Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Movie Reviews

Jack Rico

By

2009/06/09 at 12:00am

Gran Torino

06.9.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.5

Rated: R for language throughout, and some violence.
Release Date: 2008-12-12
Starring: Nick Schenk
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: NULL

 Go to our film page

Gran Torino is an amazingly over-the-top anti-racism parable but, despite its obvious shortcomings, it is nevertheless effective and affecting. The storytelling style is old fashioned in what it does and unsubtle in the way it goes about doing it, and Eastwood doesn’t plumb any new depths in his stereotyped portrayal of the film’s central character. Yet, perhaps because the ending doesn’t unspool quite as expected and perhaps because the film has something to say (even if it is presented with a heavy hand), it’s hard to deny that Gran Torino works on a certain level. This is far from Eastwood’s best work as a director, but it’s a respectable effort and is more successful that his tepid earlier 2008 effort, Changeling.

 

Walt Kowalski (Clint Eastwood) is an unpleasant old coot. Following the death of his wife, he has lived alone with his dog. He is barely on speaking terms with his sons and grandchildren, and the neighborhood in which he lives is changing, becoming more ethnically diverse and troubled by gangs. He has a less-than-cordial relationship with the Asian family next door, and it becomes even colder when the son, Thao (Bee Vang), attempts to steal Walt’s 1972 Gran Torino as part of a gang initiation. He fails when Walt shows up with a rifle. Later, when the gang members arrive to give Thao a “second chance” and a fight breaks out, Walt and his rifle are again on hand and he drives the gang-bangers off. This results in Walt playing the role of reluctant hero. He is soon visited regularly by Thao’s smart and spirited older sister, Sue (Ahney Her). And Thao, as a penance for his attempted theft, is forced to work for Walt. This leads to some bonding and a growing realization on Walt’s part that, as long as the gang is around, Theo’s future is not secure.

 

Gran Torino uses the familiar cross-generational buddy formula as its foundation. As Walt imparts important life lessons to Thao (including how to interact with others in a “manly” fashion), Thao opens the heart of the bigoted misanthrope. Ultimately, this becomes a story about overcoming prejudice. In this, the film lathers things on a little too thickly. The transformation occurs too easily and with too little motivation. Yes, Walt gains his redemption – which is the point of the movie – but it’s questionable how effective the screenplay is in selling that redemption. Maybe we buy into it because of Eastwood or because we always like to see Scrooge wake up on Christmas morning and save Tiny Tim.

 

Speaking of Eastwood, his name has been mentioned alongside the phrase “Best Actor nomination” in a number of places, but to award the venerable filmmaker/actor with such a tribute in this case would be an injustice. Eastwood is playing a variation of Dirty Harry – a hard-bitten loner who at times is so over-the-top nasty that he borders on self-parody, such as when he literally growls when someone does something of which he disapproves. While it’s true that the character arc forces Walt to exhibit a new open-mindedness, there’s nothing exceptionally complex in Eastwood’s approach to the material. He played a similar role to better effect in Million Dollar Baby.

 

While Eastwood may not deserve acting plaudits, a case can be made for his two Asian co-stars. As Thao, Bee Vang shows more growth and development of personality than Walt. He and Eastwood evidence the right amount of chemistry – certainly enough to allow us to believe that they care for each other against all odds. Ahney Her is a real find – bright and energetic, she brings pizzazz to the role and shines brightest during a scene when Sue is giving Walt a walk-through of her house and parrying his racist remarks with well-aimed quips. Walt and Thao may be Gran Torino‘s lead characters, but Sue is the one we’re most likely to remember long after the end credits have expired.

 

The film gets points for its unconventional resolution, which I will not disclose here. Suffice it to say that this is a rare movie that doesn’t implode during the last reel; the filmmaking team obviously put some thought into the best way to construct the conclusion. There are some emotional moments and tears are not necessarily inappropriate although, as previously mentioned, it’s questionable whether the movie earns all of the tissues that will be used on its behalf. As parables go, this one is almost shockingly obvious but, in thinking about it, it’s not that far away from Million Dollar Baby, with both films featuring key interactions between Eastwood’s character and a priest. And, while Eastwood may not turn in a great performance, he’s a strong reliable presence whose participation somehow makes it okay to shed those tears. Despite its flaws, I appreciate Gran Torino, although I do so more with my heart than with my head.

