Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

The Latest in ShowBiz News

Namreta Kumar

By

2010/06/15 at 12:00am

My Sneak Peak at Pixar Studios

06.15.2010 | By |

My Sneak Peak at Pixar Studios

As a member of the press you may attend many press junkets over the course of your career. Some you will remember because the film was good, others because the staff was rude; your first just because it was your first. However if your first happens to be at Pixar you will be hard pressed to find a better experience; Pixar Animation Studios is simply unforgettable.

Late Thursday afternoon I got a voicemail from Jack proclaiming an exceptional opportunity has presented itself and he would like for me to get back to him as soon as possible. Now just so you all know I am not much for the leash that is a smart-phone, so we continued to play phone tag into the late hours of the night. Eventually I received an email that went something like this:

 

“Hey Namreta,

ShowBizCafe was offered to go to San Francisco to do the junket with the stars. I’d love for you to be able to experience something this cool at the Pixar Studios. It’s this Saturday.

Thanks.”

At this point I was just ecstatic to go see Toy Story, San Francisco was just going to be icing on the cake. Boy, was I wrong. Watching Toy Story 3 was just the tip of the iceberg.

As we pull up to Pixar Animation Studios for the first time, I begin to realize that Jack just gave me the opportunity of a lifetime, newbie or veteran. It is around six-thirty pm as we all walk toward the front entrance. Outside is a huge replica of the iconic Pixar desk spotlight, Luxo, and the classic toy ball, at the door is the Sunnyside Daycare Welcome sign we are all going to soon add to our repertoire.

As we walk into this warehouse turned studio/office of modern filmmaking at its best there stands a monument of Pixar’s perfection: a life size replica of Ken’s Dollhouse with every detail intact, even a working elevator. We all sign in to our right. Behind the sign-in desk is a case of all the well-deserved awards Pixar has amassed, down to what looks like the Piston Cup itself.

The first night at Pixar we are already being treated to a very special screening in their very own screening room. Being from the New York City area, all the screening rooms I am accustomed to come through floors of elevators to the renovated side of a building. They are spectacular experiences to be had, but they are not The Pixar Screening Room:

We all file into a traditional theatre, red velvet on oak paneled seats with a beautiful curtain to cover the screen. As the house lights turn off, the constellations above reveal themselves. Yes I said constellations, Pixar has re-created stars for the ceiling of the screening room. Complete with shooting stars, Orion’s Belt, The Big Dipper etc. And the film starts with the classic short, another success in Pixar’s case. As Toy Story 3’s credits come to a close I am still glued to my seat. The desk lamp jumps across the screen for the last shot and its beam of light brings on the house lights.

And so at this late hour I still find myself wide-awake, and I am working on NY time. We step outside and realize our sneaking suspicion of the desk lamp outside being turned on for passersby(s) of night is true. The outdoors picnic tables of the entrance are lit by non-other than Luxo.

The following afternoon we return to the site for lunch and our third treat: A tour of The Pixar Animation Studios! More than a tour it is an intimate look at the studios and the movie-making process. Much like the movies themselves the studios are built entirely by Pixar, every last detail. Steve Jobs policy is just that and every screw in the studio has been hand turned to make the studio as much a home as Pixar’s family.

That is the first fact our tour guide pervades us with as we walk through the skylight atrium towards Pixar’s very own café. Even though the food there is good the average employee diet consists mostly of cereal, any and every kind of cereal you can imagine. The places I have worked have had coffee bars and health bars, but Pixar’s kitchens (they have a few spread out through the floors) have cereal bars that the employee’s love to indulge in. If you are worried that too much cereal isn’t going to be healthy (enough) don’t worry they have bicycles that go from building to building for meetings, when they actually have to stop working because we know they never want to, and they have yoga classes for staff in the atrium. But enough about employee perks, how and where the magic happens: In one sentence, it is approximately a four-year process, one and half for story and the following for development.

Screenwriters rejoice, Pixar is a proponent of excellent story-telling due to massive amounts of research, attention to detail, outlining, and constant story boarding. We begin our tour here, with the storyboards that line the upstairs corner in the far left of the studios. On display today are the much-edited original storyboards of “Finding Nemo,” specifically when the shark swallows Marlin and Dory. Just so we are all on the same page, I say much edited because it is almost like looking at an outline of a storyboard. As each character is developed and each plot line explored the whole staff strips each and every possible world before handing over this completed leg of Pixar magic. The story is airtight because this work, much like the next steps, has its in house critics and critiques.

