Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Movie Reviews

Jack Rico

By

2012/06/18 at 12:00am

To Rome with Love

06.18.2012 | By |

To Rome with Love

‘To Rome with Love’ is unequivocally a perfectly imperfect Woody Allen comedy that uses four very funny Italian vignettes to convey distinct reflective lessons on life. With his expected all star cast, including Spanish actress Penélope Cruz, Allen extracts all the beauty and charm of Rome, while injecting his indelible quirky, witty, and yes, outlandish humor to his latest narrative. At times you will laugh thunderously, but I must confess, for some brief points, you’ll be swept into bouts of a story gone astray, tethered to repetitive and stationary dialogue, unlike his previous film ‘Midnight in Paris’ which had a much tighter script. But even in his hiccup moments, Allen eventually finds a way to return the story to an intelligible, entertaining and pleasing culmination. This is not one of his top ten masterworks, but it does possess enough moments of utter brilliance worth your reveling in.

The plot begins with a traffic officer, an everyday Roman, giving us a succinct exposition about the millions of stories Rome provides on a daily basis. He then highlights four vignettes that introduce our characters and their intrinsic and comical stories: a well-known American architect reliving his youth; an average middle-class Roman who suddenly finds himself Rome’s biggest celebrity; a young provincial couple drawn into separate romantic encounters; and an American opera director endeavoring to put a singing mortician on stage (by far the funniest of them all).

Each of the four stories told here have its share of comical strengths and weaknesses, but perhaps the best written one is Alec Baldwin’s. His is the most ambiguously interesting and substantial of the tales told. It’s ingenious, sharp, engrossing and uses many artistic tricks reminiscent from ‘Annie Hall’ to convey Allen’s existential message.

Baldwin plays a well-known American architect named John who is vacationing in Rome, where he once lived in his youth. Walking in his former neighborhood he encounters Jack (Jesse Eisenberg), a young man not unlike himself. As he watches Jack fall head-over-heels for Monica (Ellen Page), his girlfriend Sally’s (Greta Gerwig) dazzling and flirtatious friend, John relives one of the most romantically painful episodes of his own life. Throughout, John, for some inexplicable and mysterious reason, slips in and out of scenes, begging the question – is John reliving flashbacks of his youth as an imagined young Jack, or is Jack a real person who is getting wise romantic advise from a sage in John? Whatever the answer is, this is something that Allen has done deliberately. According to Allen, the safest way to view this imaginative and enigmatic device is with Alec’s character taking a walk down memory lane, meeting his youth in spirit, remembering what had gone on, the mistakes he made, and having that as a memory he never got over. Jack can be said to be John’s youth without being young John in flashback.

The second most astute and insightful episode, though not as abridged as the aforementioned, is the strange and riddling story of Leopoldo Pisanello (Roberto Benigni). He is an exceptionally boring guy, who wakes up one morning and finds himself one of the most famous men in Italy without reason. Soon the paparazzi trail his every move and question his every motivation. As Leopoldo grows accustomed to the varied seductions of the limelight, he gradually realizes the cost of fame. The ending is profound and paradoxical. Just looking at Benigni can crack a rib from how funny he looks and acts.

Penélope Cruz in the meantime teams up in another Woody Allen movie since she won her first Oscar for Allen’s “Vicky Cristina Barcelona” (which was also the first for a Spanish actress) to play a witty and very seductive Italian escort. Regrettably, I don’t think she’ll be winning any Oscars in this role. She is in the least interesting of the storylines. Cruz plays Anna, a hired prostitute who ends up becoming a teacher, companion and therapist in the life of Antonio (Alessandro Tiberi) who has arrived from the provinces in Rome hoping to impress his straight-laced relatives with his lovely new wife Milly (Alessandra Mastronardi) so that he can get an upscale big city job. Through comic misunderstanding and chance, he and his wife are separated for the day. Antonio ends up passing off Cruz as his wife, while Milly (his real wife) is romanced by legendary movie star Luca Salta (Antonio Alban). Cruz is a fantastic actress who showcases her ability to act more than just in Spanish and English. Here she speaks Italian with ease and authenticity, as if she were born in Rome. It’s a remarkable skill for any actor to do, specially in movies. Curious enough, her next movie is “Venuto al Mundo” an Italian film.