Jack Rico

By

2009/06/09 at 12:00am

The International

06.9.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.5

Rated: R for some sequences of violence and language.
Release Date: 2009-02-13
Starring: Eric Singer
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA, Germany
Official Website: http://www.everybodypays.com/

 Go to our film page

The International is a complicated film with an intricate plot line and lackluster acting. It’s only redeeming qualities are its action sequences and fast paced direction.

The premise is hard to follow: Interpol Agent Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) and Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) are determined to bring to justice one of the world’s most powerful banks. Uncovering myriad and reprehensible illegal activities, Salinger and Whitman follow the money from Berlin to Milan to New York to Istanbul. Finding themselves in a high-stakes chase across the globe, their relentless tenacity puts their own lives at risk as their targets will stop at nothing – even murder – to continue financing terror and war.

Naomi Watts gave the worst performance in her career. It’s as if she has become worse over the years beginning with King Kong. Clive Owen is no Jason Bourne, but is believable enough that the credibility of the film isn’t compromised.

Be ready for what will be the most talked about action sequence of the early new year – the Guggenheim museum shooting frenzy is well worth the watch.

For a production that aspires to be so much more than a typical thriller, The International’s convoluted premise and Naomi’s painful acting achieves only to convey an average movie experience.

Jack Rico

By

2009/06/09 at 12:00am

Crossing Over

06.9.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.5

Rated: R for pervasive language, some strong violence and sexuality/nudity.
Release Date: 2009-02-27
Starring: Wayne Kramer
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: Not available.

 Go to our film page

“Crossing Over” had the potential to be one of the better films of the new year. It possesses some strong acting by a talented cast led by Harrison Ford and a socially relevant story line, but unfortunately it was all squandered away in the hands of helmer Wayne Kramer (The Cooler). Ultimately, the film feels like a counterfeit version of ‘Crash’ and ‘Babel’ from mexican director Alejandro González Iñárritu. There are some commendable and engaging moments, but not enough to ignore the defects of its second hour.

Here’s the plot – ‘Crossing Over’ is a multi-character canvas about immigrants of different nationalities struggling to achieve legal status in Los Angeles. The film, seen from the perspective of the INS, deals with the border, document fraud, the asylum and green card process, work-site enforcement, naturalization, the office of counter terrorism and the clash of cultures. There are several stories that eventually intertwine at the very end.

A noteworthy mention should be given to Kramer’s implementation of immigrants as not just poor, working class Mexicans, but as a distinct representation of classes and nationalities. Also, perhaps the best acting scenes of the film came from Summer Bishil, who is part Mexican, playing Taslima Jahangir, an Iranian teenager who approves of the motives behind the 9/11 attacks. Just in case you’re looking to see Brazilian Alice Braga, she is scarcely seen. It was all working out nicely as a dramatic and enticing piece of film until it suddenly became an action thriller, giving way to Ford summoning President James Marshall from ‘Air Force One’. Where did that come from?

In an effort to not reveal too much, I’m limiting myself to saying this – Kramer would like us to believe that the lives of these characters are crisscrossed and interwoven by accident or fate, but halfway thru the end, you can sense the manipulative machinations and moralistic intent of the calculated plot. There goes Hollywood again trying to insult our intelligence.

A remake of this film in the hands of director Alejandro González Iñárritu would be interesting to see, but I highly doubt that idea is an option. At best, ‘Crossing Over’ is halfway engaging, but not worth the ticket or the time. Wait for it on Netflix.

