Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Reviews for DVD Releases

Mack Chico

By

2009/09/15 at 12:00am

Next Day Air

09.15.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: R for pervasive language, drug content, some violence and brief sexuality.
Release Date: 2009-05-08
Starring: Blair Cobbs
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.nextdayair-themovie.com/

 Go to our film page

Far from the worst of Tarantino knockoffs, “Next Day Air” takes the standard formula of dimwits chasing bags of drugs to the ‘hood.

 

A stoned deliveryman (Donald Faison) mistakenly delivers a huge box of cocaine to the wrong address, where lowlifes Guch (Wood Harris) and Brody (Mike Epps) try to figure out what to do with it. On the couch sleeps a huge guy neither of them invited to live with them, but both of them are too afraid to ask him to leave.

 

The package was supposed to be delivered to another small-timer, Jesus (Cisco Reyes), who, in between fights with his sassy girlfriend (Yasmin Deliz), is about to get killed by a drug lord if he can’t find the stash.

 

Routine stuff, but things move quickly, with several offhand funny moments. Mos Def is hilarious in a cameo as another delivery guy.

Jack Rico

By

2009/09/15 at 12:00am

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

09.15.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: PG-13
Release Date: 2009-05-01
Starring: David Benioff
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.xmenorigins.com/

 Go to our film page

 

Is the bootleg online version of ‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ better than the cinematic experience? If you already saw the illegal downloaded version, should you spend your money to watch it in a real movie theater? I personally haven’t seen the unauthorized edition, but from the feedback I’ve received from those who have and with my take from the theatrical version – yes, you should see it in theaters only if you enjoyed what you saw. It would enhance the experience that director Gavin Hood intended to originally put forth, but, if you didn’t like the story to begin with, odds are you won’t like it after you see in the big screen.

‘X-Men Origins: Wolverine’ is set prior to the events of the original X-Men films, sometime in the 1970s. It begins principally with Wolverine and partially with a few other legends of the X-Men universe. Some highlights include characters and story lines that have been long anticipated. The movie also explores Logan’s romance with Kayla Silverfox. Kayla’s fate triggers Logan’s involvement with the ominous Weapon X program, a top secret, billion-dollar military experiment, in which Wolverine obtains his indestructible metal skeleton.

The film had several problems ranging from blatant gaps in the story, underwhelming performances by new characters, to the unacceptable, second-rate CGI effects throughout the film (in particular a cameo done by a CGI Patrick Stewart). Unfortunately, these critical factors in particular, were too distracting for me to overcome. In its defense, there were many laudable moments such as Hugh Jackman’s performance of Wolverine (I can’t see anyone else ever playing him) and Liev Schrieber as his archenemy brethren, Sabretooth. Ryan Reynolds, who has been bashed by some bloggers for being casted as Deadpool, was likable in playing the wise cracking sword killer.

Overall, you have the good and the bad making ‘Wolverine’ an average film. Brett Ratner’s “X-Men: The Last Stand” turned out to be a better films on all levels. On a separate note, watch out for two clips after the credits, one scene immediately after the credits begin and the other at the very end of all the credits. These will reveal some of what may come in the next sequel.

Jack Rico

By

2009/09/01 at 12:00am

Earth

09.1.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: G
Release Date: 2009-04-22
Starring: Alastair Fothergill, Mark Linfield, Leslie Megahey
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA, Germany, UK
Official Website: http://www.loveearth.es/

 Go to our film page

‘Earth’ is the first film from Walt Disney’s new movie studio “Disneynature”. It is very similar to the documentaries that Discovery or National Geographic create except that Disney was the first to create this genre of film 60 years ago. If you have seen ‘March of the Penguins’ and ‘Arctic Tale’ along with the bevy of nature documentaries from PBS amongst many other television networks, you are not missing anything new or innovative.

“EARTH,” narrated by James Earl Jones, tells the story of three animal families and their journeys across Earth. We watch as a polar bear mother struggles to feed her newborn cubs as the sun melts the ice beneath their feet. The determination of an elephant mother as she guides her tiny calf on an endless trek across the Kalahari Desert in search of fresh water. We follow a humpbacked whale mother and her calf as they undertake the longest migration of any marine mammal—4,000 miles from the tropics to the Antarctic in search of food.

