Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Movie Reviews

Jack Rico

By

2012/04/06 at 12:00am

Titanic 3D

04.6.2012 | By |

Titanic 3D

Coinciding with the centenary of the sinking of the transatlantic ship Titanic, director James Cameron returns us to the most famous ship in history, but now in 3D. His aim is to revive the magic of the film to audiences who saw it in its original theatrical release back in 1997, but also present it to a new generation of potential fans.

I will not bore you with the plot, since you should already know it, so let’s talk about the 3D implementation. Does it make this film better? Yes it does. Cameron has created perhaps the best 3D conversion in film history at a cost of $18 million dollars and over a year’s time of meticulous work. But besides this particular movie, there is usually a difference between a film shot in 3D and one converted to 3D – it’s cheaper and less effective. The  three-dimensional effects are weakened when the film is not shot in stereography cameras and the viewer’s eye might notice the defect. It can take away from the experience you are paying for.

In the opening scenes, the quality you can notice the spectacular conversion, as if it were shot in 3D back in 1997. The three hours of Titanic will still make you sigh, tie you up in knots, crying again all the way until the end of the credits.

Titanic‘ is a classic, and arguably one of the best films in cinematic history. Defending this point are its accomplishments: winner of 11 Oscars, including Best Picture and director, most expensive production ever in 1997, highest grossing film in history to the world for twelve consecutive years until ‘Avatar’, from Cameron beat it. The love story is just as strong, reminding us why it occupies a prominent place on our shelves and in our memories… and in 3D it’s much better.

Jack Rico

By

2012/04/06 at 12:00am

American Reunion

04.6.2012 | By |

American Reunion

 

‘American Reunion’, the new sequel from the ‘American Pie’ franchise of 1999, is a nostalgic film that fails to reach the heights of laughter as its original predecessor. The laughs are sporadic and the attachment to the characters are not the same. Both reasons are rooted in the argument that the best of this friendship tale has passed its expiration date.

The last time we saw most of the original cast assembled was in 2003 in ‘American Wedding’, perhaps the filthiest in the entire series. This time we see the characters come together, probably for the last time for a reunion at their high school graduation. The plot goes like this: Over a decade has passed and the gang return to East Great Falls, Michigan, for the weekend. They will discover how their lives have developed as they gather for their high school reunion. How has life treated Michelle, Jim, Heather, Oz, Kevin, Vicky, Finch, Stifler, and Stifler’s mom? In the summer of 1999, it was four boys on a quest to lose their virginity. Now Kara is a cute high school senior looking for the perfect guy to lose her virginity to.

The reasons to see this film are the same reasons that many went to see the last three parts, plus the straight to DVD releases – for it’s denigrating, black humor, obscenities and gratuitous nudity. These elements are still part of the essence of the film but it is marked by the maturity of the characters, that somehow or other, weakens the comedy.

However, many fans will be fixed to what the film represents on a nostalgic level – reliving their happy past, remembering the old days, together with friends and the first time they saw a comedy so daring and bold.

Vulgar material aside, the producers injected a certain levelheadedness to every character in their central theme. The lead story is that of Jim and Michelle who have a son and are having marital problems. Conceptually, this should connect with fans of the movie who are now parents, but I object to that view because the reason that we clung on to these characters was because of their irreverent youth, disrespect, and irresponsibility that their ages brought. By removing those characteristics, the whole attraction is no longer the same and the film is directed to a whole other crowd altogether.

Judging the movie objectively, its rude comedy does occasionally entertain and seeing the ‘reunion’ of the original actors, even though aged, is a welcome sight. I woudn’t pay to see the movie in theaters, but seeing it on DVD, at a cheaper price is a sensible option that will save you some bucks.

Jack Rico

By

2012/03/29 at 12:00am

Mirror, Mirror

03.29.2012 | By |

Mirror, Mirror

If you are curious to know what is one of the worst films of 2012, no need to look further than ‘Mirror, Mirror’ from director Tarsem Singh, the same man who directed the visually stunning ‘The Fall’ and ‘Immortals 3D,’ and whom some consider to be an artist. So then how did this debacle occur? The studio, Relativity Media, decided to go for an infantile version of the Snow White story targeted at 2 year olds, so it seems, thus creating a silly, soporific and unmemorable piece of cinema for anyone else to enjoy.