Jack Rico

By

2009/06/04 at 12:00am

The Hangover

06.4.2009 | By |

Rated: R for pervasive language, sexual content including nudity, and some drug material.
Release Date: 2009-06-05
Starring: Jon Lucas, Scott Moore
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://hangovermovie.warnerbros.com/

Go to our film page

The Hangover

‘The Hangover’ is the type of comedy I like. Slightly in your face, but never pushing the envelope past the point of no return (i.e; Observe and Report). It’s this year’s Pineapple Express. But the best thing about this film is the plotline. Absolutely fantastic! It’s really hard to find stories interesting enough to perk up your senses in today’s Hollywood.

Two days before his wedding, Doug (Justin Bartha) and his three friends (Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms and Zach Galifianakis) drive to Las Vegas for a blow-out bachelor party they’ll never forget. But, in fact, when the three groomsmen wake up the next morning, they can’t remember a thing, nor where the soon to be husband Doug is. With no clue as to what transpired and little time to spare, the trio must retrace their hazy steps, figure out what happened to Doug and get back to the weeding in time before anyone suspects what happened.

There are moments when the story drags a bit in the middle, but all worth disregarding due to the compelling and amusing story. So how was the acting? Terrific. Zach Galifianakis, the bearded fellow, was such an annoying puss that he really managed to get under my skin. Cooper was just a rock star and after this film, he’ll no doubt be leading man material in his next project.

This is perhaps the most entertaining film of the year. I enjoyed it and so will you!

Jack Rico

By

2009/06/04 at 12:00am

Land of the Lost

06.4.2009 | By |

Rated: PG-13 for crude and sexual content, and for language including a drug reference.
Release Date: 2009-06-05
Starring: Chris Henchy & Dennis McNicholas
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://www.landofthelost.net/

Go to our film page

Land of the Lost

‘Land of the Lost’ only has two funny scenes worth enjoying. The rest is ancillary and periphery entertainment that distracts you long enough from zonking out. I must admit though, Will Ferrell and Danny McBride are funny guys and they can make boring look funny, as was the case here. Without them, this film could have been much worse. Simply put, the story just wasn’t very interesting. In order to compensate for the deficiencies in the script, special effects teams had to work over-time to force audiences to re-route their attention to it.

Based on the television series with the same name, Dr. Rick Marshall (Ferrell) is sucked into a space-time vortex alongside his research assistant (Anna Friel) and a redneck survivalist (McBride). In this alternate universe, the trio make friends with a primate named Chaka (Taccone), their only ally in a world full of dinosaurs and other fantastic creatures. Can they all make it back to our world alive, and if so: will Dr. Marshall go from zero to hero with his discoveries? These are the questions that are not worth sticking around for.

But I’m not going to go into bashing this film frame to frame. The bottom line is that Ferrell and McBride are great at what they do and they really are funny. They’re worth every penny, but not here. The reason is the story, an incongruous story and plotline at that.

The CGI was inconsistent, sometimes it was on, other times it didn’t fulfill expectations. Overall, this movie doesn’t fulfill my expectations nor will it yours.

Alex Florez

By

2009/06/02 at 12:00am

He’s Just Not That Into You

06.2.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: PG-13 for sexual content and brief strong language.
Release Date: 2009-02-06
Starring: Abby Kohn, Marc Silverstein
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: www.hesjustnotthatintoyoumovie.com

 Go to our film page

With an ensemble cast put together with the who’s who of the romantic comedy genre, and with the ‘Sex and the City’ scribes behind it, He’s Just Not That Into You positions itself as this year’s go to Valentine’s Day picture.  And while the film is predictably predictable, I must say that to its credit, it manages to keep the mawkish sentimentality to a minimum. 

Based on the book written by Greg Behrendt and Liz Tuccillo, the film takes us into the lives of a group of interconnected, Baltimore-based twenty- and thirty-somethings as they navigate their various relationships from the shallow end of the dating pool through the deep, murky waters of married life, trying to read the signs of the opposite sex and hoping to eventually live out their fairy tale love stories. 

But much like Sex and the City, the film blatantly romanticizes the lives of white young urban professionals.  Lives that at this point are cliched and generic.  It seems as though everyone in the film is well off financially and living in a fabulous duplex built in the latest neighborhood to fall victim to the ‘gentrifying powers that be’.  Sadly, whenever the film does allude to the rest the people in this world, it does so by staging Latinos and Africans in offensively stereotypical situations.

