness, there’s nothing exceptionally complex in Eastwood’s approach to the material. He played a similar role to better effect in Million Dollar Baby.

 

While Eastwood may not deserve acting plaudits, a case can be made for his two Asian co-stars. As Thao, Bee Vang shows more growth and development of personality than Walt. He and Eastwood evidence the right amount of chemistry – certainly enough to allow us to believe that they care for each other against all odds. Ahney Her is a real find – bright and energetic, she brings pizzazz to the role and shines brightest during a scene when Sue is giving Walt a walk-through of her house and parrying his racist remarks with well-aimed quips. Walt and Thao may be Gran Torino‘s lead characters, but Sue is the one we’re most likely to remember long after the end credits have expired.

 

The film gets points for its unconventional resolution, which I will not disclose here. Suffice it to say that this is a rare movie that doesn’t implode during the last reel; the filmmaking team obviously put some thought into the best way to construct the conclusion. There are some emotional moments and tears are not necessarily inappropriate although, as previously mentioned, it’s questionable whether the movie earns all of the tissues that will be used on its behalf. As parables go, this one is almost shockingly obvious but, in thinking about it, it’s not that far away from Million Dollar Baby, with both films featuring key interactions between Eastwood’s character and a priest. And, while Eastwood may not turn in a great performance, he’s a strong reliable presence whose participation somehow makes it okay to shed those tears. Despite its flaws, I appreciate Gran Torino, although I do so more with my heart than with my head.

Jack Rico

By

2009/06/09 at 12:00am

The International

06.9.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.5

Rated: R for some sequences of violence and language.
Release Date: 2009-02-13
Starring: Eric Singer
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA, Germany
Official Website: http://www.everybodypays.com/

 Go to our film page

The International is a complicated film with an intricate plot line and lackluster acting. It’s only redeeming qualities are its action sequences and fast paced direction.

The premise is hard to follow: Interpol Agent Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) and Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) are determined to bring to justice one of the world’s most powerful banks. Uncovering myriad and reprehensible illegal activities, Salinger and Whitman follow the money from Berlin to Milan to New York to Istanbul. Finding themselves in a high-stakes chase across the globe, their relentless tenacity puts their own lives at risk as their targets will stop at nothing – even murder – to continue financing terror and war.

Naomi Watts gave the worst performance in her career. It’s as if she has become worse over the years beginning with King Kong. Clive Owen is no Jason Bourne, but is believable enough that the credibility of the film isn’t compromised.

Be ready for what will be the most talked about action sequence of the early new year – the Guggenheim museum shooting frenzy is well worth the watch.

For a production that aspires to be so much more than a typical thriller, The International’s convoluted premise and Naomi’s painful acting achieves only to convey an average movie experience.

Alex Florez

By

2009/06/02 at 12:00am

Revolutionary Road

06.2.2009 | By |

Rating: 4.0

Rated: R for language and some sexual content/nudity.
Release Date: 2008-12-26
Starring: Justin Haythe, Richard Yates
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:EE.UU, Reino Unido
Official Website: http://www.revolutionaryroadmovie.com/

 Go to our film page

Revolutionary Road is the dissection of an imploding marriage and a contemplation about life in surburbia. It’s a sad, grim movie that asks pointed questions about the compromises we make and the lies we tell in an effort to maintain a sense of equilibrium. And is it more courageous to face up to one’s responsibilities or to follow a dream, no matter how impossible it may seem?

It’s western Connecticut in 1955. Frank Wheeler (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his wife, April (Kate Winslet), are entering a dark period in their marriage. Communication between them has broken down and Frank has begun to stray with a co-worker (Zoe Kazan). He’s not happy with his job; he hates the work but needs the money to support April and his two children. Then, on his birthday, April presents Frank with a plan: sell their cozy house on Revolutionary Road and move to Paris. There, after leaving behind the “hopeless emptiness” of their current life, they can begin anew. April can work while Frank takes some time for self-discovery. He is initially enthused by the idea, but reality begins to intrude on the fantasy. Frank is offered a major promotion, and with it comes more money and more responsibility, and April learns that she is pregnant with the couple’s third child. Suddenly, Paris seems like a fairy tale and the union that had been buoyed by a spark of elusive hope, crashes and burns.