In celebration of the 200 years of the birth of the Brothers Grimm story ‘Snow White’ in 1812, ‘Mirror, Mirror’ has the objective of offering a fresh and supposedly funny retelling of the Snow White legend. After a beloved King (Sean Bean) vanishes, his ruthless wife (Julia Roberts) seizes control of the kingdom and keeps her beautiful 18-year-old stepdaughter, Snow White (Lily Collins), hidden away in the palace. But when the princess attracts the attention of a charming and wealthy visiting prince (Armie Hammer), the jealous Queen banishes the girl to a nearby forest. Taken in by a band of rebellious but kindhearted dwarfs, Snow White blossoms into a brave young woman determined to save her country from the Queen. With the support of her new friends, she roars into action to reclaim her birthright and win back her Prince in this magical adventure comedy that will capture the hearts and imaginations of audiences the world over.

Julia Roberts is the only saving grace of this mishandled foul up. She is unequivocally charismatic, and for the first time, can rile up the disdain from the bottom of my bottoms. Lily Collins, our princess Snow White, is beautiful and innocent. Regrettably, this is Robert’s movie, removing any chance of her to shine or to see if she could feature any thespian ability.

Armie Hammer hasn’t acted much in Hollywood, but he already reached a nadir that can only be cleansed with a cask of Sailor Jerry’s rum. All you need to see to agree is the ‘puppy love’ scene. Nuff’ said. There goes a promising career. Nathan Lane, a Broadway veteran is a living, breathing cartoon. His casting choice behooves the film perfectly. The dwarves, and they are too many to mention, are not fuzzy nor enchanting.  They provide most of the comic relief and fail miserably at it.

The screenplay by Melissa Wallack and Jason Keller is vacuous and uninspired, a true shame to such a classic and indelible story. There really is nothing engaging here worth the time for teenagers or even parents besides spending the money as a replacement for a babysitter. If it is family entertainment you’re looking for ‘Dolphin Tale‘ or the new ‘Winnie the Pooh‘ are excellent choices on DVD. But if you are still relishing a modern take on Snow White, I’d wait until June 1st and savor ‘Snow White and the Huntsman’, an action adventure, state of the art visual phenomenon.

In short, Singh’s ‘Mirror, Mirror’ is an attempt to do a live action film with an animation sensibility, one that highlights inimical traits such as exaggerated gestures, embarrassing dialogue and a stilted romance that never convinces. Next!

Karen Posada

By

2012/03/29 at 12:00am

Wrath of the Titans

03.29.2012 | By |

Wrath of the Titans

There’s very few times when a sequel is better than the original, but this is true for ‘Wrath of the Titans’.  This probably has to do with the fact that it has a new director, Jonathan Liebesman, as well as different screenwriters, Dan Mazeau and David Johnson. Obviously, this helped it tremendously as the original ‘Clash of the Titans’ had a flat storyline and other various problems that made it very hard to like. This sequel has a storyline that is more captivating and nutritious, it also has some mighty shots of various horrifying monsters that made the action all the more interesting. The screening I went to was 3D, which didn’t really enhance the movie as the 3D work was not good and this could be because of the fact that it was converted into a 3D film, it wasn’t shot as one.

 

This second film picks up with Perseus (Sam Worthington) a decade after his last adventure, although he’s a demigod he’s decided to live life as a fisherman and as the single father of Helius (John Bell). His calm life begins to change when his father, Zeus (Liam Neeson) comes to ask him for help, the gods have weakened since people have lost faith and they are losing control of their prisoners in the underworld: Hades (Ralph Fiennes) and the titans. Perseus refuses but is forced to come into action when the unstoppable wrath begins. He recruits the help of Queen Andromeda (Rosamund Pike) and Agenor (Toby Kebbell). Together they go on a journey in which if they don’t succeed the world will cease to exist along with them and their gods.