The only air of authenticity the filmmakers manage to inject into the story comes from their decision to base the story in Baltimore, a city which certainly makes its case for future productions to consider its ‘Domino Sugar’ backdrop.

The actors, nevertheless, are likable (not to mention also incredibly good looking) and absolute pros at delivering one-liners which you shouldn’t ordinarily find funny.  The great thing about movies with parallel stories, such as this one, is that you’re less likely to leave the theater disappointed because you’re given a choice from several characters and situations to ‘fall in love with’.  A formula that also worked well with ‘Sex’.  Now, if we can only add a little color…

Mack Chico

By

2009/06/02 at 12:00am

Defiance

06.2.2009 | By |

Rating: 0.0

Rated: R for violence and language.
Release Date: 2009-01-16
Starring: Clayton Frohman, Edward Zwick
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.defiancemovie.com/

 Go to our film page

For some reason, the Nazis are popular during the holiday season of 2008. They occupy central positions in Valkyrie and Good, flitter around the periphery of The Reader, and are rarely seen but very much present in Defiance. Edward Zwick’s adaptation of the true-to-life story of Nechama Tec’s book about the Bielski partisans, this movie is less about the struggle against the Nazis than it is about the fight for survival. Although there are battles, Defiance spends most of its time exploring the difficulties of surviving as fugitives in the midst of a Soviet winter.

The year is 1941 and the place is Belarus. Hitler is on the move pushing eastward and the Final Solution is underway. The four surviving Beilski brothers – Tuvia (Daniel Craig), Zus (Liev Schreiber), Asael (Jamie Bell), and Aron (George MacKay) – are forced to hide in the woods after the local police, in collaboration with the Germans, kill the rest of the family. But the Beilskis’ time on the run is not destined to be spent alone. Like moths to the flame, other Jewish refugees are drawn to them, until they are more like a dispossessed community than a ragtag group. The bigger the camp gets, the more problems arise. Tuvia and Zus openly clash, with the former advocating a largely peaceful philosophy and the latter wanting to get bloody. Disease, starvation, and cold threaten health and lives as the autumn deepens into winter. And the Germans are on the hunt, offering a reward and seeking the location where Tuvia and the Bielski partisans are holed up.

The principal flaw of Defiance is that some of the high-minded sentiments voiced by Tuvia in flowery speeches seem too noble and unrealistic for the circumstances. Also, while there’s nothing specifically wrong with Daniel Craig’s performance, it can be a little difficult accepting the actor as a Jew. One suspects Craig’s participation in the film might have been a concession to its getting the financing needed. After all, the rest of the cast is not populated by household names. Although Craig has the lion’s share of the screen time as well as the plum role, Liev Schreiber provides the most memorable performance – a forceful turn as the conflicted, least idealistic of the Beilski brothers.

The battle scenes are well choreographed and contain enough uncertainty to make them genuinely exciting, but one would expect no less from a man who has overseen Civil War engagements (Glory) and Japanese strife (The Last Samurai). More compelling, however, is the drama associated with the establishment and maintenance of the Bielski partisans’ refugee camp, situated deep in a forest during one of the most inhospitable times of the year. Not only are there problems with famine brought on by the inability to grow anything in the freezing cold, but an epidemic of typhus runs rampant through the community. Zwick re-creates each new crisis with immediacy and doesn’t bypass other less life-and-death elements of life: faith in God under such trying circumstances; love, sex, and marriage (three of the four brothers become emotionally connected to female refugees); and the friction that occurs between the Bielski group and other partisans in the area. The TV ads for Defiance make it seem like the movie centers on a series of guerilla attacks on the Nazis but, in reality, those moments are a small part of the wider tapestry Zwick has stitched together out of a combination of true history and dramatic license.

Defiance makes explicit the parallelism between a group of Jews fleeing from Nazi death squads and the Exodus. One rabbi prays that God will release the Jews from the curse of being the chosen people so they can stop running and being persecuted. However, the film runs the risk of overplaying its hand when one character remarks on the lack of supernatural intervention in parting the waters during a journey through swamplands.