The film is released today, Earth Day, April 22, a logical marketing tactic, along with the “Buy a ticket, Plant a tree” initiative which has Disney planting a tree for everyone who sees EARTH between April 22-28. As of now, 500,000 trees will be planted.

My father loves these grandiose, awe-inspiring nature documentaries, but he would never pay money to see it in a movie theater when he can view a show similar to this on TV, in the privacy of his own home. You see, the only downside to ‘Earth’ is that television has been the propagator of the genre for a very long time. Nevertheless, seeing it in IMAX is a whole different conversation. Overall though, many won’t see or tell the difference with these nature films or its television brethren. Keep your money and rent on DVD ‘March of the Penguins’ or ‘Arctic Tale’ to get your fix of animals roaming on Earth but with a great quotient of entertainment.

Ted Faraone

By

2009/09/01 at 12:00am

State of Play

09.1.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: PG-13 for some violence, language including sexual references, and brief drug content.
Release Date: 2009-04-17
Starring: Matthew Michael Carnahan, Tony Gilroy
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.stateofplaymovie.net/

 Go to our film page

There is something about seeing a bloated overweight, unkempt Russell Crowe that makes one cringe – and put down that black and white cookie.  He’d have done well to follow Shelley Winters’ famous advice about playing fat roles.  However, Crowe’s weight is not what goes awry in “State of Play,” a crime thriller from helmer Kevin Macdonald (“The Last King of Scotland”), although being fat does not add much to his character as Cal McAffrey, a reporter at the “Washington Globe”.
 
Until the final reel, “State of Play” (based on an eponymous BBC Television series), has all the makings of a well made film noire:  Bad weather, dark lighting, ominous music, more plot twists than a back road in Connecticut, and corruption in places high and low.  Why, there are even three murder attempts in the first reel, two of them successful.  Until the final reel the storyline fits together like a well crafted jigsaw puzzle.  It has an excellent cast:  Helen Mirren as foul-mouthed newspaper editor Cameron Lynne, Ben Affleck as philandering congressman Stephen Collins, Robin Wright Penn as his wife, Jeff Daniels as the House Majority Whip, and Jason Bateman as a sleazy, not too bright PR man, each playing his part to perfection. Rachel McAdams is convincing as a newspaper blogger who earns her reporting stripes solving a string of four seemingly unrelated murders in a buddy-film subplot opposite Crowe.
 
Pic opens with a drug addict running from a gunman (Michael Berresse) who catches and kills him.  He also shoots a pizza delivery man who was in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Then the mistress of Congressman Collins, whose committee is investigating the “mercenary” private army on duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, dies mysteriously underneath the wheels of the Washington Metro.  All roads lead to a vast conspiracy with 30 or 40 billion Dollars at stake for the company hoping to profit from the privatization of homeland security at its center.  Crowe’s McAffrey is hot on the trail as dead bodies pile up.  He is also dispensing PR advice to his college roommate, Affleck’s Collins.  Subplots appear to spin out of control but each peels a layer from pic’s onion – until the final reel, that is, when a surprise ending both confuses audiences and leaves unresolved the biggest plot element, the conspiracy and the company at its center – is it real or a red herring?
 
Blame in this case has to be shared.  Screenwriters Matthew Michael Carnahan, Tony Gilroy, and Billy Ray deserve a major chunk.  But many a bad screenplay has been fixed in the edit room.  Take that, Justine Wright.  And one has to ask just how much control Macdonald had over the final cut.  At 127 minutes, it’s not as if the picture had to be fleshed out to feature length.  It coulda been a contender….
 
“State of Play,” distributed in the US by Universal, carries a PG-13 rating, largely due to Mirren’s lines.  Other than that there is little objectionable for children.  But not even adults have a chance of making sense out of it.

Mack Chico

By

2009/09/01 at 12:00am

Sin Nombre

09.1.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.5

Rated: R for violence, language and some sexual content.
Release Date: 2009-03-20
Starring: Cary Fukunaga
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:Mexico, USA
Official Website: No disponible.

 Go to our film page

The dream is reaching America. The nightmare is undertaking the journey to get there. But you know your current circumstances aren’t too promising when New Jersey is represented as a paradise. Writer/director Cary Fukunaga’s film is about illegal immigration only on the surface, and almost none of its running time transpires within the boundaries of the United States. Instead, it’s about the factors that cause some individuals to risk incarceration, deportation, and even death for a chance to cross the border and escape cycles of poverty, disempowerment, and gang violence.