From here we walk along the corridor to the upstairs front left corner. Along the wall are frames of step-by-step artwork that is rotated throughout the year to showcase Pixar’s talent hobbies and talent. In this very corner we begin to discuss the one question that is on all our minds: How can I have your job at Pixar? The straight and narrow is this Pixar is a family. To work for Pixar is not a project-by-project resume building experience. So with a little perseverance and good timing you can fit the mold of the next employee, just remember to reapply on the website approximately every six months, and when you get the first call for an interview remember there can possibly be thirty-eight more to go. Yes we spoke with an engineer who got her job after thirty-nine interviews; of course she would go through them again considering the development of every strand of Violet’s hair is more than worth it.

Which brings us to the point of the tour when we cross the bridge to the right side of the upstairs studio and meet one of the Art Directors. Across the wall is a very colorful storyboard of Toy Story 3 (at least all the major points). Here we learn in great detail, how much detail is in every scene. For those of us who are not almost OCD, as I am, about color schemes and detailed palettes let me be the first to tell you that they can totally change the way you appreciate any Pixar movie, especially after you get a look at this wall. What is highlighted here is how color affects the viewer. So as not to give anything form the film away (mostly because I liked it and I don’t want to ruin it for anyone), let me just says this, the color of Andy’s clothes are not accidental, the serene lighting on Bonnie is supposed to make you think of her pure and innocent character, the eerie unsaturated grey’s are supposed to make you apprehensive, and as red always is it is a sign of danger. But Art Direction is not just color it is about the entire setting and much like Pixar is a family project, we learned that the paintings of all our favorite characters in Toy Story were drawn by non-other than Lee Unkrich’s children.

And so from the detailed model’s and another line up of highly organized artwork we are led back to the far right corner of the upstairs, from where we head to the very special software animation room. This room is perhaps one of the best parts of the tour, as they say save the best for last. So imagine a home theatre system, a relatively smaller room than screening rooms, with couches that rise to the back so everyone has the perfect view and comfort. In the center of the room is a set up of computers and engineering software. This is where every frame’s every detail is examined and cross-examined.

What I was privileged enough to see as an example was how Woody was updated to match the modern day animation engineering. Toy Story was the first computer animated film of it’s kind, but ten years later that original computer cannot stand up to its new competition so Woody was masterfully recreated from scratch. As we were told numerous times on our tour, think of each element, especially the characters, as software programs. When writing these programs there are a million different options, so how does Pixar know what to chose and where to draw the line. Simple, once a character is simulated everyone gets together, in groups, and they sift through acceptable changes and unacceptable changes.

As with everything Pixar, all of this work is done in house. So as everyone thanks Pixar for a great show and readies themselves for the interviews with the stars I take a moment to digest this surreal moment before the next.

Jack Rico

By

2010/06/09 at 12:00am

Is a new ‘Mortal Kombat’ movie on its way?

06.9.2010 | By |

Is a new 'Mortal Kombat' movie on its way?

Just in case you have not seen the new YouTube video of the new Mortal Kombat short, it is time you do. From what we know, WB has hired Kevin Tancharoen, the 25 year old director of the remake of ‘Fame’ to put together this well produced gaming film as a test for executives and the sorts.

Will it work? That is still to be seen, but from the looks of it, it has my blessing. It puts to shame the two previous incarnations that were just horrible and outdated now. LatinoReview broke the video online.

The actors that conform the cast are Michael Jai White who played Jacks, Jeri Ryan as Sonya Blade, Lateef Crowder as Baraka, Ian Anthony Dale as Scorpion and Matt Mullins as Johnny Cage. There’s a few missing, but what the hell, it’s a test.

Enjoy and here is to the WB making a smart decision and bringing this bitch to the screen!

Jack Rico

By

2010/06/08 at 12:00am

Shutter Island

06.8.2010 | By |

Rating: 4.0

Rated: Not available.
Release Date: 2010-02-19
Starring: Laeta Kalogridis
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://www.shutterisland.com/

 Go to our film page

The new psychological thriller, “Shutter Island,” based on the popular novel by Dennis Lehane, comes from the dexterous and practiced hands of legendary director Martin Scorsese. The film is deluged with a plethora of twists and turns, brilliant acting by Leonardo DiCaprio and jarring scenes of suspense created and framed to perfection by its helmer. You should be excited to see this film… the entertainment value is high and the production quality is of the highest caliber. It’s definitely a must see movie!