 

We get a couple of new characters in the story; one of the most exciting ones is Zeus’ godly son Ares (Edgar Ramírez). This Venezuelan born actor plays the god of war just how mythology and his title describe it. It is great to see a Hispanic playing a big role in a blockbuster film like this one. Another note worthy fact is that a big portion of the film was shot in the Canary Island of Tenerife, one more reason to like the film. The main actor, Worthington for the most part does well with action films and so this role fits him. I would also say this sequel fits Neeson better, as I thought it was embarrassing that he was involved in the previous film.

 

One thing I enjoyed about this film more were the monsters, they were so much more real and detailed. The diversity of them also really added to the story, along with the fact that in this film we have more than one fighter getting rid of them. Like mentioned before, the 3D might have been an element that took away from the film. Also, there are certain parts of the story that are supposed to be complicated but somehow end up having an easy solution, which I’m not sure was fitting. The film also should have worked a little more in relationships, as most characters seemed to lack emotion in certain places that merited it.

 

This film is just fun to watch because you are taken on a mythological journey, where you are surrounded by gods, monsters and powerful humans (both men and women) who together make for a fascinating story. Although this film is much better than its’ predecessor, is not to say it is the best action film of 2012 but nonetheless it is entertaining and will take you on a wild adventure for a short 99 minutes.     

   

Karen Posada

By

2012/03/29 at 12:00am

Intruders

03.29.2012 | By |

Intruders

Intruders’ categorizes itself as a horror film, but I would say it’s more like a psychological thriller; because it has very few scares in it. The film develops in a mysterious way and creates a lot of suspense, which works well. The problem is that when it unwinds although it explains the plot, we are still confused instead of being scared to death. What I like most about this movie is that it’s bilingual; it is half in English and half in Spanish. It has two stories that develop simultaneously which help the public to get sucked in. But, unfortunately it doesn’t reach the goal that it sets to achieve.

 

The plot of the film focuses on two children, Juan (Izán Corchero) who lives in Madrid, and Mia (Ella Purnell) who lives in London. Both are haunted by a nightmare of a man “hollow face”, who visits them at night coming out of their closets. Mia’s dad, John (Clive Owen) desperately tries to help his daughter, after he himself sees this man who he thought was in his daughter’s imagination. The story is not as simple as it seems and the more it develops the more mysteries it reveals.

 

When director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo told me in our interview, that he wanted to make a global film, with characters that faced their fears, I immediately understood what he meant because that is something that he clearly accomplished. I have to give him credit for developing the same story in two different countries, with two diverse languages and cultures because he did this in a fluid and organized manner. To me it was a little strange to see Owen playing this kind of semi-vulnerable character, although without a doubt his best characters are always mysterious like this one. One thing we have to mention is the fact that having a big time Hollywood actor in a movie directed by a Spaniard in a bilingual film as the main actor is wonderful, this continues to show the importance and influence Hispanics have at a global level.

 

The twists in the film are interesting; the psychological part works because it takes the story to a level further than a kid’s story, the same goes for the background of the story. The problem is the connection between these; although it was well formulated they don’t give the necessary explanation or satisfaction.

 

Very few images in the film are scary, I can think of only two that are creepy, besides that the mystery in the story is what takes it forward more so than the scary scenes. I think Fresnadillo had a good idea and story, but he missed a connection, or explanation or something along those lines for the story and the public to have closure, because they are going to go home scratching their heads considering the contradictions it has. There’s no doubt that this film has good elements to become a good thriller, but it doesn’t have enough fuel to complete the cycle that would make it successful.

Karen Posada

By

2012/03/20 at 12:00am

The Hunger Games

03.20.2012 | By |

The Hunger Games

The biggest critics ‘The Hunger Games’ movie will have are the fans of the book, who will analyze every nook and cranny to make sure nothing was missed. As one of those fans, I will say I was satisfied with the finished product. I understand certain things need to get cut or changed around to fit better in the big screen and I wasn’t frustrated by the changes. No matter how much technology takes over the world, books will always have the upper hand, unless movies start getting a lot longer in order to be able to fit in every single detail.  A lot of movies that are based on books make it hard for the audience that hasn’t read the books to understand half of what’s going on, but this is not the case with this movie; ANYBODY can understand what’s going on most of the time because they did an excellent job at explaining the most important subjects.