 

Sin Nombre opens by establishing characters who are separated not only by geography but by culture as well. Sayra (Paulina Gaitan) is about to embark on a journey with her father and uncle from her homeland of Hondouras across Mexico into Texas then to New Jersey. The trip is expected to be long and fraught with difficulties but seems to offer more to the young woman than would be available if she remained at home. Meanwhile, north of Sayra in Mexico, Willy (Edgar Flores), nicknamed “Casper,” is a gang member involved in the indoctrination of a new recruit, 12-year old Smiley (Kristian Ferrer). Willy’s gang, led by the fearsome, multi-tatooed Lil Mago (Tenoch Huerta Mejia) is preparing to go to war with a rival group. When Willy lies to Lil Mago about his whereabouts one day – he was spending time with his girlfriend, Martha Marlene (Diana Garcia), instead of helping Smiley make his first kill – the first seeds of a tragedy are sewn. This tragedy will result in Willy and Sayra meeting.

 

Sin Nombre packs an amazing amount of material into a little more than 90 minutes of screen time and, in the process, presents a pair of well-developed characters. Willy’s life is more fully fleshed out than Sayra’s, but that makes sense in the overall scheme of things. The film’s narrative thrust is about Willy finding redemption and making a spiritual trek that parallels his physical journey. Willy has sins to atone for and, when an action closes off a return to his old life, he must cope with his present circumstances. His legacy, as represented by his protégé, Smiley, illustrates why gang influence is so difficult to break. For underdogs and outcasts, participation in a gang provides an opportunity to be respected through fear and intimidation. It’s a brotherhood or sisterhood for children who have no siblings.

 

Although crossing into Texas represents an impediment, Sin Nombre is more concerned with the difficulties and dangers that arise before that climactic part of the trip. In order to make it to the United States, Sarya must evade capture, injury, and death in Mexico. When she meets Willy, her chances of success increase but so too does the possibility that she will become caught in crossfire, the unfortunate victim of being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

 

The film’s director, American Cary Fukunaga, is making his feature debut, and it’s a stunning one. His presentation of details about the trip to the north made by so many along the Mexican railroads evidences the verisimilitude of someone who has investigated the process. Trains become mobile ramshackle villages for wanderers who spread out on boxcar roofs huddled under plastic garbage bags and cluster inside the cars around carefully controlled fires. And when the train pulls into a station where there are known to be inspectors and border guards, the “passengers” get off before the stop is reached, race around the station, then re-board on the other side. The trains don’t move fast but they cover a lot of ground and save the legs and feet of many nomads.

 

One senses that Fukunaga had at least two points he wanted to highlight by telling this story. In the first place, Sin Nombre illustrates the power and terror associated with gang-related violence, something that is on the rise in Mexico and has recently been in the news. Secondly, Fukunaga offers a perspective of some of the tribulations undergone by illegal immigrants. Sin Nombre does not take a “pro” or “con” stance on the issue, but shows that many who embark upon the crossing do so only after enduring hardship.

 

The two young leads, Edgar Flores and Paulina Gaitan, provide believable performances, with Flores’ being a little more eye opening that Gaitan’s. This is due in part to the range of emotions circumstances force upon Willy. Flores is never anything less than completely natural. The chemistry between the two is effectively understated. They do not fall in love in the conventional sense but they come to rely upon and care for one another. What happens at the end may be inevitable but the characters react to it in exactly the way one expects given the manner in which their relationship develops.

 

Ultimately, Sin Nombre is not a happy motion picture, although it’s not a complete downer (it concludes on a hopeful note). It moves rapidly and there’s quite a bit of tension. In the end, the average viewer will feel as if he or she experienced something rather than acting as a mere observer of characters going through the motions. This quality, coupled with the intelligence and perspicacity of the screenplay, makes Sin Nombre more substantive than the average thriller/road movie.

Mack Chico

By

2009/09/01 at 12:00am

Sugar

09.1.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.5

Rated: R for language, some sexuality and brief drug use.
Release Date: 2009-04-03
Starring: Anna Boden, Ryan Fleck
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.sonyclassics.com/sugar/

 Go to our film page

Sugar is about being a stranger in a strange land, when the strange land is America. It’s about the point where ambition falters and reality kicks in. And it’s about baseball – in that order. The established fantasy of the sports movie is confronted with some pretty harsh facts here, about the tiny minority of players both good enough and lucky enough to make it professionally. That customary certainty that all will come good, that the crowd will roar and the music will swell at the bottom of the ninth inning, is anything but a given.