But the undeniably funniest storyline is that of undertaker Giancarlo (renowned tenor Fabio Armiliato) who sings arias worthy of La Scala while only lathering up in the shower. What is also special about this vignette is Woody Allen. Not only did Allen write and direct the film, but he also makes his first acting appearance since 2006’s forgettable movie – ‘Scoop’ – starring Hugh Jackman. Convinced that talent that prodigious cannot be kept hidden, retired Jerry (Woody Allen) clutches at the opportunity to promote Giancarlo and rejuvenate his own career as an opera director. There is some really hilarious scenes that will make you embarrass yourself from how loud you will laugh. Whenever you encounter a movie that can provoke such reactions, it is an obligation to see. This chapter alone is worth the price of your ticket. Also, Allen’s return to acting is a big deal since we get to see in action the man who created the neurotic persona in film. It really is priceless to see him act. He’ll also surprisingly be acting in “Fading Gigolo” with Colombian actress Sofia Vergara, a John Turturro film releasing in 2013.

Overall, Allen has hits and misses here, though, the brilliant comedic moments, full of unmanageable laughter, do outweigh the slow and dragging moments.

As I watched the last minutes of ‘To Rome with Love’, I fondly remembered my visit to Roma with much enthusiasm. It left me with a nostalgic feeling about its glorious past and its restored faith in its present and future. Very similarly, it is in many ways the way I look at Allen’s milestone film career – one with a great past, but with a renewed sense of creative confidence that reminds me why he is a global cinematic treasure. It’s not invention, Allen has clearly gotten a second wind, and overall, it has been fun to watch.

Karen Posada

By

2012/06/13 at 12:00am

Rock of Ages

06.13.2012 | By |

Rock of Ages

To describe ‘Rock of Ages’ I’m going to need to use various synonyms for cheesy, because that was the main thought going through my mind while I watched the film. The music rocks, there’s no doubt about that; everything else around it wasn’t good enough to classify this as a good musical. I unfortunately haven’t seen the Broadway musical this film is based on, but I’m not afraid to guarantee that it’s probably better than this film adaptation.  

 

The film is set in 1987 in Los Angeles where a small town girl, Sherrie (Julianne Hough) comes hoping to begin her singing career, shortly after arriving she ends up in the Bourbon Room, a famous rock club where she meets Drew (Diego Boneta). Drew begs the club’s owner, Dennis Dupree (Alec Baldwin) to give Sherri a waitressing job, thanks to Lonny (Russell Brand) Dennis’ right hand he decides to give the girl a chance. The Bourbon Room is at risk when religious groups led by the Major (Bryan Cranston) and his wife, Patricia Whitmore (Catherine Zeta-Jones) threaten to close it down, specially when rock god Stacee Jaxx (Tom Cruise) shows up to perform with his group –Arsenal- one last time. With L.A. as a stage this group of people try to lead their lives surrounded by rock n roll from the likes of Def Leppard, Journey, Foreigner, etc.

 

It looked like most of the actors in this movie were just lip-synching, which whether that’s the case or not that made it hard to enjoy it as a musical. My favorite acts though were seeing Boneta on stage as well as Cruise; they rocked the house in and out of the screen. Their acting as well as everyone else’s was pretty questionable though. Cruise’s character is eccentric and entertaining with his overly macho jockstraps and tattoos, his rockstar act though might be right on, with his short attention span it was hard to follow or understand. I’m not sure if I was annoyed at Hough’s character or at herself, neither her voice nor her acting were convincing; sure she’s stunning, but that wasn’t enough. 

 

I would like to say that our young Mexican actor, Boneta, was fabulous, but except for a couple of good singing skits his acting was like seeing a puppy follow commands. Boneta is one of the main characters, so he had a glorious amount of screen time, despite of that he didn’t shine except for his first singing opening number (clip below) as well as his closing number. He definitely has potential to carry over his heartthrob skills from his Rebelde days; there is some chemistry between Hough and him, but it wasn’t exploded to the point of making believable their fairytale story.  

 

Baldwin and Brand presented some funny scenes, but their main act is actually offensive. The movie began dragging after the first act, perhaps because of the various montages; I was ready for it to finish around the first hour (It’s two hours). The corniness of the film just kept escalating until it reached a level of ridiculous.

