Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Movie Reviews

Mike Pierce

By

2009/02/17 at 12:00am

Quarantine

02.17.2009 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: R for bloody violent and disturbing content, terror and language.
Release Date: 2008-10-10
Starring: John Erick Dowdle, Drew Dowdle
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.containthetruth.com/

 Go to our film page

Here’s what I thought about the horror film Quarantine, but first off, here’s a little plot summary:

Television reporter Angela Vidal (Jennifer Carpenter) and her cameraman (Steve Harris) are assigned to spend the night shift with a Los Angeles Fire Station. After a routine 911 call takes them to a small apartment building, they find police officers already on the scene in response to blood curdling screams coming from one of the apartment units. They soon learn that a woman living in the building has been infected by something unknown. After a few of the residents are viciously attacked, they try to escape with the news crew in tow, only to find that the CDC has quarantined the building. Phones, Internet, televisions and cell phone access have been cut-off, and officials are not relaying information to those locked inside. When the quarantine is finally lifted, the only evidence of what took place is the news crew’s videotape.

NOW…what did I think about it you ask…it was ok. I thought it was going to be better. I mean, the “zombie like people” (I’ll keep it like that so I don’t give away the TRUE story) were dope…but, that’s about it. The whole movie is played back by the camera guy – the camera jerks, moves in all directions! That was pretty annoying. Ladies, you’ll be happy – Jay Hernandez is in the movie. He was cool. Guys, if your looking for a good “date movie in October.” – – go check it out.

I give Quarantine…3 out of 5 Popcorns!

Jack Rico

By

2009/02/13 at 12:00am

Friday the 13th

02.13.2009 | By |

Rated: R for strong bloody violence, some graphic sexual content, language and drug material.
Release Date: 2009-02-13
Starring: Damian Shannon, Mark Swift
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: www.fridaythe13thmovie.com

Go to our film page

Friday the 13th

Cinematically, ‘Friday the 13th’ is an awful film parceled with some terrible acting, an uninspired script and unimaginative direction…but god damn was it fun! And that’s what these movies are all about – zoning out, laughing out loud with your buddies and enjoying an innocuous time at the theater.

Relating this premise to you is useless since there really isn’t one to relate. It possesses all the cliches of hundreds of slasher films: bare breasts, gruesome decapitations and laughable dialogues. Not mush else to it. The producers missed a big chance to create something special with Jason and his origins.

 

The first 15 minutes are perhaps the best the film has to offer since it’s very fast paced, but then it slows down and any tension that was established is doused. Nevertheless, it is fun and that’s what people who watch these type of films are looking for.

Jack Rico

By

2009/02/13 at 12:00am

Confessions of a Shopaholic

02.13.2009 | By |

Rated: PG for some mild language and thematic elements.
Release Date: 2009-02-13
Starring: Tracey Jackson, Tim Firth
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://www.shopaholicmovie.com/

Go to our film page

Confessions of a Shopaholic

‘Confessions of a Shopaholic’ has a simple story line with an adorable and charming protagonist and an uplifting and empowering kick to it. It’s a mix between the charm of ‘Legally Blonde’ and the glitz and glam of ‘The Devil Wears Prada’.

Based on the novel “Confessions of a Shopaholic” by Sophie Kinsella, the plot has a college grad (Isla Fisher) landing a job as a financial journalist in New York City to support her shopping addiction. She then later falls for a wealthy entrepreneur (Hugh Dancy), but there are some trip ups along the way.

The film is a romantic comedy that is more comedy than romance. It’s target audience is  transparently women who live in cities and have a slight addiction to shopping. The plot has many ridiculous notions in it which is why the overall appeal isn’t engaging, unlike its lead actress who is by far the best the movie has to offer. The rest of the cast which includes the likes of Joan Cusack, John Goodman, John Lithgow and – are you ready for this? –  Kristin Scott Thomas as the french editor of a high power fashion magazine, are too talented for the film. This only reaffirms our suspicions that the economic recession affects ALL of us.

The backdrop of New York City is once again a film co-star and it’s hard to argue why. There is something to be said about a New York romantic comedy, it exudes an energy and allure that is almost impossible to match.

If you want to laugh, giggle and hug your significant other this Valentine’s, this is film will do the trick!