 

Writer-directors Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck pulled off something similar with their first film, the teacher-student drama Half Nelson, by loading it with a subtler freight than that particular genre is usually asked to carry.

 

They are becoming a distinctive team and a valuable one – their stories have clout, their style is lean and forceful. They borrow a formula and adapt it into something real.

 

We have certainly seen the journey of “Sugar” Santos (Algenis Perez Soto) before, or journeys like it: he is a star pitcher in the Dominican Republic, given the chance to join an American training academy for a shot at major-league success. He sends money back home to his family, while impressing the selectors enough to be installed as a fixture in minor-league Kansas City. Sugar’s time there has its ups and downs – a knee injury at the worst possible time, a flirtation with performance-enhancing drugs. As he’s told at the start, there are hundreds of players above him who have already proved themselves, and hundreds below – many of them Dominicans – jostling for a chance to take his place.

 

There are clichés strewn in this this film’s path like unexploded landmines, but weaving their way past them isn’t Boden and Fleck’s only achievement. They dig away honestly at the relationship between effort and success, one that most movies distort in one direction or the other. To try, to fail, to try some more: this never feels like a pre-determined tract about the struggles of a homesick immigrant, and Sugar, winningly played by the complete newcomer Soto, isn’t a cut-out ingenu but a testy, competitive, driven but fallible person. The road he follows is modest, but the film is beautiful and searching in letting him find it for himself.

Jack Rico

By

2009/08/25 at 12:00am

Rudo y Cursi

08.25.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.5

Rated: R for pervasive language, sexual content and brief drug use.
Release Date: 2009-05-08
Starring: Carlos Cuarón
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:Mexico
Official Website: http://www.rudoycursilapelicula.com/

 Go to our film page

“Rudo y Cursi” is a lively and engaging comedy that highlights some drama in its storyline. Regrettably, in the end, feels a little thin, largely because it is unsure of how earnestly to treat its own lessons about fate, ambition and brotherly love. There is a lot of velocity in this ultimately familiar tale of rising and falling, but not much gravity. “Rudo y Cursi” is partly about the consequences of taking a game much too seriously, but at the same time it treats everything else — life, death, love, money — like a game.

 

Beto (Diego Luna) and Tato Verdusco (Gael Garcia Bernal) are half brothers who work together at a banana plantation and live with their extended family in a village in southern Mexico. When the two of them are suddenly (and somewhat improbably) plucked from rural proletarian obscurity and turned into professional soccer players in Mexico City, they achieve fame as Rudo and Cursi, nicknames that can be translated more or less as tough and corny.

 

But Mr. Cuarón also has trouble managing the tone of the film as it swerves from light-hearted absurdity toward a darker, more cynical view of its characters and their fate. Too often he allows “Rudo y Cursi” to coast on the likeability of its stars, who seem at times to be enjoying themselves more than their characters are able to.

Alex Florez

By

2009/08/24 at 12:00am

Duplicity

08.24.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: PG-13 for language and some sexual content.
Release Date: 2009-03-20
Starring: Tony Gilroy
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.duplicitymovie.net/

 Go to our film page

At its core, Duplicity is a romantic caper about two spies that have left the world of government intelligence for a scheme to cash in on a highly profitable cold war raging between two big rival corporations.  The problem is, half the movie goes by before we can figure that out.

Duplicity feels a lot like one of the Ocean’s Eleven movies with the romantic dynamic of Mr. & Mrs. Smith, but its plot is wound up tighter than it really needs to be. Director Tony Gilroy (Michael Clayton, The Bourne Identity) seems to be overly concerned with keeping his audience guessing, virtually adding a plot twist wherever he can in the film.  Yes, for most of it we don’t quite know who’s good, who’s bad or who’s double crossing who, but at some points we’re also utterly confused. To make matters worse, this is one of those movies where the timeline isn’t linear and the events are completely shuffled around.

But let’s face it, at the root of this whole thing is a love story in which all those other details don’t really matter much.  For all of the intricacies Gilroy writes into the film, all we really care about is the fate of the two spies – as lovers.  Fortunately for us, both Julia Roberts and Clive Owen are total pros at being charmingly ‘duplicitous’, and thanks to them, the film is solidly entertaining.  Let’s remember how creepily untrustworthy they both were in Mike Nichols’ Closer. 