 

A lot of marriages are like this, with many of the fundamental problems not having changed in 50 years. Too many unions begun with hope and optimism degenerate into stale existences with two disconnected individuals living under the same roof. Today, many such couples divorce. In 1955, divorce was less common, so husbands and wives would argue and find ways to make temporary peace. It’s unfair to claim that the happy suburban family was (or is) an illusion, but the reality is not as perfect as the illusion. There are challenges to be overcome, one of the most prominent of which is the battle between following a dream and bringing home a healthy income. In the Wheelers’ marriage, Frank is the pragmatist and April is the dreamer. Their most searing conflicts are born out of the inherent opposition of those two natures.

Watching DiCaprio and Winslet, it’s hard to remember that these were the star-crossed lovers in Titanic. Their on-screen relationship here is more real and brittle – not the kind of marriage some viewers would hope for from Rose and Jack. The actors use their chemistry (they are great friends) to forge an underlying sense of affection between Frank and April, but the fractures are deep and widening. These are believable, flawed people and, as in situations like this, fault can be generously apportioned. It’s possible to understand both sides. Assigning blame is as difficult as determining the solution. Winslet’s performance is more emotive than DiCaprio’s, but that’s because of the nature of her character. Both portrayals are credible and, while Winslet’s performance in The Reader is probably more likely to gain Oscar consideration than her work as April, it seems unfair to single out one over the other.

Revolutionary Road is dramatically potent material and, although it poses a number of philosophical questions, it works best as an unsentimental examination of a marriage in crisis. Because the actors are expert, Mendes understands the subject matter, and the source material is so meticulous, we are left emotionally impacted but without a sense of having been manipulated. Revolutionary Road is a fine motion picture, but it’s not a good choice to lighten a burden or brighten a night. It rewards in the ways that only tragedies can.

Mack Chico

By

2009/06/02 at 12:00am

Defiance

06.2.2009 | By |

Rating: 0.0

Rated: R for violence and language.
Release Date: 2009-01-16
Starring: Clayton Frohman, Edward Zwick
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.defiancemovie.com/

 Go to our film page

For some reason, the Nazis are popular during the holiday season of 2008. They occupy central positions in Valkyrie and Good, flitter around the periphery of The Reader, and are rarely seen but very much present in Defiance. Edward Zwick’s adaptation of the true-to-life story of Nechama Tec’s book about the Bielski partisans, this movie is less about the struggle against the Nazis than it is about the fight for survival. Although there are battles, Defiance spends most of its time exploring the difficulties of surviving as fugitives in the midst of a Soviet winter.

The year is 1941 and the place is Belarus. Hitler is on the move pushing eastward and the Final Solution is underway. The four surviving Beilski brothers – Tuvia (Daniel Craig), Zus (Liev Schreiber), Asael (Jamie Bell), and Aron (George MacKay) – are forced to hide in the woods after the local police, in collaboration with the Germans, kill the rest of the family. But the Beilskis’ time on the run is not destined to be spent alone. Like moths to the flame, other Jewish refugees are drawn to them, until they are more like a dispossessed community than a ragtag group. The bigger the camp gets, the more problems arise. Tuvia and Zus openly clash, with the former advocating a largely peaceful philosophy and the latter wanting to get bloody. Disease, starvation, and cold threaten health and lives as the autumn deepens into winter. And the Germans are on the hunt, offering a reward and seeking the location where Tuvia and the Bielski partisans are holed up.

The principal flaw of Defiance is that some of the high-minded sentiments voiced by Tuvia in flowery speeches seem too noble and unrealistic for the circumstances. Also, while there’s nothing specifically wrong with Daniel Craig’s performance, it can be a little difficult accepting the actor as a Jew. One suspects Craig’s participation in the film might have been a concession to its getting the financing needed. After all, the rest of the cast is not populated by household names. Although Craig has the lion’s share of the screen time as well as the plum role, Liev Schreiber provides the most memorable performance – a forceful turn as the conflicted, least idealistic of the Beilski brothers.