 

I can honestly say I really enjoy musicals and was disappointed by the result of this star-studded film. Even though director Adam Shankman also made ‘Hairspray’, another Broadway hit musical into a film filled with Hollywood A-listers and was well received he didn’t achieve the same with this one. With that said I suggest you save your pennies and go see the musical on Broadway, I’m sure you will be satisfied and entertained then.   

 

Check out Mexican actor Diego Boneta “rocking out” in ‘Rock of Ages’ in the video below.

Karen Posada

By

2012/06/06 at 12:00am

Prometheus

06.6.2012 | By |

Prometheus

‘Prometheus’ is not a film for the squeamish, but if you can get past that it’s a mysterious adventure that will surely keep you glued to the screen. The 3D shots are beautiful, crisp and shocking at times; it is definitely worth the extra bucks. The film poses and teases us with intriguing questions about our origins in a semi scientific setting, without a doubt it will give you and your friends tons to talk about and discuss once it is over.

 

Set in the not so distant future in 2089, a group of scientists exploring caves prompt a space exploration that takes place a few years later in 2093. On board of the amazing sculpted ship named Prometheus we meet David (Michael Fassbender), a robotic man who gives us a tour of the ship. In the journey we meet the first in command, Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron), a controlling woman who is cold and seems to hold a grudge against all for no apparent reason. We learn that Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce) funded this trip, convinced by scientists: Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) to find an answer to humanity’s origins. The rest of the crew is: geologist Fifield (Sean Harris), Millburn (Rafe Spall), the ship’s captain Janek (Idris Elba). Together they venture into a new world searching for answers and end up finding more than they bargain for.   

 

You will be captivated not only by the storyline, but also by the images of landscapes, alien scenarios and especially of Prometheus; the ‘Star Wars’ like spaceship. One thing to remember is that this film by Ridley Scott is based indirectly on his ‘Alien’ movie, but mainly on Damon Lindelof script; this man is best known for his work in the TV series ‘Lost’, a show that kept many entertained and was an expert in posing unanswered questions. That’s said as a warning about the product these two men created together, an entertaining two hours that will leave you with more questions than answers.

 

Fassbender easily steals the film; he is such an amazing actor that has slowly, but surely shown his versatility and skills in plenty of worthwhile movies, including this one. I was a bit disappointed by Theron’s placement in the movie, as she’s mainly just a background annoyance and I know she can be so much more. Pearce’s transformation is well done, he’s also hard to identify. Finally, Rapace seems to combine some of her best acting skills into this character, but mainly more so because of her determination and actions than what comes out of her mouth.

 

There’s no denying that the script lacks in certain places, whether it’s apathy or answers; but most of all it starts getting foggy and muddled, such as with some scenes that seem random and revelations from characters that come out of nowhere and don’t seem to follow a pattern. There are also some typical movie scenes, where some characters want to be the heroes and some make poor unintelligent choices.

 

Above all that, what moves the story is the mystery behind it, which although at points it gets frustrating it somehow works; probably also thanks to the amazing imagery and well done graphics. The reason why ‘Prometheus’ is worth seeing is because any good film leaves you talking and thinking about it afterwards, and this one fulfills that job.   

Karen Posada

By

2012/06/05 at 12:00am

Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted

06.5.2012 | By |

Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted

Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted’ is an adorable, fun, adventure for the whole family, with some minor setbacks. The 3D version of the film pops out with florescent colors, shapes and stunts, which kids are sure to love. The biggest set back is the storyline, in the sense that kids will surely want to go pay a visit to the circus thinking it’s a place where wild animals belong and this idea I can’t endorse; unless the parents are conscious enough to explain that this movie is the best way to enjoy that experience.

 

In the third installment of this successful franchise the four friends that were stranded in Madagascar: Alex the lion (Ben Stiller), Marty the zebra (Chris Rock), Gloria de hippo (Jada Pinkett Smith) and Melman the giraffe (David Schwimmer); decide they miss the big city where they came from, NYC and it is time to return home. First they must take a detour through Europe with the help of the two lemurs King Julien XIII (Sacha Baron Cohen) and Maurice (Cedric the Entertainer). The only way they can safely do that, so that an evil animal control officer Capitaine Chantel DuBois (France McDormand) doesn’t catch them is by joining a traveling circus. Here we are introduced to a couple of thrilling new characters, including Stefano the Italian Sea lion (Martin Short).  