 

The movie is set in a not so distant future in Panem, which was once North America, and is made up of 12 districts. Each district produces some sort of product to the Capitol of the nation. After past uprisings, the Capitol in order to keep the masses under control came up with ‘The Hunger Games’. Each year a boy and a girl (ages 12-18) are chosen from each district and the 24 players are pitted against each other in a televised national event until only one is left alive and can be crowned victor.

 

The main character is 16 year old Katniss Everdeen(Jennifer Lawrence), who comes from the coal producing District 12. Despite her young age Katniss is the head of her household and her whole purpose in life is the survival of her family. Her main concern is her little sister Primrose (Willow Shields), who has reached the age to be entered into the drawing for the games. Gale (Liam Hemsworth) her best friend and hunting partner is the one person she can talk to about her life, as well as plot imaginary escapes and ways to get back at the Capitol for making them chess pieces in their cruel games.

 

On the day of the reaping (when kids get chosen for the games) Primrose is chosen and Katniss volunteers to take her place. Along with Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson) the boy chosen from her district, they are dragged through all of the traditional events, led by their drunken mentor Haymitch (Woody Harrelson) a past victor of the games. All of the events are held in the extravagant Capitol, which is the only place that sees the games as entertainment while the rest of Panem suffers watching their children getting killed. After running through each event we eventually get to the games, the culminating point of the movie where each one is out for their own survival.

 

People might think Lawrence’s performance is dry, but I think she impersonated Katniss exactly how she is described in the book, a girl whose main priority whether it be at home in District 12 or in the games is survival. All other human emotions such as romantic love are far beyond her priorities. So, just a reminder to everyone, this is not a love story but a story of survival. The makeup work, which might have been mixed in with some computer graphics, was very well done, especially the parts concerning Hutcherson’s camouflaging. The thing this movie did the best though was making sure the audience understood what was going on, whether it be from actual written words at the beginning of the movie, one character signaling or mouthing to another, flashbacks, the announcer of the games Ceasar Flickerman (Stanley Tucci) explaining step by step concepts, visuals such as a screen that shows the woods to let us know Katniss misses home or to let us see the layout of the arena where the games take place. I think that element alone will make the movie successful to those that haven’t read the books. I also have to give credit to the fact that the violence in the book wasn’t cut out much in the film, it is this rawness and cruelty that really drives the book so although it is shocking to see it on the big screen it was appreciated; I think either we have really trained kids to be ok with violence or that this film should be rated R.

 

Unfortunately, because of the detail and length of the books certain things were missed and a large part of it that felt rushed were human connections. Obviously in the book we see this relationships develop slowly, in the movie we are not quite sure how certain characters get so close or come to care for one another and I think that’s an element that would have been worth spending time on. Another major theme that was missed was ‘hunger’, the audience has no real sense of how poor and starved the people that don’t live in the Capitol are; hence the reason for Katiniss’ drive and ability to survive.

 

Surprisingly despite the depressing subject of the movie there was some comedy worked into it, which perhaps a little more couldn’t have hurt. Also, it was nice being able to see some other characters point of views since the books are told mainly just from Katniss’ experiences. The audience I watched the movie with were half fans of the books and half people that haven’t read the books, the movie certainly captivated all because there was cheering, clapping, “awwing”, gasping and crying at various points of the movie; this was a crowd that let their emotions show. Without a doubt this is the most anticipated movie of 2012 and for the most part it fulfilled my expectations, I wouldn’t say it went beyond them but this is a note from a satisfied fan of the books to a now fan of the movie.      

Karen Posada

By

2012/03/14 at 12:00am

Seeking Justice

03.14.2012 | By |

Seeking Justice

Seeking Justice’ is a mix of action and suspense, which although it entertains it seems to need some extra editing. The actions scenes need to be polished because at times it seems as if we were watching a practice scene not the real thing, I kept on waiting for one of the actors to turn around and look at the camera laughing. The story is interesting and convincing up to a certain point, it is missing some flavor so that it is more exciting though.

 

Will Gerard (Nicolas Cage) finds himself in a bind when someone attacks his wife, Laura (January Jones). Just at the moment when Will is most desperate, a man named Simon (Guy Pearce) tells him he’s part of a vigilante group which is made up of everyday citizens and they help one another, he offers to help him and his wife find some peace. In his moment of need Will accepts and just when everything seems to start becoming normal in their lives again Simon appears, to remind Will that he needs to repay the favor.