The battle scenes are well choreographed and contain enough uncertainty to make them genuinely exciting, but one would expect no less from a man who has overseen Civil War engagements (Glory) and Japanese strife (The Last Samurai). More compelling, however, is the drama associated with the establishment and maintenance of the Bielski partisans’ refugee camp, situated deep in a forest during one of the most inhospitable times of the year. Not only are there problems with famine brought on by the inability to grow anything in the freezing cold, but an epidemic of typhus runs rampant through the community. Zwick re-creates each new crisis with immediacy and doesn’t bypass other less life-and-death elements of life: faith in God under such trying circumstances; love, sex, and marriage (three of the four brothers become emotionally connected to female refugees); and the friction that occurs between the Bielski group and other partisans in the area. The TV ads for Defiance make it seem like the movie centers on a series of guerilla attacks on the Nazis but, in reality, those moments are a small part of the wider tapestry Zwick has stitched together out of a combination of true history and dramatic license.

Defiance makes explicit the parallelism between a group of Jews fleeing from Nazi death squads and the Exodus. One rabbi prays that God will release the Jews from the curse of being the chosen people so they can stop running and being persecuted. However, the film runs the risk of overplaying its hand when one character remarks on the lack of supernatural intervention in parting the waters during a journey through swamplands.

Central to the film’s effectiveness is the transformation of Tuvia from idealist to pragmatist. While he never reaches the level of callousness and brutality displayed by Zus, events force him to reconsider the price of showing mercy. Craig handles the performance well enough for us to believe this character development, but this isn’t his best work (for my money, that can be found in either Layer Cake or Casino Royale). Ultimately, the film works not just because of the character arc it provides for its main character but for its ultimate theme of the triumph over adversity. In Exodus, Moses led the Hebrews out of captivity. Who would have suspected that in this tale, the role of Moses would be played by James Bond?

Jack Rico

By

2009/05/21 at 12:00am

Valkyrie

05.21.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.5

Rated: PG-13 for violence and brief strong language.
Release Date: 2008-12-26
Starring: Christopher McQuarrie, Nathan Alexander
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA, Germany
Official Website: http://valkyrie.unitedartists.com/

 Go to our film page

Mack Chico

By

2009/05/21 at 12:00am

Paul Blart: Mall Cop

05.21.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.5

Rated: PG for some violence, mild crude and suggestive humor, and language.
Release Date: 2009-01-16
Starring: Kevin James, Nick Bakay
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: NULL

 Go to our film page

After stumbling through a lackluster first 30 minutes that features all the tepid humor one might reasonably expect from a mediocre comedy, Paul Blart: Mall Cop does something unexpected: it becomes watchable, perhaps even passably enjoyable. That’s because this movie elevates its objective from lampooning mall security guards to satirizing one of Hollywood’s biggest genres: the action/crime movie. In particular, Die Hard. To be sure, the iconic 1988 Bruce Willis film has been the subject of numerous big-screen parodies during the past two decades, but none has succeeded as well as this one. Considering the dubious quality of many of them, that could be considered damning with faint praise. And, although Paul Blart is by no means great cinema, there is amusement to be uncovered as we watch Kevin James bumble his way through actions oh-so-similar to those navigated with more blood, sweat, profanity, and dead bodies than Willis. Too bad there’s no “Yippekayay…,” but this is rated PG.

 

Paul Blart (Kevin James) is a rent-a-cop at a North Jersey mall. He doesn’t get to carry a gun but he has a Segway to ride around on. Paul’s ultimate dream is to join the New Jersey State police force, but hypoglycemia has thus far prevented him from completing the physically draining entrance exam. There’s another point of dissatisfaction in Paul’s life: he’s lonely and dreams of finding Ms. Right, even though the on-line dating service in which his daughter (Raini Rodriguez) has enrolled him keeps telling him “You have no matches.” Paul has his eye on Amy (Jayma Mays), the operator of a new kiosk at the mall, but he lacks the gumption to approach her. Meanwhile, he has the task of training a new security guard: Veck (Keir O’Donnell), who’s only on duty because he couldn’t get accepted for any other job. On Black Friday, however, Paul’s life undergoes a radical change when terrorists take over the mall, locking the police out. The only one in a position to help the hostages and apprehend the bad guys is Paul.