Jack Rico

By

2009/02/13 at 12:00am

The International

02.13.2009 | By |

Rated: R for some sequences of violence and language.
Release Date: 2009-02-13
Starring: Eric Singer
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA, Germany
Official Website: http://www.everybodypays.com/

Go to our film page

The International

The International is a complicated film with an intricate plot line and lackluster acting. It’s only redeeming qualities are its action sequences and fast paced direction.

The premise is hard to follow: Interpol Agent Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) and Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) are determined to bring to justice one of the world’s most powerful banks. Uncovering myriad and reprehensible illegal activities, Salinger and Whitman follow the money from Berlin to Milan to New York to Istanbul. Finding themselves in a high-stakes chase across the globe, their relentless tenacity puts their own lives at risk as their targets will stop at nothing – even murder – to continue financing terror and war.

Naomi Watts gave the worst performance in her career. It’s as if she has become worse over the years beginning with King Kong. Clive Owen is no Jason Bourne, but is believable enough that the credibility of the film isn’t compromised.

Be ready for what will be the most talked about action sequence of the early new year – the Guggenheim museum shooting frenzy is well worth the watch.

For a production that aspires to be so much more than a typical thriller, The International’s convoluted premise and Naomi’s painful acting achieves only to convey an average movie experience.

Ted Faraone

By

2009/02/10 at 12:00am

Nights in Rodanthe

02.10.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.0

Rated: PG-13 for some sensuality.
Release Date: 2008-09-26
Starring: Ann Peacock, John Romano, Nicholas Sparks (novela)
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA, Australia
Official Website: http://nightsinrodanthe.warnerbros.com/

 Go to our film page

“Nights in Rodanthe” could have been a world class chick flick on the order of “Now Voyager.”  It has everything going for it:  Beautiful photography, a tear-jerker plot, and a great cast.  Instead it barely makes the “Lifetime Original Movie” cut.  The adaptation of Nicholas Sparks’ eponymous novel (by Ann Peacock and John Romano) squeezes every moment of angst and despair until the audience cries “uncle.”
 
Diane Lane as Adrienne Willis, mother of two, separating from womanizing Jack (Chris Meloni), delivers a nuanced performance that aspires to Vanessa Redgrave’s territory.  Richard Gere as middle-aged Dr. Paul Flanner neatly captures the emotional disconnection, impatience, and intellectual arrogance of many successful careerists.  Viola Davis (Jean) as Adrienne’s sexy best friend steals her every scene.  Lensing by Affonso Beato is top notch, and a hurricane, which marks pic’s turning point, is so real that one wants to run for higher ground.
 
A coincidence puts Adrienne and Paul together as sole residents of a beachfront inn on the island of Rodanthe on the outer banks of North Carolina.  Adrienne gave up a promising career as an artist to marry Jack.  Paul abandoned surgery after losing a patient on the table.  He’s at the inn because of a summons to the island from the dead patient’s husband (Ted Manson).  She’s there because she promised to spell Jean, who is off to Miami.  His family has fallen apart.  Hers is in danger of doing so.  The pair fall for each other.  Paul heads to South America to re-connect with his son, a physician, who runs a clinic for the poor – after a contrived emotional showdown with Adrienne over his handling of the widower.
 
The rest of the story is told through love letters and another contrived scene:  Paul misses a dinner date with Adrienne on his return from South America.  The next morning she answers her door to find Paul’s son (James Franco) with a box of his dad’s belongings.  Franco’s voiceover of sepia tinted scenes of dad working with him in the mountain clinic (culminating in a fatal mudslide) could have ended the flick.  Instead, it goes on for another agonizing reel, in which Adrienne’s despair is milked dry.  Blame helmer George C. Wolfe and editor Brian A. Kates.  Not even Lane can lift the platitudinous dénouement off the ground.  All main characters are redeemed, but at what a cost!  And it is borne by the audience.
 
But wait!  There’s more!  A final scene appears to have been tacked on in the interest of a happy ending.  It is set up by a couple of script references to wild horses on Rodanthe.  They appear not a moment too soon.
 
The 97 minute Warner Bros. release carries a PG-13 rating due to some sexual content.