For those of you who unfamiliar with the plotline, we’ll reveal only a succinct version.  The film adaptation tells the tale of two U.S. marshals, Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo), who are summoned to a remote and barren island off the cost of Massachusetts to investigate the mysterious disappearance of a prisoner from the island’s fortress-like mental ward. Not much can else be revealed because anything more can ruin the movie experience.

One thing you will take away from this movie is Scorsese’s prowess in the visual department. Some of the camera shots seen make you wish the projectionist could pause them and play it over and over again. After seeing all of DiCaprio’s films, Shutter Island, in my humble opinion, is perhaps one of the top 3 best performances of his career (What’s Eating Gilbert Grape, Shutter Island and Basketball Diaries, in order). That is what you await at your local theater this weekend.
 
A major subtext in the movie’s theme is a question asked by all of us, at one point or another in our lives: Am I mad, or is the world around me mad? What’s real and what is not? (I’ve been there before). Just like Hitchcock, the story is constantly deviating us from our path of clarity, creating scenes that don’t really exist and submerging us into a nightmare we can’t manage to wake up from.

At first, the film seems to be just another intriguing noir detective story but it is so much more than that. The references and homages in the film are multiple, everything from “Out of the Past” to “Shock Corridor” and “The Snake Pit” to Hitchcock’s “Spellbound.”

“Shutter Island” is a world where nothing is what it appears to be. It’s suspenseful, mysterious, ambiguous and insane. Now that sounds like a fun movie!

Jack Rico

By

2010/06/08 at 12:00am

From Paris with Love

06.8.2010 | By |

Rating: 3.0

Rated: R for strong bloody violence throughout, drug content, pervasive language and brief sexuality.
Release Date: 2010-02-05
Starring: Adi Hasak
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: Not available

 Go to our film page

When it comes to action movies ‘From Paris With Love’ delivers. It’s not the best action film since Wanted, but it did do a good job of extracting a few ‘ooooohs’ and ‘aaaaahs’ from me. I must confess that according to the trailer, the film looked worse to me than what it was. Perhaps this is why I think better of the film, because I was expecting pure detritus. What you need to know is that John Travolta – though he might look a tad silly, one gets over it quickly – is once again intense, amusing and entertaining. Johnathan Rhys Meyers looks like an amateur actor and disappoints tremendously all the while french director Pierre Morel (Taken) is the new John Woo! When people talk about action directors such as Guy Ritchie, Woo and Luc Besson, Morel has to now be a part of the conversation.

The storyline has some interesting twists and turns, enough to dial you in. While in Paris, a young employee (Johnathan Rhys Meyers) in the office of the US Ambassador hooks up with an American spy (John Travolta) looking to stop a terrorist attack in the City of Lights.

This is the type of film you go to when you had a stressful week at work or at home and feel like seeing someone splatter some person’s brain on the wall with a semiautomatic silencer. Definitely a stress reliever.

Pau Brunet

By

2010/06/07 at 12:00am

Monday Box Office: ‘Shrek 4’, three’s a charm

06.7.2010 | By |

Monday Box Office: 'Shrek 4', three's a charm

This week come to the screen four strong releases but none with options to reach the first position, a position he has held comfortably Shrek Forever After. In the third week introduced the lowest down top10, 41%, and totals $ 25M and a total of $ 183M. The film has surprised this week to present a slight decrease just as a kind of negative weekend in general. This track has been negative for the other two options segment, Prince of Persia and Marmaduke. Now Shrek has just enough time to take advantage of the stretch, because in some great competitor will Toy Story 3. Word of mouth from the Dreamworks movie not made of steel and therefore it is easy to think that will be very weak before the Disney film.

On their own, Prince of Persia falls more than expected, 53% to $ 13.9 M and even below the 60M in the U.S., while Marmaduke has raised only $ 11.3 M despite leaving with more than 3,200 cinemas . The film has lacked some bad data matching The spy next door or Furry Vengeance. The promotion was colorful but not spectacular and this may translate into a little hold up the $ 25-27M.

