Please enable javascript to view this site.

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

The Latest in ShowBiz News

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/22 at 12:00am

Sex and the City: The Movie will have a part 2

09.22.2008 | By |

Sex and the City: The Movie will have a part 2

Where to celebrate the launch of the Sex and the City: The Movie DVD?

Why, the same place where, in the film, Carrie Bradshaw gets stood up at the altar. Thursday night, the film’s stars Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Cattrall and Cynthia Nixon reconvened at the New York Public Library, which was lit up in pink and decorated with a custom-made interlocking-C white Chanel couch.

A radiant and friendly Parker, in Alexander McQueen, said she was ecstatic that her film was one of the year’s blockbusters. “I was surprised and thrilled and gratified and shocked,” said Parker. “I think we felt very honored that people connected to the story.”

Said Cattrall: “This has been an amazing year. It’s poignant that the year after we started shooting, the DVD is coming out. It just seems to get better.”

And now, word is, there’s a sequel in the works.

“I guess there’s been a lot of talk except that Michael Patrick and I haven’t spoken,” said Parker, referring to the film’s writer and director Michael Patrick King. “We’re going to have a conversation sooner rather than later. If Michael feels there’s a story worthy of an audience leaving their home and plunking down a significant amount of money for a ticket, then I assume we’ll move forward. We feel very indebted to this audience and it would be a disservice to them to make a movie because we can.”

If a second installment of Sex comes to fruition, Parker wants it to “be thoughtful and something that has some meaning — (we want) to tell a good story and produce it well.”

Cattrall too hopes it happens. “The deal is they’re making the deal and Michael Patrick King is writing the script. I don’t envy him that task. I’m very excited because Samantha is single and that’s real fun to play,” she said.

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/22 at 12:00am

‘Lakeview Terrace’ is #1 at the box office

09.22.2008 | By |

'Lakeview Terrace' is #1 at the box office

“Lakeview Terrace” (Sony/Screen Gems), the new thriller starring Samuel L. Jackson as a policeman terrorizing his new neighbors, Patrick Wilson and Kerry Washington, earned $15.6 million, ousting the Coen brothers’ “Burn After Reading” from first place at the box office over the weekend, according to estimates from Media by Numbers, a box office tracking firm. “Burn After Reading” (Focus Features), starring George Clooney and Brad Pitt, slipped to second place with earnings of $11.3 million. It has made $36.4 million in two weeks. New releases grabbed third and fourth positions: “My Best Friend’s Girl” (LionsGate), the romantic comedy starring Kate Hudson, Dane Cook and Jason Biggs, earned $8.3 million and the animated comedy “Igor” (MGM) was close behind with $8 million. “Righteous Kill” (Overture Films), the action film starring Al Pacino and Robert De Niro, took fifth place with $7.7 million for the weekend and $28.8 million in two weeks. Over all the weekend was relatively weak with revenues of $93 million, 4 percent lower than the same weekend last year.

The Box-Office Top Five

#1 “Lakeview Terrace” ($15.6 million)
#2 “Burn After Reading” ($11.3 million)
#3 “My Best Friend’s Girl” ($8.3 million)
#4 “Igor” ($8 million)
#5 “Righteous Kill” ($7.7 million)

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/19 at 12:00am

Ghost Town

09.19.2008 | By |

Rated: PG-13 for for some strong language, sexual humor and drug references.
Release Date: 2008-09-19
Starring: David Koepp, John Kamps
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://www.ghosttownmovie.com/

Go to our film page

Ghost Town

Ghost Town is one of those romantic comedies that never quite clicks. At times, its humor is effective, provoking chuckles and laughs. At other times, the comedy feels forced and awkward. The romantic element is equally hit-and-miss. The chemistry that emerges between the leads during the film’s second half is largely absent from the first 45 minutes. And the premise, rich with promise and pregnant with possibilities, is reduced to a plot device that allows Ghost Town to turn into a low-rent, modern-day version of A Christmas Carol.

The movie’s opening scene is a winner, with philanderer Frank Herlihy (Greg Kinnear) having a phone conversation with his wife, Gwen (Téa Leoni), who has just discovered he’s having an affair. Frank wraps up the call just as the curtain falls on his time on Earth. Director David Koepp orchestrates his end brilliantly, with a sleight-of-hand that is both funny and surprising. However, instead of making his way to the next life, Frank finds himself stuck in Manhattan as a ghost. He can see and hear everything, but is invisible and unable to do more than observe. Enter Bertram Pincus, D.D.S. (Ricky Gervais), the most unpleasant dentist in the city.