Central to the film’s effectiveness is the transformation of Tuvia from idealist to pragmatist. While he never reaches the level of callousness and brutality displayed by Zus, events force him to reconsider the price of showing mercy. Craig handles the performance well enough for us to believe this character development, but this isn’t his best work (for my money, that can be found in either Layer Cake or Casino Royale). Ultimately, the film works not just because of the character arc it provides for its main character but for its ultimate theme of the triumph over adversity. In Exodus, Moses led the Hebrews out of captivity. Who would have suspected that in this tale, the role of Moses would be played by James Bond?

Alex Florez

By

2009/06/02 at 12:00am

Revolutionary Road

06.2.2009 | By |

Rating: 4.0

Rated: R for language and some sexual content/nudity.
Release Date: 2008-12-26
Starring: Justin Haythe, Richard Yates
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:EE.UU, Reino Unido
Official Website: http://www.revolutionaryroadmovie.com/

 Go to our film page

Revolutionary Road is the dissection of an imploding marriage and a contemplation about life in surburbia. It’s a sad, grim movie that asks pointed questions about the compromises we make and the lies we tell in an effort to maintain a sense of equilibrium. And is it more courageous to face up to one’s responsibilities or to follow a dream, no matter how impossible it may seem?

It’s western Connecticut in 1955. Frank Wheeler (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his wife, April (Kate Winslet), are entering a dark period in their marriage. Communication between them has broken down and Frank has begun to stray with a co-worker (Zoe Kazan). He’s not happy with his job; he hates the work but needs the money to support April and his two children. Then, on his birthday, April presents Frank with a plan: sell their cozy house on Revolutionary Road and move to Paris. There, after leaving behind the “hopeless emptiness” of their current life, they can begin anew. April can work while Frank takes some time for self-discovery. He is initially enthused by the idea, but reality begins to intrude on the fantasy. Frank is offered a major promotion, and with it comes more money and more responsibility, and April learns that she is pregnant with the couple’s third child. Suddenly, Paris seems like a fairy tale and the union that had been buoyed by a spark of elusive hope, crashes and burns.

 

A lot of marriages are like this, with many of the fundamental problems not having changed in 50 years. Too many unions begun with hope and optimism degenerate into stale existences with two disconnected individuals living under the same roof. Today, many such couples divorce. In 1955, divorce was less common, so husbands and wives would argue and find ways to make temporary peace. It’s unfair to claim that the happy suburban family was (or is) an illusion, but the reality is not as perfect as the illusion. There are challenges to be overcome, one of the most prominent of which is the battle between following a dream and bringing home a healthy income. In the Wheelers’ marriage, Frank is the pragmatist and April is the dreamer. Their most searing conflicts are born out of the inherent opposition of those two natures.

Watching DiCaprio and Winslet, it’s hard to remember that these were the star-crossed lovers in Titanic. Their on-screen relationship here is more real and brittle – not the kind of marriage some viewers would hope for from Rose and Jack. The actors use their chemistry (they are great friends) to forge an underlying sense of affection between Frank and April, but the fractures are deep and widening. These are believable, flawed people and, as in situations like this, fault can be generously apportioned. It’s possible to understand both sides. Assigning blame is as difficult as determining the solution. Winslet’s performance is more emotive than DiCaprio’s, but that’s because of the nature of her character. Both portrayals are credible and, while Winslet’s performance in The Reader is probably more likely to gain Oscar consideration than her work as April, it seems unfair to single out one over the other.

Revolutionary Road is dramatically potent material and, although it poses a number of philosophical questions, it works best as an unsentimental examination of a marriage in crisis. Because the actors are expert, Mendes understands the subject matter, and the source material is so meticulous, we are left emotionally impacted but without a sense of having been manipulated. Revolutionary Road is a fine motion picture, but it’s not a good choice to lighten a burden or brighten a night. It rewards in the ways that only tragedies can.