Of the premieres this week, more strongly shining were the two comedies, Get him to the Greek and Killers, and both are what have been the best results. The first complies with the long awaited, $ 17.4 M in 2.697 theaters with an average of $ 6.400, the second is placed in the $ 16.1 M, slightly higher than previously thought and much better than expected with Friday’s data . With 2.859 copies, his average is placed in a room right $ 5,600.

Get him to the Greek achieves a success because it has been successful to be a decent offer from sector 20 to 35 years pro-comedies like thugs as Role Models or Forgetting Sarah Marshall. The film of “colleagues” did not have much competition in this bulletin and this has become strong, based on a correct positive review. On their own, Killers has positioned itself as clearly feminine and comedy for all ages, but with a radically different aroma Sex and the city 2. The Lionsgate film is raised as an option similar to Date Night, and sought the memory of his previous films lead actress, Katherine Heigl, The Ugly truth and 27 dresses.

The comedy star last week, Sex and the city in February, has fallen hard as expected. What makes an exaggerated 60% to $ 12.6 M and puts his total at $ 73m, 26 less than the previous film by now. Warner is unlikely to repeat the success of the previous movie, concerned by a terrible word of mouth and fierce competition. The film arouses the interest deducted from their followers and this suggests that jumps to $ 100M but little further.

The fourth release of the week has been the ill-fated Splice, independently of gender production fully dimensioned by Warner. The tape came out with 2.450 cinemas and surrounded by a positive review of some enthusiasm from the most fan of the genre. After its limited release on Friday, the upside is that does not sink during the Saturday, probably indicating an interesting response from the adult sector concerned by the proposal. Now the question is in the pull of recommendation, the element which should keep alive.

# TITULO Recaudación Descenso # Salas Prom/Salas Acmdo.
1 Shrek Forever After 25M$ -41% 4.386 $5.760 183M$
2 Get Him to the Greek
17,4M$

2.696 $6.400 17,4M$
3 Killers
16,1M$ 2.859 $5.300 16,1M$
4 Prince of Persia 13,9M$ -53% 3.646 $4.168 59,5M$
5 Sex and the City 2 12,6M$ -60% 3.445 $3.775 73,4M$
Jack Rico

By

2010/06/06 at 12:00am

‘Sex and the City 3’: A Trilogy or a Tragedy?

06.6.2010 | By |

'Sex and the City 3': A Trilogy or a Tragedy?

Sex and the City’ has been nothing short of a phenomenon.  From the onset, the series, the girls and the city they lived in was an immediate hit, drawing millions of viewers to HBO, later TBS and now the Box Office. The draw is one that is still strong today 12 years later.  Proof of this can be seen on Perry Street in the West Village, where one is almost guaranteed to see fans, mostly young and middle aged women, posing in front of a chained-off townhouse with a sign reading “NO TRESPASSING”.

After some deconstruction of the phenomenon,  I believe it really boils down to 3 things: fabulousity, nostalgia and hope.

You can say whatever you want about the recent movie ‘Sex and the City 2’ … but one thing is for sure is that the power of the brand remains strong.  

So strong that I agree with Sarah Jessica that they should complete the trilogy with a third and final run.

My advice to her though is to remember the three things that made you.
1- Fabulousity. We want fabulousity but we want it to feel real. Abu Dhabi was fun, but in hindsight the Hamptons may have been more authentic.  
2- Nostalgia.  Tap into this powerful emotion, but do it remembering to be relevant today.  Why did we relate? who did we relate to? But keep it real. Don’t go over the top with the characters and don’t forget the times.
3- Hope. Here you have been nailing it.  At the end of the day, whatever twists and turns life puts in front of Carrie and her posse… they survive and thrive, holding their cosmos in bejeweled hands.

So here is to the final ‘Sex and the City 3.’  One with “NO TRESPASSING”.

Carrie Bradshaw's 'Apartment'

Karen Posada

By

2010/06/04 at 12:00am

Killers

06.4.2010 | By |

Killers

First thought: What the heck did I just watch? This movie has a multiple personality disorder, it doesn’t know if it wants to be a romantic-comedy or an action/adventure film. It tries to be well rounded by attempting to fulfill all these genres but it fails terribly.