 

The movie is filled with funny moments and a lot of entertaining action, including the chase scenes in Monte Carlo. This animated film is so keen on detail that is hard not to appreciate the beautiful shots, such as the ones taken in the streets of Rome with precise images of the Coliseum, the Vatican and Capitoline hill. The light show in the last sequence is hypnotizing with all the colors and shapes. The soundtrack is full of upbeat music, which adds more entertainment to the film.

 

Capitaine Chantel DuBois is one of the best evil characters I’ve seen in a children’s movie, she is a combination of animals inside a superhuman which makes her unstoppable and unmatchable; obviously great work on McDormand part as well as the animation crew. All the original characters are just as quirky and silly as in the past movies, specially Rock and his character Marty; Stiller’s lion is still the brains behind it all, Pinkett Smith’s hippo is the “mom” – as she described in our interview- and voice of reason to all specially to Schwimmer’s giraffe. Short’s Stefano the sea lion is my favorite new character and Bryan Cranston’s tiger Vitaly is not far behind.

 

All in all, I enjoyed the movie because of the captivating animation and job well done by the actors. My biggest fear is that it might represent the wrong idea as what a circus that has animals is like, wild animals do not belong in a circus and they are not meant to entertain humans. That point being made clear by this reviewer, I hope people keep that in the back of their minds and opt instead to enjoy this movie for what it is, a fictional work that doesn’t represent at all what a real animal circus hides behinds the scenes.

Karen Posada

By

2012/05/30 at 12:00am

High School

05.30.2012 | By |

High School

Here’s another pointless, not very funny and brain dead teen comedy ‘High School’. It has a clear set, easy to follow pattern but it’s so formulaic, predictable and ridiculous that is hard to enjoy it. Yes there are some laughs and crazy scenarios, but not much different from other better teen movies that are actually fun and funny to watch to give a recent example ‘Project X’.

 

Senior Henry Burke (Matt Bush) is persuaded by the school’s biggest stoner Breaux (Sean Marquette) to try marijuana for the first time. In the meantime, principal Gordon (Michael Chiklis) enforces a mandatory drug test in the school, due to many students that have been caught under the influence. Afraid of getting expelled and loosing his college scholarship Henry teams up with Breaux, who comes up with the idea to get the whole school high by spiking the school’s bake sale of brownies. Their biggest obstacle is drug dealer Psycho Ed (Adrien Brody), who is out to hunt them after they steal his most powerful stash. They must find a way of avoiding the crazy drug dealer, as well as their school’s principal in order for their plan to work.

 

The movie seems to get just as high as the characters do, because the scenes get more ridiculous by the minute. It is a shame to see an actor like Brody taking part of such a mindless project, specially representing a character that has the concentration span of a goldfish. The movie has all the elements to be comedic as well as entertaining, but the premise just falls apart by the predictable scenarios, weak dialogue and nonsensical storyline.

 

There’s no reason to spend 100 minutes of your life in this movie, when there’s plenty of other teen comedies that have achieved the comedy this one tries very hard get.   

Karen Posada

By

2012/05/21 at 12:00am

Men In Black 3

05.21.2012 | By |

Men In Black 3

Men in Black III’ comes a decade later after ‘Men in Black II’, despite of the amount of time that separate them and it being part of the franchise, it stands well on its on. Clearly director Barry Sonnenfeld still knows what works for Men in Black and its audience. The special effects are phenomenal; the detail given to every alien character is outstanding, so much so that the realness of it can easily gross one out. The screening I went to was in 3D and I can say that the 3D is pretty good; the shots taken off the ledge of New York City’s Chrysler building made me a bit dizzy. The film does a good job at encompassing its predecessors without making a person unfamiliar with them feel lost. This is definitely a family film to watch during Memorial Day Weekend.

 

In this chapter of the Men in Black, Agent J (Will Smith) is forced to travel to the early years of the agency in 1969, to prevent an alien known as Boris the Animal (Jermaine Clement) from killing his partner K (Tommy Lee Jones) and at the same time saving the world from a future invasion and destruction. Agent J has 24 hours to prevent history from changing; he gets to meet and deal with the younger version of Agent K (Josh Brolin), and also discovers other secrets about the agency.