Alex Florez

By

2009/05/28 at 12:00am

Up

05.28.2009 | By |

Rated: PG for some peril and action.
Release Date: 2009-05-29
Starring: Bob Peterson
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/up/

Go to our film page

Up

With its 10th film, Disney-Pixar adds to what is an already impressive collection of animated features that have delighted kids and adults alike since the mid 90s.  In the tradition of its predecessors, UP not only stretches the imagination, but through the familiar qualities we see in their characters, also manages to galvanize our hearts into action. Quietly, and simply put, Pixar has become the brand we can trust to inspire.

UP, follows the touching story of a 78 year old balloon salesman Carl Fredricksen (Ed Asner), who finally fulfills his lifelong dream of a great adventure when he ties thousands of balloons to his house and flies away to the jungles of South America. But he soon discovers that he won’t be alone on his journey – an 8 year old ‘wilderness explorer’ named Russell is inadvertently on board.

Despite its impeccable record of hit films, Pixar doesn’t simply follow a formula that has worked for them in the past.  They continuously explore new territory and with last year’s Wall-E even go as far as making daring social political commentary.  Of course it’s all hidden underneath a score of lovable characters and a hilarious string of jokes. 

 

UP however, seems to push the envelope even further by introducing some sobering moments we’re not used to seeing in ‘kid movies’.  Trust me, you’ll know what I’m talking about when you see them.  While navigating between these type of scenes and the lighthearted ones is something director Pete Docter (Monsters, Inc.) does swiftly, it also presents the film’s most challenging and uncomfortable moments. Notwithstanding, you’ll be in for an hour an a half of absolute fun.

It is hard to say where UP ranks among the other Pixar classics, but as of now it is one genre-bending unpredictable animated family action comedy for all age groups.

 

Jack Rico

By

2009/05/27 at 12:00am

Drag Me to Hell

05.27.2009 | By |

Rated: PG-13 for sequences of horror violence, terror, disturbing images and language.
Release Date: 2009-05-29
Starring: Ivan Raimi, Sam Raimi
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://www.dragmetohell.net/

Go to our film page

Drag Me to Hell

Sam Raimi’s ‘Drag Me to Hell’ is a deliberately funny, horror film, which is neither too funny nor too scary. It’s definitely not a classic, but a refreshing return to a format that has seen many successes in the decade of the 80’s. This film is not meant to be taken seriously at all; you’re supposed to laugh at the funny parts, and as a nice surprise, you’ll occasionally be on the edge of your seat with suspense. What you should expect is to be grossed out by a myriad of scenes. Raimi is obviously looking to make you feel uncomfortable.

The plot is simple and straightforward – a loan officer is cursed by a gypsy for not helping her keep her home and now she needs to try and stop evil spirits from dragging her to hell.

I must admit, I was caught off guard with the intentional hilarity of the film. I’m so conditioned to laugh at today’s horror films because of how bad they are that this one almost tricked me. Cinematically, this movie is not good. The acting is bad, the dialogue is comical and the pacing is off. Fortunately for me, I understood what the Raimi was trying to do here and it made me enjoy the rest of the film. Sam Raimi, known for his three Spider-Man films, is no neophyte to the horror/comedy genre, actually he’s known in many circles as the guy who created it with his series of 80’s cult movies – Evil Dead.

It’s funny to me though, how much the Spanish language and Hispanics (Mexican’s really) have integrated themselves within Hollywood storylines. The opening 5-8 minutes of the movie are spoken completely in Spanish with a Mexican couple trying to save their son from the clutches of the devil. The Oscar nominated Mexican actress Adriana Barraza (Babel) plays an enchantress who wants revenge on the devil. She goes on this Spanish spell monologue without subtitles which makes it difficult for non Spanish speakers to understand, but advantageous for us bilinguals to appreciate.

Overall, ‘Drag Me to Hell’ serves as a senseless night out with friends looking to laugh and be grossed out. I particularly wouldn’t pay New York City prices for it ($12.50 a ticket), but a good $5-7 ticket buy wouldn’t be out of the question for a fun time at the flicks.

Select a Page