Ghost Town’s comedy is maddeningly inconsistent. Masterful sequences such as the opening one in which Frank meets his demise are interspersed with episodes that not only don’t work on a comedic level, but run on for too long. Consider, for example, an interchange between Bertram and his doctor (played by Kristen Wiig) in which both continuously interrupt each other. Like a bad, unfunny segment of Saturday Night Live, this drags on seemingly without end, becoming increasingly frustrating with every new interruption. Comedy is supposed to be funny, not annoying.

Those who take a glass half-full approach to Ghost Town will probably enjoy it the most. There is romance, there is comedy, and there is a feel-good ending. For some, those things will be enough, and the fact that they’re not as well developed or effectively nurtured as they might be will not be a significant detraction. Ultimately, however, the movie cries out for an offbeat approach such as the one Marc Forster utilized in Stranger than Fiction. Ghost Town’s unwillingness to escape from a safe orbit keeps the movie trapped in mediocrity.

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/19 at 12:00am

Lakeview Terrace

09.19.2008 | By |

Rated: PG-13 for intense thematic material, violence, sexuality, language and some drug references.
Release Date: 2008-09-19
Starring: David Loughery, Howard Korder
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/lakeviewterrace/

Go to our film page

Lakeview Terrace

Lakeview Terrace is the latest thriller from Neil LaBute. LaBute began his filmmaking career with the scathing In the Company of Men, but his previous effort was the deservedly reviled remake of The Wicker Man. While Lakeview Terrace isn’t as horrendous as The Wicker Man, it’s nowhere close to the level LaBute attained with his debut. The first two-thirds of Lakeview Terrace offer a little more subtlety and complexity than the seemingly straightforward premise would afford, but the climax is loud, dumb, generic, and over-the-top. Those hoping for something more interesting will be disappointed by the level to which the filmmaker stoops to get an unearned visceral rush. In pandering to Hollywood standards about how stories like this should unfold, LaBute has lost his edge.

The story goes like this: a young couple (Patrick Wilson and Kerry Washington) has just moved into their California dream home when they become the target of their next-door neighbor, who disapproves of their interracial relationship. A stern, single father, this tightly wound LAPD officer (Samuel L. Jackson) has appointed himself the watchdog of the neighborhood. His nightly foot patrols and overly watchful eyes bring comfort to some, but he becomes increasingly harassing to the newlyweds. These persistent intrusions into their lives ultimately turn tragic when the couple decides to fight back.

The film’s last fifteen minutes are so over-the-top that they’re almost impossible to take seriously and Abel’s motivation during a critical sequence near the conclusion is difficult to fathom. It’s the kind of thing that results from a screenwriter not knowing how to end a movie. Considering that the screenwriter in question is David Loughery, the man who was in part responsible for Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, perhaps this shouldn’t be surprising. Meanwhile, Patrick Wilson and Kerry Washington are okay as the couple in the crossfire but, in comparison to Jackson, they’re boring. That’s the problem with sharing the screen with a man who’s a force of nature.

There are times when Lakeview Terrace seems to be striving for something more interesting than the basic “cop from hell” movie, but any pretensions it may have of escaping this orbit come crashing down as the script veers more and more into generic territory. Going in, you might think you know how it’s going to end, and you’d probably be right. If LaBute sews some doubts along the way, it’s a testament to the way the first half of the film is constructed. It’s too bad the movie’s moderately intriguing qualities are buried under the final half-hour’s avalanche of predictability.

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/17 at 12:00am

Appaloosa

09.17.2008 | By |

Rated: R for some violence and language.
Release Date: 2008-09-17
Starring: Robert Knott, Ed Harris
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country: USA
Official Website: http://welcometoappaloosa.warnerbros.com/

Go to our film page

Appaloosa

Appaloosa, based on the book by Bostonian writer Robert B. Parker, is not your Clint Eastwood western. It is unconventional, caustic, and dare I say, peculiar. Ed Harris, who directed, co-wrote and stars in the film missed an opportunity at creating an Oscar worthy film, if only he would have altered the novel’s story a bit.