 

I admit to having looked at my watch a few too many times during the movie’s prolonged opening act as we “get to know” Paul. Like most one-dimensional comedy protagonists, he’s not really worth spending so much introductory time with. The scenes of him going about his daily mall patrol duties, while arguably necessary to the setup, are rather dull. Kevin James imbues Paul with more likeability than we would get from, say, Adam Sandler, but it’s a generic role. The film takes off, however, when it gets to the Die Hard stuff. This is actually a pretty clever way to rework the basic scenario of John McClane trapped on his own with a group of terrorists in a building. Paul Blart: Mall Cop refers either directly or indirectly to Die Hard numerous times (I can see a drinking game here…), and it’s amusing to recognize how minimal tweaks can convert thrills into laughs.

 

The PG rating assures that the violence will be limited and cartoonish. There’s a nod to this when Paul, apparently injured, peels back his shirtsleeve to reveal a tiny cut (upon which he places a childish band-aid). Would the film have been funnier had it been more graphic? Perhaps, but the essential innocence of the proceedings defuses anything resembling tension. Those who enjoy Paul Blart: Mall Cop will be watching purely for its comedic and satiric value, not because there’s any inherent interest in how the storylines will be resolved.

 

Kevin James possesses the Teddy Bear factor that served John Candy well. Like Candy, James is a big man and plays characters with big hearts. He’s a refreshing change from the Sandlers and Carreys who have dominated motion picture comedies with their often mean-spirited antics over the past 1 1/2 decades. And, unlike Will Ferrell, James isn’t in a perpetual state of arrested adolescence. He’s a regular guy. That’s his charm. Here, he’s a schlub who deserves more out of life but takes pride in the lowliest of jobs: being a mall security job. The term “loveable loser” was coined for this sort of individual.

 

I’m not going to claim that Paul Blart: Mall Cop deserves placement on anyone’s movie schedule ahead of the many fine Oscar bait films against which it is competing. It’s a juvenile motion picture designed primarily for a juvenile audience. But there’s a little more here than one might reasonably expect and that makes it a passable choice for watching at home, when viewers tend to be less demanding. Certainly, the question of what Die Hard would have been like in a suburban mall with Kevin James as the hero offers the potential of a diverting 90 minutes. To the extent that this is Paul Blart: Mall Cop‘s goal, it can’t be said to have failed.

Mack Chico

By

2009/05/21 at 12:00am

My Bloody Valentine 3-D

05.21.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.0

Rated: R for graphic brutal horror violence and grisly images throughout, some strong sexuality, graphic nudity and language.
Release Date: 2009-01-16
Starring: Todd Farmer, Zane Smith
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.mybloodyvalentinein3d.com/

 Go to our film page

Alex Florez

By

2009/05/13 at 12:00am

Taken

05.13.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.0

Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence, disturbing thematic material, sexual content, some drug references and language.
Release Date: 2009-01-30
Starring: Luc Besson, Robert Mark Kamen
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:France
Official Website: http://www.takenmovie.com/

 Go to our film page

 

For years now, french filmmaker Luc Besson (The Transporter) has been hemorrhaging preposterous action films that are wildly unsophisticated in their storytelling but that are also inexplicably entertaining.  Taken is no exception. 

Yet the Besson-written screenplay is directed by another frenchmen, Pierre Morel, who at least for this film, happens to share his exact same sensibility:  A reckless disregard for character development because the order of the day is a ‘shoot-em up thriller’.

Unsurprisingly then, the film’s premise is pretty straightforward. It centers on a former government operative named Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) who is on the hunt for a fearsome organization that has taken his daughter Kim (Maggie Grace), with whom he has just started to rekindle a relationship with.  After being absent for most of her life, Mills will terrorize all of Paris hunting down the band of kidnappers to prove his fatherhood.

Despite its slow beginning, hokey dialogue, and poor acting on everyone’s account (Maggie Grace being especially unbearable), the film doesn’t ever pretend to be more than it really is. It’s just strange to see Neeson, such an accomplished actor, playing the type of role usually reserved for people like Jason Statham. 

I know what I’m getting into when when I watch these films and so I’m rarely disappointed.  And If you have the slightest appetite for the genre, then it should be an easy 90 minutes of film to watch.

Taken is the type of film that easily gets filed under the ‘really bad films I’d watch category’.

Select a Page