 

I think Cage tries too hard to play the role of a normal person, even in his way of speaking his character has no sense of urgency, his voice and even his actions although they are justifiably nervous they are monotonous. Pearce plays his character well; he’s just the right amount of harsh and controlling with a hint of bad guy without being exaggerated. Some parts of the dialogue have humor in them, which surprised me. Also, there are some unexpected twists, which definitely don’t let you, loose interest in the film. 

 

I see this movie as to what would happen to a normal person if the found themselves in this situation, not how a Hollywood movie would play it out. Obviously there are some intricate scenes, but in the hand combat scenes there’s not the normal sophistication movies have. I like the concept of the story because it’s interesting, I also like the way it develops; but I think a little more glamour would be appropriate in order for it to have a spot at the box office.

Karen Posada

By

2012/03/09 at 12:00am

John Carter

03.9.2012 | By |

John Carter

When I first saw previews for ‘John Carter’, I thought it was going to be a confusing mess with mediocre CGI, but boy was I wrong. There is definitely a lot going on in the film and if you get up to use the restroom it might be hard to catch up, otherwise the story unfolds slowly enough for you to not get lost. It is advertised, as it being the predecessor of ‘Starwars’ and ‘Avatar’ and it isn’t a false statement, seeing how this character has been around in comic books for 100 years. This mix of human, aliens, and other weird beings set in the planet Mars gives us an adventure that is sure to become a franchise and it will gain many followers.  

 

The movie beings by giving us a background of the planet Mars and the situation there, then it jumps to New York where John Carter’s nephew comes to his rich uncle’s house and learns about the biggest adventure of his uncle’s life. John Carter (Taylor Kitsch) served as captain in the civil war, we are given very little background information on him, he seems to have shut himself out from the world, to not have many friends, doesn’t want to take part on anyone’s war and only wants to get rich.

 

By chance he is transported to Mars, where he meets aliens and human like beings and he goes back and forth between being a hero and a traitor to all. His main motivation unexpectedly comes from a princess, Dejah Thoris (Lynn Collins) who inspires him to fight for a cause against: Sab Than (Dominic West) and a stronger force they barely know exists, the Threns,Matai Shang (Mark Strong) in particular. With the help of the Thark, especially Sola (Samantha Morton) and Tars Tarkas (Williem Dafoe), John Carter gets involved in a story he could have never imagined.

 

There’s no great acting in this film, in fact the dialogue besides the different dialects and weird names of things is very plain and just enough to carry us from scene to scene. What makes the movie is the action and the images, most scenes are full of action and even when there’s not much happening the background and the surroundings are enough to keep you entertained. The 3D certainly enhances the film but I think it would fare probably just as well in a regular screen.

 

My favorite things: The Thark, Woola-Carter’s pet in Mars so adorably ugly, the strength in both sexes throughout the movie, although they do play the damsel in distress angle at times. Lastly, technology mixed in with archaic backgrounds of temples and desert. The love story was one of the things I disliked, simply because it was too predictable, at times it even felt pushed and it wasn’t convincing. Carter is almost cave man like, his strength overpowers logic; he acts before thinking in almost every scene and I don’t know if I can consider that ‘hero’ like qualities.

 

I dare to say that this is as of now one of the best movies 2012 has offered because of all the elements it combines. It has the ability to combine such different scenarios, eras, times, zones, beings, etc.; into one movie without being overly complicated and that is what a good entertaining action film is about. It does start to feel a little long towards the end, but it is able to end the chapter in a very decent and clean way without being overly dramatic. Most importantly it leaves us wondering what will come next.    

Karen Posada

By

2012/03/03 at 12:00am

Project X

03.3.2012 | By |

Project X

Think of the wildest party you’ve ever been to and imagine it 10x wilder, that’s ‘Project X’. If you’ve seen the trailer and expect anything more from the movie then you will be disappointed but if you are up for having mindless fun then this is it. Most of the dialogue in the movie comes in the form of vulgar jokes about sex, which is fair seeing we are dealing with horny teens. What keeps you entertained is the shocking funny moments that top each other and the music blasting from the screen.