 

The plot is about ruthless rancher, Bragg (Jeremy Irons), and his gang who shoot up the town of Appaloosa whenever they get the urge.  When three of the hired hands kill a man and rape his wife, the local marshal goes out to Bragg’s ranch and gets gunned down in cold blood. Virgil Cole (Ed Harris) and Everett Hitch (Viggo Mortensen) are the exact problem solvers the town needs since they are “policemen” who do the dirty work no one else will do. The city aldermen hire them to bring Bragg to heel. Cole agrees to the job, and so the war begins. Somewhere along the way Cole falls in love with a harlot piano player (Renée Zellwegger) and tensions begin to flare amongst the men.

 

Overall, Appaloosa is not a bad movie, but just like the book, it was not laid out coherently. There are moments when you do not understand the character’s decision making, thus, making you question the entertainment value.

 

Nevertheless, the film’s best trait is the back and forth dialogue between Mortensen and Harris, and in some instances, Irons. The acting is sincerely superb, with the exception of Ms. Zellwegger, who just like in Clooney’s ‘Leatherheads’, brings the movie to a low. In addition, she has not been looking her best these days and is evident in close ups. I wonder if Harris has something against her, because there were a bevy of those. Coincidently, one of Parker’s most used (debatably over-used) themes is that of a good man loving a bad, feeble woman, one that Harris obviously agrees with. While juggling that theme with the war against Bragg, something does get lost. A little disinterest kicks in, as well as wariness.

 

Thankfully, Viggo’s presence, appearance and demeanor make up for the brief incongruous periods. To be frank, if the film dealt more with Hitch than Cole we could be talking about an Oscar candidate for best picture and actor for Mortensen. If only Harris would have adapted the novel rather than be so faithful to the book.

 

Jack Rico

By

2008/09/17 at 12:00am

Rosario Dawson: interview on ‘Eagle Eye’

09.17.2008 | By |

Rosario Dawson: interview on 'Eagle Eye'

Rosario Dawson One on One Interview For ‘Eagle Eye’
By Gabe Lerhman

Question: Do you feel like a role model for Latina women in this role?
Dawson: Absolutely. That was very much a reason why I wanted to play this part. I think that we have a lot of Latinas in the military who are unrepresented especially the forty-two thousand who are fighting overseas for us right now that are residents here who aren’t even citizens and are hoping to gain their citizenship by being in the military. I just think that it was such an incredible opportunity to represent women and Latin women and minority women in such a high profile part and such a high profile movie. It’s an incredible opportunity. Also the obvious stuff, it’s a thriller, entertaining and fun. But it does have some serious intonations about government responsibility and specific participation and where we all fall into the middle of that with our technology. It was such a great opportunity to learn a lot about what goes on behind the scenes because I went to Andrews Air Force base. I went and visited a lot of the young men and women who are doing all of the work behind the scenes. I was there as well when we were welcoming back troops that Friday. I stayed a little extra longer to meet people who had just come in. It was incredible to see how young they are and them saying, ‘I wish I was back there to kind of protect all the people that I was with.’ There’s such a solidarity there and discipline. I just wanted to get it right when I was portraying Zoe Perez.

Question: She’s almost the hero in that she almost dies to stop this awful thing, right?
Dawson:
Yeah, so it’s an interesting thing. You play that person who is so sure and she’s someone who’s created herself to be ready and she doesn’t know to what extent the demands will be and doesn’t know if she’ll even get that opportunity or even be put into that situation, but she will be ready. So it’s interesting to test someone, to see this woman who’s brought up in this very small charge that’s going where someone died and she just has to look into it and make sure that everything is okay and his brother got something attached and he has all this military stuff. They’re like, ‘You just need to interview everyone.’ It just keeps escalating and as it escalates to all the other characters it escalates for her. She has to wrap her head around something that’s bigger and it’s great to have played someone who from the beginning said, ‘I think this is bigger.’ As it was happening she was prepared for it to get larger. I loved being able to be in the position where I was arguing with Billy Bob Thornton’s character, the head of the FBI. I loved being in the position where she was standing up to the other people around her. When she’s standing in the Secretary of Defense’s office she’s also very strong, going, ‘Sir, please pardon me –’ and goes forward and is strong. She’s nervous too and I loved being able to show that she wasn’t just militant and disciplined to the point of not being human. She’s someone who takes her job very seriously and is not afraid of coming off badly because she knows she’s doing the right thing and she’s put her entire being into being the right instrument and doing the right thing. That’s an incredible kind of character to portray.