Ted Faraone

By

2009/02/10 at 12:00am

Blindness

02.10.2009 | By |

Rating: 2.5

Rated: R for violence including sexual assaults, language and sexuality/nudity.
Release Date: 2008-10-03
Starring: Don McKellar
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://blindness-themovie.com/

 Go to our film page

Anyone who has problems with cinematic squalor should avoid “Bilndness”, helmer Fernando Meirelles vehicle for Julianne Moore released via Miramax.  Much of it is set in a detention center for the newly blind, a facility lacking doctors, nurses, and even janitors.  After what appears to be a couple of months, judging by Moore’s roots, it — and the cast – get pretty filthy.
 
An unexplained epidemic of blindness overcomes a deliberately unidentified cosmopolitan city.  Authorities quarantine the blind, surrounding them with trigger-happy guards.  Among the first to suffer blindness are an eye-doctor (Mark Ruffalo) and a wealthy Japanese (Yusuke Iseya).  When police arrive to arrest the eye-doctor, his wife (Julianne Moore), who can see, feigns blindness and insists on joining him in detention.  There follows a sort of Milgram Experiment in human depravity among the detainees.  Hierarchies develop.  Villains are totally villainous.  Good guys, including the characters played by Ruffalo and Moore, are at turns fearful, courageous, smart, stupid, hopeful, hopeless, resentful, and angry.  Meanwhile, the outside world collapses as blindness spreads.  We know this because an old man with an eye patch (Danny Glover) has smuggled in a radio.
 
The bad guys commandeer the food, holding it for ransom.  Once the good guys run out of valuables, the bad guys demand their women.  Moore’s character (nobody has a name) leads a revolt in a sort of perverted Lysistrata without the jokes – foreshadowed by repeated shots of a sharp scissors.
 
Meirelles directs with a sort of moral neutrality. The asylum of the blind, like much of the rest of the picture, is shot with multiple cameras to good effect. One feels more like a voyeur than part of a theater audience.  Moore gets kudos for portraying a sighted person who has to act blind to fool her captors.
 
In the final reels the captives escape detention only to find the entire city, if not the world, has succumbed to blindness.  The electricity failed, shops are looted, trains no longer run, and hungry dogs eat the dead.  Yet amid a sudden rainstorm a sort of community develops as blind people, weeks without clean water or sanitary services strip and wash in nature’s shower.  It presages an ambivalent conclusion, almost holding the mirror up to the audience.
 
“Blindness,” an adaptation of Portuguese author José Saramago’s novel by Don McKellar (who also plays a blinded thief) is not easy to watch.  Because most trappings – backstory, names, a recognizable setting, an explanation for the epidemic – in other words most of the context – are stripped away – attention is focused on a compelling if unpleasant story, which feels shorter its 120 minute length.
 
Tech credits are excellent.  Lensing by César Charlone and editing by Daniel Rezende shine.  Special mention goes to production designers Matthew Davies and Tulé Peak.  Pic is rated R due to nudity (the blind can’t see each other naked), sex, and violence.

Jack Rico

By

2009/02/09 at 12:00am

Coraline (Movie Review)

02.9.2009 | By |

Coraline, based on a short book by Neil Gaiman, is an entertaining 3-D experience that manages to tell a captivating kids story with an edge that adults can enjoy.

The movie tells the story of a young girl (Fanning) who  through a secret door in her new home and discovers an alternate version of her life. On the surface, this parallel reality is eerily similar to her real life – only much better. But when her adventure turns dangerous, and her counterfeit parents (including Other Mother [Hatcher]) try to keep her forever, Coraline must count on her resourcefulness, determination, and bravery to get back home – and save her family.

Selick’s animated style is almost smooth enough to be mistaken for CGI, but there’s a texture to the approach that betrays it as being a little more labor intensive.  Kids likely won’t notice the difference, but adults will appreciate that the movie doesn’t feel like a generic clone of the animated product that studios are pumping out with regularity. Selick’s bizarre streak is given ample opportunity to be on display. His tendencies to favor gothic backdrops and to develop his characters in such a way that they look like they have emerged from an Edward Gorey illustration makes the film potentially intense for young, nightmare-prone children. This is the basis for the PG (not G) rating.