 

The whole movie is done in “found footage” style and focuses on throwing a 17th birthday party for Thomas (Thomas Mann) that he will never forget while his parents are out of town. Thomas is the mature mind of the group but he’s not strong enough to stick to what he thinks is right, especially with the influence of his friends and hot girls. His best friend, Costa (Oliver Cooper) is the mastermind behind it all. His whole party plan is inviting as many girls as he can to ensure the boys will have sex and will also become popular. JB (Jonathan Daniel Brown) is the passive friend that shyly follows along and slowly comes out of his shell. Their cameraman, Dax (Dax Flame) is this creepy guy they invite along their journey and becomes their silent partner. Thanks to these four teens Pasadena, California will have a night it will never forget.

 

There’s not much to say about the acting, it’s not hard to put a bunch of people together to act like they are having fun in the craziest party of their life. Instead the ideas of director, Nima Nourizadeh are what makes the movie, his simple premise – a teen party that spirals out of control was enough to bring upon this insane movie. The “found footage” technique with the handheld cameras was a brilliant idea, although dizzying at times it brings the audience inside the party.

 

I have to admit some of the language and scenes are disturbing and offensive at times, but with the fast pace of the film you will be disgusted one second then laughing the next. This film is a semi-tamed version of ‘The Hangover’, no wonder since producer Todd Phillips is involved. I would warn parents that this is a bad influence on kids seeing how carelessly these teens drink, have sex and use drugs; it will probably make parents paranoid. But perhaps instead we can all just live vicariously through this movie for a short night. One thing is for sure; this movie makes a police riot and being chased by a drug dealer look like a lot of fun. It certainly put me in the mood to go running to the next house party I’m invited to.

Karen Posada

By

2012/03/03 at 12:00am

Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax

03.3.2012 | By |

Dr. Seuss' The Lorax

I watched ‘Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax’ in a movie theater full of kids ranging from 3-10 years of age, which gave me the perfect audience with a mix of adults to get the right movie experience for this film. This movie exudes cuteness and the right amount of singing, the bits of comedy it has just made me smile and a couple of children laugh. There was no crying or chattering in the audience, which tells me the film’s 94 minutes are the perfect amount of entertainment for its target audience. The brilliant colors and clever shapes and storyline were even more fantastic in IMAX 3D, although ‘Horton Hears a Who’ achieved the same visual greatness without IMAX 3D.

 

The film begins by explaining in singing our setting, Thneedville, which is a city, made of plastic entirely, there’s no nature; trees are made in a factory and the most powerful man in town and the villain, Mr. O’Hare (Rob Riggle) made his millions by selling air. A 12 year old boy, Ted (Zac Efron) who is in love with a high schooler, Audrey (Taylor Swift) who dreams of seeing a real tree; decides to go on a quest to win the girl’s affection by getting her what she wants. He travels outside of the “capsule” that is his city to the contaminated world beyond in search of The Once-ler (Ed Helms) who according to his grandma Norma (Betty White) is the only person that can lead him to the free oxygen producing trees.

 

Here is when we being to discover the story of The Lorax (Danny DeVito) who speaks for the trees and cares for nature. What Ted finds in his journey not only changes his life but that of the whole town and the main message of the movie comes across, that each and single one of us makes a difference and we all need to care for our planet.

 

DeVito’s voice is perfect with that of the furry chubby Lorax, he’s a like a wise joke cracking grandpa that teaches just in the right tone. Efron is laid back and curious just the right amount to depict a 12 year old. White is the best character, the crazy grandma that is always covering for her grandchildren. Every voice created the characters depicted on the screen and together created a very pleasant movie to watch.

 

The environmentalist message of the film and the dangers of industrialism are very clear; that it takes one person to care so that we can come together as a whole to save the planet and the beauty it offers. I personally didn’t care for the “love story” in the film, but it was easy to over look it, with all the other more important stuff happening, even if it was what pushed the storyline. A children’s movie that has such an inspiring and important message with enough entertainment and color is a nice treat to both parents and children to see.

Select a Page