Question: I like that she’s so smart that she’s like the detective in the movie.
Dawson:
It was really interesting. Especially in a big movie like this where you look at it and go, ‘Okay, this is the story and this is what certain moments need –’ or whatever and you’re playing someone who was so vital, I think, and making sure that certain details were taken care of and information was gained. She becomes that vessel for the audience, a window for the audience to get to see what’s unveiled. I love playing the person who gives the audience the little eggs of information and allows you to see from her perspective and how she deals with it – is she blown away, is she shocked, can she handle it? That bleeds into how the audience gets into it. ‘Do we just expect this –’ like it’s plausible or do we question it and go, ‘Oh, okay, that’s too far fetched.’ I think it’s a striking thing to not only represent your character well, but also help the story move along and make sure that the audience is following because there’s so much going on all the time. I felt like a lot of time I was doing stunt acting because I was racing down the hallway and talking really fast and saying all of these things that took me a while to learn what they meant. Someone like her and in her position with that much military personnel around, they use shorthand. They’re not going to spell it all out for the audience. I had to really make it understandable for everyone in that situation so that we can follow along in the story and be able to cut from a dialogue scene into a car crash. So it’s got to have a pace and an energy. It feels so strange to do stuff like that, but on a movie like this, as big as it is, you’re always thinking about where the audience is and what they’re feeling and what they need right now in the story. So you want to always inject energy into it and I always felt like a very stirring experience, to always be thinking about that. This is one of those movies where you want them to be sitting on the edge of their seat and you want to have that lump in your throat, going, ‘What’s going to happen next?’ I grew up on movies like this. I love thrillers. I love action. So to be in that position where I’m knowing that as I’m doing this someone in their seat is going to be squirming is such a great feeling.

Rosario Dawson en Eagle Eye

Question: Is it as enjoyable watching an action movie as making one is?
Dawson:
It depends. There are certain movies that I would watch that I would know I wouldn’t like playing that type of character in those types of situation and it is fun to just be entertained. So I think it’s really kind of incredible to watch a great action movie, but to be in the position where I get to do one, where I get to watch myself up there and I get to put myself in the harness and get slung around, that honestly is the best thing. It’s great to do a great dramatic role, dialogue scenes and all that kind of stuff where it feels like you’re really acting and it all feels connected and amazing, but it’s even better to just all day long be jumping in and out of a pool and fighting and breaking things and getting flung from here to there. You come home feeling battered and bruised. I had bruised all throughout the making of this movie. I think that we were very specific at times to make sure that I had long sleeves  and long pants on because it was just impossible to not get bruised throughout the making of this movie. It feels so physically rewarding. You go out and do a scene and you feel really good about it, but if you knock that wall down and you were supposed to you definitely know that you did that and that always feels good.

Question: How was the huge crash scene at the beginning of the movie?
Dawson:
It was awesome. It was amazing. It was the middle of the night and it was one of those days where you slept all day and you end up being like a vampire from doing night shoots. You’re up at like four o’clock in the afternoon and going into hair and makeup and then you’re downtown and doing car chases with police escorts and going through red lights and seeing people held back at the lights going, ‘What’s going on?’ You’re doing this huge setup with smoke and broken glass. So it’s kind of incredible. I’m not a person who likes to look at a car crash. I think it’s absolutely horrible and terrifying to see one in person, but to see how one is constructed and put together and try to make it plausible that people could be caught up in something as gnarly as that and the police get diverted this way or that, but the story keeps moving on and how did those people get away and you have to get them. There’s something about it that feeds you energy and you realize how many people it takes to make a movie like this. There are so many stunt people and props guys and everything. So many people on the film make that one moment happen and it’s incredible. The details that go into it feel really exciting to be a part of especially with a movie like this that’s so big budgeted. You don’t have to cheat anything. You don’t have to fake anything. They really use real vehicles and they really just went for it as much as they possibly could even if they were only going to show a fraction of it. They still had it all there and that just gives you something to work with. It’s not some theater scene where you’re just pretending. It’s really physically happening around you and it’s very exciting and very interesting.