Of course, this isn’t The Bourne Identity nor is it Michael Clayton, and as far as romantic capers go, the endings are never as deceitful. Wink wink.

Jack Rico

By

2009/08/18 at 12:00am

Tyson

08.18.2009 | By |

Rating: 4.0

Rated: R for language including sexual references.
Release Date: 2009-04-24
Starring: James Toback
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.sonyclassics.com/tyson/

 Go to our film page

‘Tyson’ is an insightful biopic on arguably the greatest heavyweight boxer who ever lived. If you were a witness to his tumultuous personal and professional boxing career, this documentary clears up all, if not many of the rumors and debauchery he became notorious for: the biting of Evander Holyfield’s ear, the rape charges and the Don King attack to mention a few.

Indie director James Toback directs this portrait of ‘Iron’ Mike Tyson where he manages to extract, without inhibition, information about his womanizing, alcohol and drug addiction, bouts of mental instability, and criminal activity in great detail. Through a mixture of original interviews and archival footage and photographs, the film ranges from Tyson’s earliest memories of growing up on the mean streets of Brooklyn through his entry into the world of boxing, to his rollercoaster ride of worldwide fame and fortunes won and lost.

You might be surprised with the Tyson who narrates this movie. He is different from the monster built up and torn down by the media during the ’80s and ’90s. Age often brings perspective, and that would seem to be the case here. His explanations and views of the mischievous events of his dark days might not satisfy you, but what you have to appreciate is the sincerity and surrendering that Toback manages to withdraw from a man known to have a volatile and fractured mind. In terms of visual stylistics, there is a film quality that Toback directs with in contrast to the sensationalistic and over-dramatized VH-1 show ‘Behind the Music’ or Barbara Walters’ special interviews where the questions are crafted to draw tears from the interviewees. Here it is just you and him.

There are some scenes with heavy language so I wouldn’t suggest bringing children to see it. If in fact ‘Tyson’ is a spin free of publicist intervention documentary, it is a remarkable look inside the mind of a ‘killing machine’ who became a docile beast ready to welcome peace within himself. If you are a fan, you’ll enjoy it and if you’re not, it’s one informative retrospective at a living boxing legend.

Jack Rico

By

2009/08/18 at 12:00am

The Last House on the Left

08.18.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.5

Rated: R for sadistic brutal violence including a rape and disturbing images, language, nudity and some drug use.
Release Date: 2009-03-13
Starring: Adam Alleca, Carl Ellsworth
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.thelasthouseontheleft.com/

 Go to our film page

‘The Last House on the Left’ is as uncomfortable a film as I have ever seen. Uncomfortable because the movie possesses elements that blur the lines between violence, abuse and entertainment. Cinematically, the film is arresting through and through due the high caliber of the production, the reliable and convincing acting performances and its engrossing premise to boot. But how can one recommend a movie that possesses a barbaric rape scene, as a good cinematic selection? It is a complex response, but ultimately, you need to be the judge.

This is the third remake of ‘The Last House on the Left’. In 1972, the first feature effort of Wes Craven, was a reworking of Ingmar Bergman’s 1960 picture, The Virgin Spring, which won the 1961 Best Foreign Language Film Oscar. This third version, is more reminiscent to the 1972 edition. The story takes place after the kidnapping and butchering of two female teenagers. The guilty gang unknowingly finds refuge with the parents of one of the victims, hosts who devise a gruesome revenge.

Women be forewarned. If you have never been privy to scenes of sexual abuse, this is not the film to get acquainted with it. The rape scene images seen here are some of the most gruesome, disturbing and down right reprehensible ever committed to a Hollywood film. I’m not sure many will be able to withstand it and walking out of the theater just might be your best option. But if you can cover your eyes and get through it, there is a redeeming third act that will quench your thirst for revenge. 

After seeing the entire film, I must say, Greek director Dennis Illiadis was a fantastic director who maintained a level of dread, suspense and retribution throughout the whole film. This is not a horror movie but a highly intense thriller that works the mind to feel contempt in its first half then vindication in its denouement.

‘The Last House on the Left’ is not a “pretty” movie, but it does challenge the boundaries of entertainment, and hopefully with an open mind, you’ll be the one entertained.

Select a Page