The story is about Jen (Katherine Heigl) and Spencer (Ashton Kutcher). They meet in Nice, France, the beautiful French Riviera gives birth to their romance. Jen is on vacation with her parents Mr. & Mrs. Kornfeldt (Tom Selleck & Catherine O’Hara) who are extremely quirky; the dad is a control freak and the mom is drunk all the time. Spencer being a professional assassin is there on a mission. They have a cheesy first date where we are supposed to believe there are sparks, because Spencer quits his secret life to settle down and live the normal suburban life he’s dreamed of with Jen. 3 years down the line Jen abruptly finds out about Spencer’s secret life and they become fugitives running for their lives. In this journey they find out their lives and friends were not what they thought them to be and it comes to an awkward and sudden end.

If you dreamed of ever seeing Kutcher speaking French and being shirtless at the same time, your dream has come true. Kutcher carries the movie on his shoulders, which is not necessarily a good thing. I was surprised to actually like him in the action scenes, that’s to say the least of his acting skills though. Heigl’s character could not get any more annoying, she’s a spoiled rich girl that whines for most of the movie.

This movie simply isn’t entertaining enough to make it worth your while, it has very few funny moments and the only good scenes are the ones where there are fights. Not even the dark humor helps it and although they try hard to keep us in suspense the predictability is what over kills it.

Jack Rico

By

2010/06/04 at 12:00am

Splice

06.4.2010 | By |

Splice

‘Splice,’ is in this critic’s opinion, one of the worst, if not arguably the worst movie of 2010. There are so many wrong things with it on so many levels I don’t even know where to begin. Actually, I do know where to begin. Let’s start with the plotline that Warner Bros. has up on their press website for the film:

Superstar genetic engineers Clive (Adrien Brody) and Elsa (Sarah Polley) specialize in splicing DNA from different animals to create incredible new hybrids. Now they want to use human DNA in a hybrid that could revolutionize science and medicine. But when the pharmaceutical company that funds their research forbids it, Clive and Elsa secretly take their boldest experimentation underground — risking their careers by pushing the boundaries of science to serve their own curiosity and ambition. The result is Dren, an amazing, strangely beautiful creature of uncommon intelligence and an array of unexpected physical developments. At first, Dren (spelled ‘NERD’ backwards, wink, wink). exceeds their wildest dreams. But as she grows and learns at an accelerated rate, her existence threatens to become their worst nightmare.

The story sounds compelling and gripping, piquing ones interest of the outcome. Regrettably, when you finish experiencing this disjointed effort, the results are baffling and incomprehensible. There are numerous leaps of logic – instances when the protagonists act in a fashion that only characters in a comedy would. It’s as if the screenwriters wanted to hammer home how idiotic these scientists really are. Ultimately, our heroes actions in the second act are aberrations of consistent implausibilities.

The character of Elsa played by Sarah Polley is a vexing figure who is pigheaded, ambitious and arrogant. She’s not a likable character, you don’t root for her but rather against her. Her behavior towards volatile situations and tense moments are obtuse and supercilious. Brody on the other hand is cautious, correct in his ways, but eventually turns out to be a milksop of a man who lets his unstable woman take charge of critical situations and of his morals. The movie finally collapses when several Freudian occurrences transpire without any rhyme or reason. I can only describe them as some of the most preposterous, unlikely and outrageous twists I have seen in movies (‘Orphan’ by Spaniard director Jaume Collet-Serra comes a close second).

The fright horror we were putatively in for was diminished to only special effects editing and dimwitted risible scenes of absurdity, nothing more. Not once was I scared (unlike The Strangers or The House of The Devil recently). I kept placing my hands on my face, but in disbelief for the inanity unfolding before my very eyes. The trailer is partly the culprit. It misleads us into expecting a flat out terror film full of suspense building sequences matched with high-intense graphics. Rather, it delivers a science fiction drama of the likes of Species, to be exact. Horror is only a secondary thought here.

Guillermo Del Toro served as a producer and did a descent job in creating Dren and most of the special effects with the budgets he was provided. Director Vincenzo Natali shot a beautifully dark and mysterious production that is visually appealing, but the payoff is painful not only to the viewing experience but to the pocket as well. If you can, stay away from this film, unless you want to see how bad it is. That sometimes happens to me too.

Jack Rico

By

2010/06/04 at 12:00am

Get Him to the Greek

06.4.2010 | By |

Get Him to the Greek

Get Him To The Greek’ is perhaps the best comedy of the year… so far. It’s competition in 2010 doesn’t match up against it – MacGruber, Hot Tub Time Machine, Cop Out.  Even last year’s ‘Forgetting Sarah Marshall.’ is not as good. ‘Greek’ has much more likable and interesting characters and a mix of clever and low brow humor to titillate the senses. Also, the music industry is much more appealing and much more fun than the aforementioned flick.