Question: After making this movie are you more cautious about what you say on your cell phone?
Dawson:
I’ve always been that way in general. I think that people are going to be much more aware of it. I was aware when it was legally passed that our cell phones could looked at and played into. So the reality of this movie is the reality of our lives right now. We are constantly being watched. If you go online we’re told where our preference is. We can be tracked by our cell phones which can tell us what direction to go if we’re lost. There are video cameras setup everywhere you walk. You’re constantly on film or on digital anyway. It’s just really incredible, the whole idea of Big Brother and the whole ‘1984’ thing. It’s a truism right now. I wonder how many people think about it because we’re so distracted by the idea of it, going, ‘Wow, it’s cool. Look at this gadget that I have.’ But we kind of forget, like, ‘Wait a second. This gadget has you.’ I think that’s an interesting and really strong conversation to have right now, about where we are and what that means about us and can we get things done without it. I think that human tenacity and the ability sometimes when we’re bored and have to figure something out is really great. I love Googling things and finding something out when you need it quick, but it was a great experience growing up and walking around the library and having to find the book that you needed. There are good things and bad things about both and I feel like something like this begs the question that we should be curious about this and not just accept it. I think that’s the most important thing.

Rosario Dawson en Eagle Eye

Question: Do you think after watching this movie someone in the White House will think this computer is a great idea, or do you think this computer already exists?
Dawson:
I have a feeling that it probably already exists [laughs]. When you think about it I believe we’d be surprised at how much people know or don’t know. I think I’m always surprised at that, from what an average person knows and what we assume our government does and doesn’t know. I think it’s always refreshing to think that no one knows what they’re talking about or that things aren’t going well, this or that, but then you end up finding out later how much things were so controlled. I think when you look at where we are in our world today as a global community, as much as we complain about things going wrong, the fact that it doesn’t go even more wrong – in a movie like this you can see how wrong things can go – is really amazing. I think it’s important to recognize that. I definitely got that out of playing Agent Zoe Perez. I was really looking at the people behind these things that keep things running as smoothly as possible. I also think that you look at this and at the characters and for the American people it was just a blip. They had this huge crisis and situation and then they just kind of moved it away. ‘And now onto something else.’ I think that’s fascinating, how many times stories come and go and you go, ‘Oh, wasn’t that – I guess it wasn’t that important.’ It could’ve been huge. How much we’re allowed to know and how much we know and how much we don’t know is something that always fascinates me.

Question: I think this movie even though it’s a blockbuster has a lesson about the dangers of technology. Also, you have this new TV show ‘Gemini Division’ which uses technology in a very different way.
Dawson:
Yeah, it’s webisodic.
Question: Can you talk about that, how technology can also be good?
Dawson: Yeah, that’s also part of questioning the technology around us and how we use that to interfere or develop or change human life forms, robotics and the things that we have around us. Our cell phones are really interesting, but if you look at what kinds of robots they’re creating in Japan you’ll be blown away and go, ‘How come we don’t have that kind of technology.’ There are some really insane things out there. Like, they have fake dogs and they’re making human caretakers, human-like caretakers. We’re not that far away from those i-Robots that are going to be picking up our kids from school, cleaning our houses and taking care of the elderly and babysitting. It’s an interesting kind of idea, that technology that’s being developed to make our lives quote unquote easier. The whole series is done through this woman’s PDA, her cell phone. The things that it can do are great. I mean, we’re excited about the iPhone, but wait until you see what this phone can do. It’s an interesting thing because the show isn’t ten years in the future, but more like five minutes in the future that we’re just about to have. That was a really fun thing to do. It was like, ‘Can we do this? It hasn’t been designed yet, but why not?’ Why couldn’t we be able to do that. I’m sure that they have the technology for it, but haven’t figured out how to make it widespread yet. So we were coming up with ideas and going, ‘Wouldn’t it be cool if our cell phone did this?’ I’m sure these are things that someone in a lab somewhere is thinking about and actually making. I loved the idea of looking at this period in a couple of years and seeing how right we were or not.