The plot is interesting enough to involve viewers of all ages. Despite the incorporation of familiar elements, it provides some surprises and the narrative trajectory is not predictable from start to finish. The vocal characterizations, mostly provided by actors without distinctive voices, are strong. Dakota Fanning makes the young heroine instantly likeable and Teri Hatcher has no difficulty with aspects of her role that force her into Wicked Witch territory. Selick may have incorporated a little of Fanning and Hatcher’s looks into their animated counterparts, although nothing is overt.

Like all effective fables, Coraline isn’t only for children, although it would, I suspect, work as a bed-time story. One of my biggest problems with many animated movies is that they are pitched at an intellectual level below me, but I didn’t feel that way about Coraline. The film has been crafted with a consideration that the best family movies appeal not only to a young target audience but to the parents who accompany their offspring to theaters. And, while the 3D experience may make Coraline a little more eye-catching, it is by no means mandatory for those wishing to enjoy what this visually intriguing production has to offer.

[youtube id=”vlv4yzsmwyI”]

Jack Rico

By

2009/02/06 at 12:00am

He’s Just Not That Into You

02.6.2009 | By |

Rated: PG-13 for sexual content and brief strong language.
Release Date: 2009-02-06
Starring: Abby Kohn, Marc Silverstein
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: www.hesjustnotthatintoyoumovie.com

Go to our film page

He's Just Not That Into You
Mike Pierce

By

2009/02/05 at 12:00am

Push

02.5.2009 | By |

Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and action, brief strong language, smoking and a scene of teen drinking.
Release Date: 2009-02-06
Starring: David Bourla
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://www.push-themovie.com/

Go to our film page

Push

WOOWWWWW…what do I say about PUSH?! It SUCKED! SOOOOOO…bad! I thought this movie was going to be “a little” cool – WRONG! The movie was total garbage…people, PLEASE don’t waste your money on the flick…luckily, I saw it for free. Lots of things went wrong…as soon as it started…the surround sound wasn’t working, then the film wasn’t centered right, then these people next to us were speaking some language I couldn’t understand…all the way through the movie, then…the movie just sucked!
 
It’s pretty much about this group of people – through experiment after experiment – get telekinetic and clairvoyant powers. There’s good guys and there’s bad guys. The soundtrack sucks – the acting isn’t all that great – there’s this girl (Camilla Belle) in the movie…that just bugged me. (I liked her better in 10,000 B.C.)
 
There IS one thing good about this movie I DID like…it’s Dakota Fanning. She is dope in the movie…she just rocks! Heck, I only saw it because of her.
 
So people, if your NOT a Dakota fan…don’t waste your $$.
 
I give Push…1 out of 5 Popcorns! (1 for Dakota)
 
P.S. Anyone know how I can get 2 hours of my life back?! (lol)

Have a cold week! (lol)

Alex Florez

By

2009/01/29 at 12:00am

Taken

01.29.2009 | By |

Rated: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence, disturbing thematic material, sexual content, some drug references and language.
Release Date: 2009-01-30
Starring: Luc Besson, Robert Mark Kamen
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: France
Official Website: http://www.takenmovie.com/

Go to our film page

Taken

For years now, french filmmaker Luc Besson (The Transporter) has been hemorrhaging preposterous action films that are wildly unsophisticated in their storytelling but that are also inexplicably entertaining.  Taken is no exception. 

Yet the Besson-written screenplay is directed by another frenchmen, Pierre Morel, who at least for this film, happens to share his exact same sensibility:  A reckless disregard for character development because the order of the day is a ‘shoot-em up thriller’.

Unsurprisingly then, the film’s premise is pretty straightforward. It centers on a former government operative named Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson) who is on the hunt for a fearsome organization that has taken his daughter Kim (Maggie Grace), with whom he has just started to rekindle a relationship with.  After being absent for most of her life, Mills will terrorize all of Paris hunting down the band of kidnappers to prove his fatherhood.

Despite its slow beginning, hokey dialogue, and poor acting on everyone’s account (Maggie Grace being especially unbearable), the film doesn’t ever pretend to be more than it really is. It’s just strange to see Neeson, such an accomplished actor, playing the type of role usually reserved for people like Jason Statham. 

I know what I’m getting into when when I watch these films and so I’m rarely disappointed.  And If you have the slightest appetite for the genre, then it should be an easy 90 minutes of film to watch.

Taken is the type of film that easily gets filed under the ‘really bad films I’d watch category’.

Select a Page