‘Greek’ has nothing to do with mythology, but instead with a record company assistant (Jonah Hill) who is hired to accompany an out-of-control British rock star, Aldous Snow (Russell Brand), to his 10th anniversary concert at L.A.’s Greek Theater.

I’m not a big fan of British comedian Russell Brand due to the vexing complexity he is. But there is a side to him I like, I just don’t know if it is an act. The first bag of exasperating tricks he bundles is his uncontrollable zest for being annoying (I saw an interview with him on Craig Ferguson, hated him), an accent that doesn’t allow you to understand anything he says and I feel he has no charm on the mike (thought his hosting duties at an MTV Video Music Awards show was pretty lame). So why then did I like him in his first full length feature? Unbelievably, he stops being a bane nuisance and becomes contagiously eloquent with a marvelous rhetoric that can pounce any argument. So which one is he really? I like the Aldous Snow character much better and less the real Brand. But if he continues to create work that resembles Aldous’ nuances, logic and verbiage and dramatic layers, I’ll seriously consider becoming a fan. For now, I’m a swing voter. His character Aldous Snow, a caustic British musician, had his first appearance in ‘Forgetting Sarah Marshall.’ He was actually one of the highlights of that film along with Paul Rudd. I thoroughly enjoy his film performances.

Jonah Hill on his part, plays the innocent and impressionable Aaron Green, who is a fan of Aldous. I’ve also never been a fan of Hill, I just don’t think these guys are good actors. But again, Hill’s character surprised me. He nailed the personality of what guys trying to make it in the music industry are like and the humiliations they sometimes have to go through to get there. I worked in radio and MTV for several years and these execs really get a joy in making you suffer. This movie’s comedy relies on those moments that are very funny here in ‘Greek’.

There is this one funny scene in the limo where Hill is taking Brand to the Today Show. It’s perhaps the funniest piece in the film along with the ‘Jeffrey’ moment. You must watch out for them.

P. Diddy is good, but he’s no actor and makes Hill and Brand look like Academy Award winners. He is not as good as other critics and bloggers say he is. He has some good lines, but they could’ve been magic in the hands of a more experienced actor like Michael Shannon in ‘The Runaways’ (he was brilliant in that film).

Judd Apatow and Jason Segel are the producers of ‘Greek’ and did a damn good job. The director Nicholas Stoller created some snappy and attractive shots that I’m sure you’ll guys enjoy whole heartedly. I didn’t necessarily laugh in every single scene, but I must confess I had fun seeing all the tomfoolery unfold on this poor kid Aaron (Hill). The pop-rock soundtrack was infectious and catchy and I entertained myself, which is the point of going to the movies. I recommend you spend your flow and go with your friends. If you don’t like Brand or Hill, you’ll like them after you see this movie. Good times!

Jack Rico

By

2010/06/03 at 12:00am

Marmaduke

06.3.2010 | By |

Marmaduke

When I was a kid I used to watch ‘Marmaduke’ on Saturday morning cartoons. This film adaptation is not as entertaining as the former, but nevertheless kids should have a frolicking time with it. Marmaduke is not meant to entertain adults, it’s for children who are 7-10 years old or even tweens at 12-14. So any grown men and women who go to see this film need to understand that the gags and dance moves from these dogs are meant for infants. If you enjoy kids movies, more power to you.

The plot. A suburban family moves to a new neighborhood with their large yet lovable Great Dane, who has a tendency to wreak havoc in his own oblivious way.

This is one of those few cat and dog movies where humans take a back seat to them. I would say it is 80% animals 20% humans. There is hardly any acting from real people in this film, which is why you can’t really knock the acting because there barely is any. Most of the work comes from the voices of Owen Wilson, Emma Stone, George Lopez and Kiefer Sutherland. I thought Owen fit the personality of the star dog perfectly. Lopez I think is always hilarious with the stereotypical Mexican accent as Marmaduke’s cat friend.

The situational comedy in the movie is modestly fun and you can tell director Tom Dey (“Failure to Launch”) makes something of an effort to make it likable. Overall, Marmaduke is what it is – a project using a familiar American brand name to make some money from it. Did it work? Not enough for me to tell you to run to the theater to see it. This is definitely a DVD property.

Select a Page