Question: How do you balance being so busy and juggling so many projects?
Dawson:
I did ‘Gemini Division’ and was shooting that in the midst of and then finished after I did both of these two films because I have ‘Seven Pounds’ coming out in December. I did that right after ‘Eagle Eye’. I had done ‘Killshot’ already before and I also shot ‘Explicit Ills’ last year before ‘Eagle Eye’. So I have these two films coming out this fall and winter and then I have two other films coming out. Then ‘Eagle Eye’ and obviously ‘Gemini Division’ is already coming out online. I’m working with my voting organization [?] Latino. We’re working on our next PSA and I’ve been doing so much with that. I’ve actually decided that I’m not working for the next couple of months to specifically focus on this election and my voting organization so that we can try to register as many people as possible and gets as much of the vote out as possible because it’s such a critical time. It’s important to me as the rest of my work is. I feel really grateful during a time when we were in the middle of a strike and there were a lot of people working. It felt really good to be able to be in a position where I was still able to take care of certain people in my family and still be working and doing really good stuff. It’s important for me to be creative as well as work on my philanthropic stuff. I’m on the board for V-Day. I work with The Lower Eastside Girl’s Club. It comes from being a New Yorker I think., multi-tasking. I like being busy and doing a lot of different things. I also like traveling and not doing all that stuff. I’m not addicted to my cell phone so as much as I do all that work stuff I also like having my private time. It’s interesting. It’s a hard balance and it’s something that I imagine I won’t always want to be doing pace wise for the rest of my life, but I have the energy for it now and so it’s probably the best time to tap into it.

Question: Why do you think that Latinos need to know that their vote is important this year?
Dawson:
Well, we are the swing vote in this election as they had in 2004. I think it’s really important for people to recognize, specifically Latinos because they have such a credible voice. They’re the people who are so tremendously affected, the first ones to get hurt in a job and the last ones to get compensated. Looking at the foreclosures that have happened since January, there have been over a million, a lot of them unfortunately have been in the Latino population. When you look at healthcare and asthma and diabetes, a lot of that disproportionately affects the Latino community. When you look at the environment and how that affects Latinos, it’s disproportionate to Latinos because a lot of them are having to deal with being near train stations or subway stations or bus stations and have to work really difficult kinds of jobs and aren’t necessarily that glamorous. That’s not all Latinos, but proportionately when you look at the actual numbers that affect them are hard. I feel that’s an important voice. It’s not just like 2006 where you had two million young people marching on the street, talking about immigration and using that as a catalyst to get themselves politically engaged. We need those two million votes. If it doesn’t translate into votes then we’re actually not going to have the critical changes that we need in our legislation. I think to really embrace the fact that we’re not just Latinos, we’re Latino Americans and I think that’s something we very much appreciate in ourselves and want to be respected. As the largest minority it’s time to use that voice we have and recognize it’s power and go, ‘You work for us.’ We’re not the people who are coming here and aren’t the people who aren’t important members of this society, we are a vital and critical people to this society. I think that needs to be reflected not just in our entertainment, but it needs to be reflected in our politics and our policies and in our representation. So I hope that people look at this, especially this election and go, ‘This affects me and my neighbor and my children and my family and my friends and it’s about time that I don’t let my silence be louder than my vote.’ It’s really important to make sure that our vote is out there and let people know that we’re going to hold them accountable if they don’t make true on the promises that they keep telling us. We’re at a vital moment in our history right now where we’re either going to not do well in the next couple of years as a country, globally against the rest of the world or we are. Our education system isn’t working. Our healthcare is in a place that’s not working. We’re in the middle of a war. Our economy, our debt is so tremendous to the point where you have Brazil and Venezuela making their own currency because they’re going, ‘America, you owe so much money to China and we owe you money, but it’s better for us with our own oil to have our own currency.’ These are really major things that I think especially Latinos who quite often have a connection outside of this country within their family to have a strong idea of foreign policy. We need that voice in our politics. I’m very much encouraged with young people especially and for Latinos to get out there, register and vote because it’s your country. Represent.

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/17 at 12:00am

Diego Luna at the JC Chavez premiere in Los Angeles

09.17.2008 | By |

Diego Luna at the JC Chavez premiere in Los Angeles

ESPN Deportes sponsored a special screening of JC Chavez, Diego Luna’s directorial debut at the Los Angeles Latino International Film Festival (LALIFF), on Monday, September 15, 2008 at the Mann Chinese 6 Theater in Hollywood, California. The film recounts the struggle and success of Julio Cesar Chavez, a national hero from humble beginnings in Culiacan, Mexico to the ultimate boxing superstar.
 
ESPN Deportes and ESPN Classic will premiere JC Chavez on Saturday, September 27 at 10:00 p.m. EST/ 7:00 p.m. PST as part of the network’s Hispanic Heritage Month programming line-up.  The film will also be available on DVD starting September 30 for an SRP of $19.95, distributed by ESPN Home Entertainment. In addition, Netflix will offer the film for digital download.