 

There are many cameos in the film, but some of the most talked about such as Lady Gaga or Justin Bieber are barely noticeable. Although Smith still has the same smart mouth as in the past two films, here he’s lost his childish comedy, which means a lot of funny moments the others delivered have been lost. The emotional ties are stronger than the comedy, which perhaps won’t work much for its target audience as the film begins to feel a bit long, the beginning of the film is too fast paced and then it seems to go in slow motion for a while.  

 

The best part about time traveling were the incorporations of Coney Island during the 60’s and Bill Hader as Andy Warhol, there’s many clever historic references here. As mentioned above the special effects were worth the $215 million dollars spent in making the film. We can see this on Boris The Animal, the villain’s presence and voice are perfectly horrific. My favorite character was young Agent K; Brolin is a flawless impersonator and he picked up the mannerisms and everything else from the older version of his character as if they were his own.

 

PG-13 is a perfect rating for this film, as it might get too convoluted and fast paced for a younger audience anyway. As a sequel this film adds on to the story and doesn’t damage it in any way, which very few sequels manage to do. Since there’s consideration of perhaps a ‘Men in Black 4’, which is not a surprise seeing that there’s still plenty of material to work from, other actors should be considered since both of the main charters seemed a bit tired in their roles. This will be a fun film for parents who enjoyed the past films and teens that might be enjoying their first ‘Men in Black’ adventure.

Karen Posada

By

2012/05/14 at 12:00am

Battleship

05.14.2012 | By |

Battleship

‘Battleship’ is based on the Hasbro naval combat game, so not much is expected of it but lots of mindless explosions and shooting. The film fulfills exactly that expectation, because besides the amazing special effects there’s nothing else nutritious in it. This navy propaganda movie has an extremely weak storyline, encompassing dialogue and comedy that are merely attached to try to make the film function as a whole. This movie continues the alien movie lineup to be seen this summer, I’m quite sure this will be the worst one of them all.

 

The Storyline revolves around Alex Hooper (Taylor Kitsch), who is basically a screw up and doesn’t have many goals for himself. His older brother Stone (Alexander Skarsgård) is the complete opposite and enrolls him in the navy. After what seems a couple of years later, Alex becomes a lieutenant and during a Naval war games exercise in Hawaii his crew, which includes R&B singer Rihanna, get involved in an extraterrestrial sea battle for the Earth’s survival.

 

The movie wastes a lot of time building a back-story, made up of romance and the brothers bonding along with an enormous amount of Navy propaganda. All pretty unnecessary and somewhat boring, that whole first 30 minutes or so could have been reduced to a five minute clip. The most outstanding thing in this movie are the spaceships, they are so real and detailed and the explosions and action they deliver are the best things this movie offers. The Halo like outfitted aliens are somewhat original and more real than most, but despite the obvious fact that they are more technologically advanced than us there’s not a lot of intelligent actions on their part.    

 

Liam Neeson once more signs up to be used as an advertisement tool by a mediocre film, given the fact that if you put all the scenes he’s in total, we only see him for about ten minutes. I actually wasn’t too annoyed by Rihanna, since most people such as myself have already judged the movie by her being in it; she played a tough chick without her usual eroticism in her music videos and just followed orders, her lines like the rest of the script are just flat; so not much acting was used. Kitsch and Decker are just eye candy, because nothing really intelligent comes out of their mouths. Another interesting scheme used to persuade the public into cheering for the movie is an appearance by a President of the United States, if this isn’t the biggest most annoying use of propaganda, I don’t know what is. The movie screams patriotism in a cheesy, in your face, “be a hero and sacrifice your life for your country” kind of way.

 

The storyline is so weak that it seems to contradict itself towards the end and there’s never a clear reason as to what the aliens are doing in our planet. It’s just an all out war and a whole lot of shooting without an explanation behind it. What’s worst is there’s a scene at the end of the credits that alludes to a second part. If you enjoy action for the sake of it and don’t care about anything else that makes up a movie, then you can enjoy this. Otherwise, I say wait for the rest of the alien invasion arriving this summer 2012 in theaters.    