 

Diego en el Festival Internacional de Cine Latino de Los Angeles (LALIFF)

In pic: Eric Conrad, Director of Programming and Acquisitions ESPN Deportes, Gerardo Quirama, Associated Manager Strategic Programming Planning ESPN Deportes and Diego Luna, Director of JC Chavez.

 

Alejandro Arbona

By

2008/09/16 at 12:00am

Speed Racer

09.16.2008 | By |

Rating: 4.0

Rated: PG
Release Date: 2008-05-09
Starring: Larry Wachowski
Director(s):
Distributor:
Film Genre:
Country:USA
Official Website: http://speedracerthemovie.warnerbros.com/

 Go to our film page

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/16 at 12:00am

Frank Mundus, 82, Dies; Inspired ‘Jaws’

09.16.2008 | By |

Frank Mundus, 82, Dies; Inspired ‘Jaws’

Frank Mundus, the hulking Long Island shark fisherman who was widely considered the inspiration for Captain Quint, the steely-eyed, grimly obsessed shark hunter in “Jaws,” died on Wednesday in Honolulu. He was 82 and lived on a small lemon-tree farm in Naalehu, on the southern tip of the Big Island of Hawaii, 2,000 feet above shark level.

The cause was a heart attack, his wife, Jeanette, said.

Mr. Mundus and his wife moved from Montauk, on the South Fork of Long Island, to Hawaii in 1991, but often returned to Long Island in summer, when tourists and city-slicker enthusiasts sought to spice vacations with a shark hunt, priced at $1,800 for a party of five.

On just such a venture in August 2007, the tail of a nine-foot thresher shark splashing off the stern of his 42-foot boat, the Cricket II, slapped Mr. Mundus and sent him reeling. He struck right back, planting his gaff — a giant fish hook on a pole — in the shark’s back and hauling it aboard.

Mr. Mundus had run charter boats from the docks of Montauk since 1951, taking fishermen out for easy-to-catch mackerel and fighting bluefish. But one night in the 1950s, according to one of his accounts, sharks outnumbered the blues and in the ensuing struggle a shark was snared. The next day Mr. Mundus posted a sign by his boat: “Monster Fishing.”

Mr. Mundus inevitably became known as Monster Man, and he looked the part, with his safari hat, a diamond-studded gold earring, a jewel-handled dagger with a shark-tooth blade, and the big toe of one foot painted green and the other red, for port and starboard.

His most fateful encounter with a shark came one day in 1964, when Mr. Mundus already had two sharks hanging on the side of his boat and a third on the hook. Then he spotted a huge one alongside.

“I harpooned him and he took off for the horizon,” he told The Daily News in 1977. “Before I got him, I harpooned him five times. A white shark. A killer. He was 17 ½ feet long and 13 feet in girth and weighed at least 4,500 pounds. The biggest ever caught.”

The legend grew, and in the next few years, he repeatedly took Peter Benchley, who wrote the best seller “Jaws,” out to sea.

Mr. Mundus told a New York Times reporter that Mr. Benchley loved the way he harpooned huge sharks with lines attached to barrels to track them while they ran to exhaustion.

In 1975, “Jaws” was turned into Steven Spielberg’s blockbuster movie, which for years left millions of beachgoers toe-deep in the sand. Robert Shaw played Quint, who exits by sliding feet first into the belly of a monster great white.

Mr. Benchley, who died in 2006, denied that Mr. Mundus had been the inspiration for Quint, whom he described as a composite character.

Clearly irked, Mr. Mundus said: “If he just would have thanked me, my business would have increased. Everything he wrote was true, except I didn’t get eaten by the big shark. I dragged him in.”

In 1986, Mr. Mundus dragged in a 17-foot-long, 3,427-pound great white — not by harpoon, but by rod and reel, quite a feat for a man with a withered left arm.

Frank Louis Mundus was born in Long Branch, N.J., on Oct. 21, 1925, a son of Anthony and Christine Brug Mundus. He broke his arm as child and a bone-marrow infection set in, leaving that arm shorter than the other. By then, the family had moved to Brooklyn, where Mr. Mundus’s father found work as a steamfitter and his mother ran a boarding house. Doctors told Mr. Mundus’s parents that they should take him to the beach to swim to build strength in his arm.

“He fell in love with the ocean,” his wife said.

Besides his wife, the former Jeanette Hughes, whom he married in 1988, Mr. Mundus is survived by his sister, Christine Zenchak; three daughters from a first marriage, Barbara Crowley, Theresa Greene and Patricia Mundus; five grandchildren; and five great-grandchildren. His first marriage, to Janet Probasco, ended in divorce.

Mr. Mundus dropped out of high school and got a job as a freight handler. Soon after, however, the pull of the sea had him working on charter boats for $3 a day. By 1951, he had his own boat, the Cricket, and was sailing out of Montauk Harbor. He named his boats after Jiminy Cricket because people told him that with his sloping forehead and Roman nose, his profile looked like the character in the film “Pinocchio.” Although Mr. Mundus caught hundreds of sharks during his career, he became something of a conservationist in later years. He promoted the use of circle hooks, which catch in the jaw, not the gut, increasing a shark’s chances of survival if it escapes or is released. He also helped start a shark-tagging program and voiced support for catch-and-release fishing.

As it turns out, Mr. Mundus did not think much of “Jaws.”

“It was the funniest and the stupidest movie I’ve ever seen, because too many stupid things happened in it,” his Web site says. “For instance, no shark can pull a boat backwards at a fast speed with a light line and stern cleats that are only held in there by two bolts.”

Mack Chico

By

2008/09/14 at 12:00am

"Burn After Reading" burns the competition

09.14.2008 | By |

"Burn After Reading" burns the competition

After several straight super-slow weekends, the box office has gotten fired up. Defying many projections, Brad Pitt and George Clooney’s comedy Burn After Reading led a team of four major new releases to generally better-than-expected performances, boosting the cumulative theatrical take by nearly 34 percent over the same frame a year ago.

Blazing the trail was Burn After Reading, which banked an impressive $19.4 mil, according to Sunday’s estimates. That’s the best debut ever, by far, for filmmaking brothers Joel and Ethan Coen: Of their 13 previous movies, only 2004’s The Ladykillers ($12.6 mil debut) and 2003’s Intolerable Cruelty ($12.5 mil bow) even premiered north of $10 mil. The opening sum was also good news for Pitt and Clooney, neither of whom has had such a big, non-Ocean’s opening in several years. To find one, you have to go back to 2005’s Mr. & Mrs. Smith for Pitt and to, gosh, 2000’s The Perfect Storm for Clooney — although, to be fair, both actors tend to make a lot of small-release indie flicks.

For the Coens, it’s a sweet follow-up to their Best Picture winner, No Country for Old Men, which also wound up their top total grosser, with $74.3 mil. Can Burn After Reading do as well? It’ll be a challenge, considering the movie’s merely moderate reviews and a fall box office slate that’s only going to get more crowded. Still, this is a nice start.

Tyler Perry’s The Family That Preys (No. 2) was next, with $18 mil. Though down a tick from the consistent $20 mil-plus bows of most of Perry’s movies, The Family That Preys did well considering that it wasn’t based on one of the auteur’s popular stage productions. Also welcome: That solid A CinemaScore review from audiences, who tend to abandon Perry’s films after the first weekend. Perhaps they’ll show this one more love in the long run.

Close behind at No. 3 was Righteous Kill, the Robert De Niro-Al Pacino reunion, which grossed a solid $16.5 mil. That’s the biggest non-franchise premiere for these two actors in ages, as well: De Niro’s Hide and Seek bowed to $22 mil in 2005, and Pacino’s The Recruit premiered with $16.3 mil in 2003.

As expected, the weekend’s other big opener, The Women (No. 4), fared worst, banking just $10.1 mil in nearly 3,000 theaters, though I suppose that sum could have been a lot lower. In actual fact, that’s Meg Ryan‘s best bow in — gasp! — almost a decade. Four-week holdover The House Bunny brought in $4.3 mil to round out the top five. Tropic Thunder (No. 6 with $4.2 mil) jumped the $100 mil mark, as did Step Brothers and The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor. And in art houses, Alan Ball’s controversial race/sex drama Towelhead enjoyed a nice $13,250 debut average in four locations.

Overall, the increased box office revenues were truly welcome; this was the first ”up” weekend in nearly two months. And that Hollywood was able to achieve some success without the help of Batman, well, hey, that’s even better.

Select a Page