Karen Posada

By

2012/05/09 at 12:00am

Dark Shadows

05.9.2012 | By |

Dark Shadows

Anyone would say that director Tim Burton has decided to jump on the vampire bandwagon, as he decided to take ‘Dark Shadows’ a popular gothic soap opera from the 60’s and make it into a movie; an idea that might bleed into a couple of extra projects under the same theme. Burton of course made this his own, using a vibrant darkness aka his signature style all throughout it. There’s no denying that he’s a master of his art and that can be seen in the beautiful sceneries, costumes, make up, and even special effects. Thanks to Burton’s talent as well as strong acting the semi hollow storyline and the silly romance don’t manage to ruin the movie.

 

The film is set in Maine, it begins with the Collins family history from 1750 when they left Liverpool to settle in the New World, to make and spread their wealth. All goes awry for this successful family when a witch, Angelique Bouchard (Eva Green) becomes infatuated with young Barnabas Collins (Johnny Depp). Unfortunately, Barnabas falls in love with Josette DuPres (Bella Heathcote); vengeful the witch curses the family and anything they touch. Her worst offense is turning Barnabas into a vampire and locking him away as punishment. He’s freed from his imprisonment almost two decades later in 1972; where he surfaces to find that although his family name still lives on, it has fallen into ruins. He joins his remaining descendants: Elizabeth (Michelle Pfeiffer), Roger (Jonny Lee Miller), Carolyn (Chloe Grace Moretz) and David (Gully McGrath) who’ve hired a live-in psychiatrist, Dr. Julia Hoffman (Helena Bonham Carter). Together Barnabas hopes to bring his family name back to its former glory.

 

The first thought after seeing a picture of this whole cast together in costume was, “here’s a quirkier version of the Addams Family”, and they are not far from it. The film encompasses the TV series it is based on well as it took its formulaic elements: the paranormal, including vampires, witches, ghosts, werewolves, and even time travel.  It’s clever to put a wealthy proper man turned vampire from the 1700’s to explore a life during the 1970’s, one of the most peculiar times in history. There’s some chuckles along the way, plenty of references to stuff from the 70’s, jokes full of double meaning, sexual tension and an interesting yet unmoving cameo by Alice Cooper. There’s things that threaten to harm the gothic coolness of this movie, such as a childish love story, a “sexy” hormone charged teenager, a storyline that doesn’t seem to follow a clear pattern, ending with a culminating yet easy solution that’s somewhat anti-climatic and desperately dramatic. I will blame most of the corniness of the film on the fact that this is based on a soap opera.

 

Depp has satisfied many fans dreams by playing a vampire and he does it masterfully, this being his eight collaboration with Burton, it’s easy to see how comfortable and natural they are together. Green was fantastic at being evil, sexy and powerful all at once. Pfeiffer delivers a balance between the odd and the normal, and although her acting is strong at times it merely feels like she’s delivering lines. Bonham Carter, Burton’s partner and one of his favorites, plays a similar role to those in most of his movies.

 

Some of the jokes are a little forced and the previews have given away too many of them, some also seem to want to satisfy the PG-13 audience. On the other hand, there’s scenes that are taken too far and although I know Burton is a master of the macabre, my least favorite is Depp slapping a woman more than once, no matter how evil she is I was uncomfortable viewing it.  

 

It’s understandable that trying to bring a beloved gothic soap opera, which lasted for about 5 years, to the big screen is a challenge. If the project is developed on to make a couple of extra chapters, this could help fill in some of the holes in the story such as the vampire’s “new” love interest background as there are still some questions. The humor although at times silly, helped the story move along and perhaps I’m missing some things since I never saw the soap opera. I was able to over look the flaws of the film being distracted by what Burton does best, which is use his darkness to create a mysterious, elegant, beautiful and attractive film. I also enjoyed seeing Depp as a vampire; he was charming and naively funny. This duo hasn’t managed to achieve the greatness they have before in the last couple of their films together, and this one can be added to that list; but yet this is still a fun enough movie to watch with your older kids.   

Jack Rico

By

2012/05/04 at 12:00am

The Avengers

05.4.2012 | By |

The Avengers
Jack Rico

By

2012/05/03 at 12:00am

Select a Page